View
153
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STAGES OR LAYERS? LOOKING AT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELF FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES
Tanya Maria GeritsidouThe American College of Greece
OUTLINE Definitions of the Self The Self in Cognitive-Developmental
Theories The Rouge Test The Awareness of Self Developmental Approaches: Stage Theory Developmental Approaches: Layers Theory Looking at Six Interviews about the Self References
WHAT IS THE SELF? Model of the Self derived by William
James “Me” : Involves relatively objective
material, social and spiritual characteristics (social and material self)
“I”: Involves subjective experiential features such as
Life history and experience Continuation over time Pure ego
WHAT IS THE SELF? Concepts of the Self by Winnicott
True Self The experience of being alive (simply being) Spontaneous, non-verbal gestures
False Self Other people’s expectations overriding the True
Self Behaviors and relationships that lack
spontaneity and sincerity that the True Self does
THE SELF IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENTAL THEORIESCognitive-developmental theories focus
on the quality, rate and general manner of change in the thinking processes of human beings.
How human beings develop self-awareness and self-concept(s) is studied through either stage theories, such as Piaget’s, or (rather recently) layer theories (such as Rochat’s).
THE ROUGE TESTAlso called “the mirror mark test”, it is
used to determine when infants have developed self awareness:
(it is more fun to watch)https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2I0kwSua44
SELF AWARENESS VS SELF CONSCIOUSNESS
SELF AWARENESS
When the individual can examine him/herself from the point of view of someone other than him/herself
SELF CONSCIOUSNESS
Can only occur after achieving self awareness
Involves all understanding about the self and is the basis for identity development
STAGE THEORIES Stage theories assume that
development occurs in a mostly linear progression.
Each stage has to be completed before the person is ready to proceed to the next one.Piaget’s Theory
OfCognitive
Development
Damon & Hart’sModel of
Self Understanding with 7 schemes
Allport’s 8 StagesOf
Self -Development
PIAGET’S STAGE THEORY AND THE SELF Sensorimotor Stage (0–2 yrs old)
No self-awareness until object permanence begins (12 m/o)
Preoperational Stage (2–6/7 yrs old) Self-awareness + object permanence =
egocentrism Concrete Operations Stage (6/7–11/12 yrs old)
Self-awareness and Self-consciousness Formal Operations Stage (11/12 + yrs old)
Self-awareness and self-consciousness with more abstract thought and ideas and categorizations involved
DAMON & HART’S 7 SCHEMES OF SELF UNDERSTANDING
4 Levels L1: Categorical
identifications (early childhood)
L2: Comparative Assessments (middle to late childhood)
L3: Interpersonal Implications of the self (early adolescence)
L4: Systematic beliefs, principles and plans (late adolescensce +)
7 Schemes
Physical self Active self Social self Psychological self
Continuity of self Distinctness of self Agency of self
ALLPORT’S EIGHT STAGES OF SELF DEVELOPMENT
Sense of Bodily Self (0-2 yrs old) Bodily sensations and physical senses as the beginning of self awareness
Sense of Self Identity (0-2 yrs old) Acquisition of self awareness in parallel with the acquisition of language
Sense of Self Esteem or Pride (2-4 yrs old) Beginnings of need for praise and credit and self evaluation
Sense of Self Extension (4-6 yrs old) Beginnings of identifying with other individuals, groups and items than the self
proper/ the body
ALLPORT’S EIGHT STAGES OF SELF DEVELOPMENT
Self Image (4-6 yrs old) Beginnings of the “looking glass self” and other aspects of identity, such as sexual
identity and social identity
Sense of Self as a Rational Coper (6-12 yrs old) Beginnings of awareness of life’s problem solving and coping strategies
Propriate Striving (12+ yrs old) Life goal setting and aspirations/expectations begin
Self as a Knower (12+ yrs old) Moral thinking, political thinking and abstract problem solving
ROCHAT’S LAYER THEORY OF THE SELF From a biologically given core, layers of
awareness are added in a cumulative fashion
Each layer expands the experiential range of the child
No equilibration takes place, no restructuring or change of pre-existing layers with the development of a new one
Each layer adds on to whatever already exists
ROCHAT’S LAYER THEORY OF THE SELF A new layer adds new pathways to navigate
and experience the self and the experience of the self
Each layer becomes a zone of awareness. We navigate between layers depending on our state of mind and focus (attention), throughout our life (even the before the Rouge Test layers!)
