2
AS Coursework Overall Marks Name: STICKLEY Georgia Planning – Comments and mark out of 15/20 For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 60/60 For full comments please see the production marks sheet Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 18/20 Question 1: Video – excellent commentary on how conventions used in production, very good understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used to set up narrative, and conform/challenge genre codes. There is great evidence of linking product to real products to highlight argument. Good use of clips and images. Question 2: PowToon – great detail on how representation and mise-en-scene used to represent characters, with good links to audience expectations and how they can relate to characters. Use of theorists would have enhanced answer. Question 3: PowerPoint/SlideShare – excellent detail on a range of distributors that you could choose with great detail on final choice. Question 4 & 5: Bubl – good use of interview with typical audience for genre but no real detail on who they are and how you chose them. Needed better links to pre-prod research. Good detail on how audience was attracted, good audience feedback included to show if goals had been met. Great layout and use of technology. Question 6: PowToon – clear and succinct detail on technologies uses with some reflective detail on what was learnt. Question 7: Emaze – great analysis and detail on progress made with good addition of screen grabs to reinforce points. Excellent detail on questions showing great understanding of

Stickley georgia as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Stickley georgia as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet

AS Coursework Overall Marks

Name: STICKLEY Georgia

Planning – Comments and mark out of 15/20

For full comments please see the pre-production marks sheet

Construction – Main Task – comments and mark out of 60/60

For full comments please see the production marks sheet

Evaluation – Comments and mark out of 18/20Question 1: Video – excellent commentary on how conventions used in production, very good understanding shown of how mise-en-scene used to set up narrative, and conform/challenge genre codes. There is great evidence of linking product to real products to highlight argument. Good use of clips and images.Question 2: PowToon – great detail on how representation and mise-en-scene used to represent characters, with good links to audience expectations and how they can relate to characters.Use of theorists would have enhanced answer. Question 3: PowerPoint/SlideShare – excellent detail on a range of distributors that you could choose with great detail on final choice.Question 4 & 5: Bubl – good use of interview with typical audience for genre but no real detail on who they are and how you chose them. Needed better links to pre-prod research.Good detail on how audience was attracted, good audience feedback included to show if goals had been met. Great layout and use of technology.Question 6: PowToon – clear and succinct detail on technologies uses with some reflective detail on what was learnt. Question 7: Emaze – great analysis and detail on progress made with good addition of screen grabs to reinforce points.

Excellent detail on questions showing great understanding of task, audience and genre. Great use of analytical detail, images and research in answering questions. Read your work, as there are lapses in spelling, punctuation and capital letters!Very good use of technologies.

Total 95/100 Grade: A