Upload
gina-minks
View
1.049
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Final Presentation - Team 1 - EME 6691 Fall 2009
Citation preview
STUDENT RECRUITING PROGRAM ANALYSISInstructional Systems Graduate Program
OVERVIEWIS Program Recruiting
Conducted by:
• ISRC - Instructional Systems Recruiting Committee (ISRC)
• ISAACRC -Instructional Systems Alumni Advisory Council
Recruiting Committee (ISAACRC)
Key questions:
• To what extent are current recruiting processes effective?
• What interventions would improve the recruiting process to
achieve optimal results?
PROCESS• Research
▫ Interviews
Faculty, Staff, Alumni
▫ Surveys
Faculty, Students, Alumni
▫ Literature Review
Current and Historical Recruiting Data
• Business goals determined
▫ NOTE: Determination impacted by time
constraints
• Performance goals established
• Gaps and Causes identified
• Interventions suggested
BUSINESS ANALYSISIDENTIFYING KEY GOALS
Achieve 10% increase
from year to year in the
number of actively
enrolled students
PERFORMANCE ANALYSISPERFORMANCE MEASURES
1.Number of students actively enrolled each academic year
2.IS Program representation at recruiting events throughout the academic year
3.Contact of prospective students during the admission process
GAP ANALYSIS: PERFORMANCE MEASURE 1: STUDENT ENROLLMENT
CURRENT PERFORMANCE OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE
▫Master’s: 72 actual
▫Doctorate: 45 actual
▫Master’s: 101 optimal
▫Doctorate: 54 optimal
From data collected in years 2004 – 2009; Assumes a 10% increase each year from 2004
GAP ANALYSIS: PERFORMANCE MEASURE 2: RECRUITING
CURRENT PERFORMANCE OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE
▫ On-Campus :
▫ Sporadic classroom visits
▫ Performance at events not
measured
▫ Conferences:
▫ 2 or 3 attended
▫ ad hoc marketing materials
▫ On-Campus:
▫ Visit 20 classes of different
majors
▫ Collect 25 names at all events
▫ Conferences
▫ Attend 4 conferences
▫ Create and post marketing
packet
▫ Mentor anyone involved in
recruiting activities
▫ Mentor students to represent at
conferences
GAP ANALYSIS: PERFORMANCE MEASURE 2: RECRUITING
CURRENT PERFORMANCE OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE
▫ Corporate Recruiting:
▫ None
▫ Print Journals:
▫ None
▫ Corporate Recruiting:
▫ Prepare corporate recruiting
packet, host on IS website
▫ Develop list of target
corporations
▫ Visit 5 corporations
▫ Build and maintain relationships
▫ Print Journals:
▫ Budget to advertise in 4 journals
annually
GAP ANALYSIS: PERFORMANCE MEASURE 2: RECRUITING
CURRENT PERFORMANCE OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE
▫ IS Website
▫ Unknown traffic to website
▫ Very low Search Engine
Optimization (SEO) for common
search terms
▫ Information is not current
▫ Social Media
▫ Not used strategically for
recruiting
▫ IS Website
▫ Increase site visits by 30%
▫ Increase SEO
▫ Post recruiting schedule, social
media contacts and widgets,
planned conference attendance
▫ Post multi-media introduction to
the program
▫ Social Media
▫ Use Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn,
and Ning to increase footprint
GAP ANALYSIS: PERFORMANCE MEASURE 3: PROSPECTIVE STUDENT CONTACT
CURRENT PERFORMANCE OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE
Interest/Pre-Application
Contacts made:•Mary Kate•Recruiting Committee•Faculty Representative•Alumni Representative •ISSA Representative
Post Acceptance
Contacts made:•Mary Kate•Department Chair
Interest/Pre-Application
Contacts made:•Mary Kate•Recruiting Committee•Faculty Representative•Alumni Representative
Post Acceptance
Contacts made:•Mary Kate•Department Chair•ISSA Representative•Advisor
CAUSE ANALYSISHistory of the IS Recruiting Program
2004 2006 2009
Dr. Reiser•2006 and earlier•IS Alumni Advisory Council Recruiting Committee currently reports to Dr. Reiser
Dr. Johnson
•2009 – current•2009: added Recruiting Coordinator position (currently held by Christie Suggs)
Dr. Keller• 2004 – 2006• Jim Russell (former faculty)• MS Assistant• Rhett Brymer• Consulted with Reinhart
Lerch (ODDL)
Gap in leadership
CAUSE ANALYSIS
Funding not secured for:
• Conferences
• Print Journals
Processes not formalized for:
• Off-Campus Recruiting
• Website maintenance
• Social media
RECOMMENDATIONS
Develop Corporate Recruiting
Strategy
Advertise in trade Journals
CREDITS
The research, documentation and presentation of this report
was created in collaboration by the following: Florida State
University, IS graduate students from the EME6691 -
Performance Systems Analysis fall 2009 course:
Laura Bryant
Lea Ann Gates
Alisa Jacobs
Gina Minks
Kendall St.
Hilaire