31
Fís Foghlaim Forbairt www. pdst. ie © PDST 2016 This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ie/ . You may use and re-use this material (not including images and logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike Licence.

Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

Fís

Fog

hla

im

Forb

air

t

www.pdst.ie© P D S T 2 0 1 6

This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ie/. You may use and re-use this material (not including images and logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike Licence.

Page 2: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Timetabling Preparing the Timetable for 2017/18

Page 3: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Aims of the Session

To introduce practical approaches to timetable design

Data gathering (Curriculum & Teachers)Planning Matrices (Nuts & bolts)

Page 4: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Pre Planning Information

• Configuration of School Day• Grouping of Students -- streamimg, setting

etc.• ‘Blocking’ and ‘Setting’ of Subjects• Teacher allocation -- DES• Continuity/rotation of teachers?• Time Allocation (For Teachers; For Subjects)• Subject Sampling• Constraints: Job-Sharing; Career Breaks;

Practical Subjects• Concessions to Teachers?

Page 5: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Towards Timetabling 2017-18

1.Curriculum demands, programmes offered TY, LCA, LCVP etc…

2. Teacher Demands

3. Subject demands – department meetings

Page 6: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Curriculum Data GatheringLast years timetableCurriculum Demands

– Options – 1st, 2nd , 5th.– T/Y Programme– LCA + LCVP demands– 1st Year classes sorted– DES Requirements– JCT Templates

Subject/Dept. Demands– Banding/Setting

Teacher Demands

Page 7: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Last Years TT• Issues which arose during the year

and can now be amended• Any issues from inspectorate?• Extra teacher on band?

Page 8: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

• Data gathering tool• Discussion(Rem: cultural practice in your school)

Subject Dept. Demands

Page 9: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

• Human Element Handout• Discussion(Rem: cultural practice in your school)

Teacher Requests

Page 10: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Moving UpKeep core of time table from this year.Clear timetable but keep structure for:

• 1st 2nd • 2nd 3rd • 5th 6th • All these year groups are moving up a

year and will mirror closely what existed in this current year i.e. class/teacher/opt group etc.

Page 11: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ieGetting to the Nuts & Bolts of Timetable planning

• Pen & Paper• Planning Matrices

• Year Curriculum (Teaching Groups)

• Teacher Hours• Can be done on computer package –

easier initially on paper

Page 12: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Year Curriculum

1. Assigning teachers to each class2. One sheet per year

(Two versions follow)

Page 13: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning Matrices

Page 14: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning Matrices

Page 15: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning MatricesSixth Year (XX)

A B C D W X YReligion 3 MK WH FR SS RM Irish 6 KS JJ SD FP WD English 5 AA JG BB (O) SS RM Maths 6 BC FP WD GN EE Opt 1 6 Fre (o) Fre Ger Span Span

SP BE GC GA GG Opt 2 5 H Econ Music Geog Chem Biol

EE LP HG MM BM Opt 3 5 Biol Biol H Econ Physics Art Bus

MM ML CC YF PQ RS Opt 4 5 Ag Sc Hist Biol Acc Music Geog

SC MA HH GN HG FH

Page 16: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning for teachers

Ensure teachers are fully utilised

(Two approaches follow)

Page 17: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning Matrices

Page 18: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning Matrices

Page 19: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Planning Matrices

Counting class periods (Hrs) assigned to each teacher

Teacher A

6IR 6

5IR5

TY Ir3

2IR5

1Dara Ir4

3Orla His3

3Orla PC1

TY Photog(2) 4

33

Page 20: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Computer Package• Promote the curriculum• Create dummy classes• Create new teachers• Enter the additional curriculum• Specialist rooms need to go in now• Check against planning sheets• Packages have planning matrices

Page 21: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Computer Package • Some items may need to be fixed in

place manually before pressing ‘go’! • Outside teachers• LCA/TY (Work exp/community work)• Meetings • Sharing subjects with another school• Facility restriction e.g. gym, kitchen etc.• Team teaching

• Teacher restrictions

Page 22: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Running the TT• All planning and inputting done• Check that you have allocated the

teachers to each class correctly.• Check feasibility – 100%• Ensure specialist rooms allocated. • Follow programme instructions • Run time table without restrictions• Select where to start

– Yr group, doubles, blocks, tricky subject• An intense few days!

Page 23: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Running the TT• Keep an eye on

– Spread of classes throughout timetable.– Doubles – Spread of core throughout week – Spread of options

• Check 21hrs 20mins contact time• Job Sharers

Page 24: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ieAssessing the Timetable: Jim Lyons (2000)

• Does the timetable represent the educational philosophy of the school?

• Are subjects satisfactorily distributed through the timetable cycle?

• Are subjects treated fairly, by all having a fair distribution of lessons throughout the day?

• Are specialist rooms and other resources used to the best advantage?

• Is gender equity observed?

Page 25: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ieAssessing the Timetable: Jim Lyons (2000)

• Has movement been kept to a minimum?• Is the staff non-teaching time reasonably

spread?• Does the timetable facilitate curriculum

continuity for the following year – and the year after?

• Is the timetable presented as simply as possible?

• Are class timetables balanced and do all classes have a fair share of experienced staff?

Page 26: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

RememberResource Hours must be allocated to individual studentsLearning support is within the timetable but must be used appropriatelyKeep an eye on 21hrs 20minsTeacher allocationLabel timetable “Draft” until sure it’s right

Page 27: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final
Page 28: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Page 29: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Page 30: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie

Page 31: Tanaiste timetabling presentation jan 2017 final

ww

w.p

dst.

ie