Our attention/ focus to each layer depends on our state of consciousness (poly-awareness)
ROCHAT’S LAYER THEORY OF THE SELF1. Starting state (differentiating the self from the world
via rooting) birth+2. Situated self awareness (capable of mapping own
body space) 2 m/o+3. Birth of “Me” (perception of self via actions, since birth
and via Rouge Test at 2 yrs+)4. Birth of “Me” extending over time (recognizing self as
enduring over time, rather than a third party) 3 yrs+5. Meta-cognitive Self knowledge (hold multiple
representations and perspectives on objects and people) 6 yrs+
DETECTING SELF-AWARENESSLooking at 6 interviews about the self
MARY, AGE 5 Upon being asked if she wanted to
describe herself, she said ‘no’ after a bit of thought.
Upon being asked if she wanted to draw herself, she said ‘yes’ and produced two versions of herself, one naked and one with clothes:
MARY, AGE 5
MARY, AGE 5 She described herself by physical
characteristics. She couldn’t describe her personality with
character traits. She characteristically said that she chose her friend because she’s “cute” and that her friend likes her because she is “tall”
Ideal self would be “a princess” because she would have long hair and glossy dresses and no mother
MARY, AGE 5 Likes and dislikes about herself were described
only in terms of activities: “I can swim fast” “my mom doesn’t let me swim in the sea at winter”
She expected herself to change in 5 years because “I will be 6 years old then and I’ll be able to read”
But she said her self wouldn’t change because she had a name and her name was Mary
She became who she was because her dad picked the name Mary for her
MARY, AGE 5Stage Theory
Piaget: Self awareness, egocentrism, Self permanence
Damon & Hart: Categorical Identifications
Allport: Pride, Self Image (‘looking glass self’)
Layer Theory Birth of “Me”
(perception of self via actions)
Birth of “Me” extending over time (perception that the self endures over time)
Awareness Co-awareness
BOB, AGE 6 Wanted to talk rather than draw, described himself in
terms of physical characteristics and what clothes he was wearing
Described his personality as “polite” and “sad when kids make fun of me” but kept reverting to physical characteristics
When asked how I would be able to tell him apart from an identically looking boy, he answered “I would wear different clothes”
When asked how I would be able to tell him apart from an identically looking boy with identical clothes he was stuck, and finally answered “maybe my bones would be different?” (he added “mine would be striped”)
BOB, AGE 6 He kept thinking of himself in
physical/categorical terms (wanting to change his eye colour, being proud of his clothing)
When asked if he would have changed in 5 years, he answered “no because I haven’t changed now either”
When asked how he became who he is, he also answered “I was baptized and became Bob.”
BOB, AGE 6Stage Theory
Piaget: Self awareness, self permanence, some egocentrism
Damon & Hart: Categorical Identifications
Allport: Pride, Self Image
Layer Theory Birth of “Me”
extending over time Awareness Co-awareness Some not yet
articulable self knowledge
PEPI, AGE 9 Described herself in physical terms Described her personality as “sensitive, I laugh
easily, I can wait for something if I have to” but after saying ‘I don’t know’ a lot and needing to be encouraged that she can’t make a mistake
She voiced wishing to be able to perform better She expressed pride at being able to draw well She wants to become a fashion designer and
painter
PEPI, AGE 9 She wished for everyone to be happy She wished to not fight with her sister She wished to have met her grandfather She expected her self to have changed in
5 years because she “would be older” but said her personality and physical characteristics would be the same
She said she became who she is because “that’s how I was brought up”
PEPI, AGE 9Stage Theory
Piaget: Self awareness and Self consciousness and some abstract thinking of values and situations
Damon & Hart: Comparative Assessments and Interpersonal implications of the Self
Allport: Self Image and Rational Coping
Layer Theory
Meta cognitive Self Knowledge
MONA, AGE 11 She asked for qualifiers for the questions
before answering Didn’t describe herself in physical terms, but
in terms of preference: “I like sports, music and drawing”
She wished to be more popular and smarter Her ideal self would be good at sports,
drawing and music, and she identified these as her goals too
MONA, AGE 11 Her wishes were about belonging and
acceptance by her parents and her peers, and finding friendship
She expects herself to change, but only in terms of behavior due to different friends and places. She expects her personality and thoughts to remain the same
She became who she is by correcting things she did wrong or ‘too much
MONA, AGE 11 Piaget: Formal Operations (self
awareness and consciousness with abstract ideas about the world and her peers)
Damon & Hart: Interpersonal Implications of the Self
Allport: Rational Coping Self
ANNA, AGE 15 Described herself only in terms of
character traits and goal orientation Described herself in terms of her flaws
and her preferred hobbies, and specified herself as “a good person”
Voiced some dissatisfaction with her physical appearance
Wished to be loved by everyone, to be adored and be very happy
ANNA, AGE 15 Specified goals: to pursue a degree (be a doctor or a
psychologist), to find the perfect man and “be at the top tier of society in order to help people”
Wished for her family not to have quarrels, for the people of the world to be happy and not wish for anything
Voiced pride for managing to lose 15 kilos and become “thin for my height” 6 months ago
She expected to change for the better because she will be “adult and independent” and “able to control how to live my life,” but her personality would remain the same
She became who she is because “that’s how I was born”
ANNA, AGE 15 Piaget: Formal Operations (abstract
thoughts and ideas about the self) Damon & Hart: Systematic beliefs,
Principles and Plans Allport: Propriate Striving & Self as
Knower
SOPHIE, AGE 60 Described herself with some character traits but
mostly in relation to her goals and role in society Didn’t voice a wish for change of self, but
change of her environment Her ideal self and goal is “to approximate the
perfect human being” and when asked how that is, said “like Jesus Christ” and elaborated “fully free from material and social handicaps, attuned with nature, attuned with people, fully in control of himself”
SOPHIE, AGE 60 Character flaws were always in relation to how efficiently
she estimates she can reach her goal (“I haven’t thrown off all dependencies with others/society yet”)
Wishes were solely to achieve that goal and “help people be free from social systems that keep them on the basest levels of Maslow’s pyramid”
Pride was in relation to her progress towards her goal Expected to be different in the future “because I’ll be
more evolved” She became who she is “because I always had these
goals, of course not so well defined, but felt them push me”
SOPHIE, AGE 60 Piaget: Formal Operations (abstract
thoughts and ideas about the self) Damon & Hart: Systematic Beliefs,
Principles and Plans Allport: Propriate Striving and Self as
Knower
WHAT THIS EXERCISE TAUGHT ME:Development of the concept of self is dynamic and ever changing
as the person interacts with the environment and the results of his/her own cognitions.
To limit ourselves in any one theory, is to blind ourselves to aspects of the Self itself, and its development across the ages
within the human lifespan.
Thank you for your attention!
REFERENCESBarrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.004Carlsson, J., Wängqvist, M., & Frisén, A. (2015). Identity development in the late twenties : A never ending story.
Developmental Psychology, 51(3), 334–345. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038745Carpendale, J. I. M., & Racine, T. P. (2011). Intersubjectivity and egocentrism: Insights from the relational perspectives
of Piaget, Mead, and Wittgenstein. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), 346–354. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.005
Cunningham, S. J., Brebner, J. L., Quinn, F., & Turk, D. J. (2014). The self-Reference effect on memory in early childhood. Child Development, 85(2), 808–823. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12144
Fenigstein, A. (1984). Self-consciousness and the overperception of self as a target. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 860–870. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.860
Guardo, C. J., & Bohan, J. B. (1971). Development of a sense of self-identity in children. Child Development, 42(6), 1909–21. http://doi.org/doi:10.2307/1127594
Hass, R. G. (1984). Perspective taking and self-awareness: drawing an E on your forehead. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 788–798. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.788
Kesselring, T., & Müller, U. (2011). The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), 327–345. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008
Meadows, S. (1993). The child as thinker. London, United Kingdom: RouteledgePerner, J., Stummer, S., Sprung, M., & Doherty, M. (2002). Theory of mind finds its Piagetian perspective: Why
alternative naming comes with understanding belief. Cognitive Development, 17(3-4), 1451–1472. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00127-2
Rochat, P. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 717–731. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00081-3
Rochat, P. (2015). Layers of awareness in development. Developmental Review, 38, 122–145. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.009
Wilkin, P. (2006). In search of the true self: a clinical journey through the vale of soul-making. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13(1), 12–8. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00904.x