Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, School Law, Student Sexual Harassment, Bullying, Due Process, Discrimination, Assault, Freedom of Expression, Legal Rights of Students, Teachers, Administrators. In 2004, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis was recognized as the Central Washington University Alumni Association Distinguished Alumnus for the College of Education and Professional Studies. Dr. Kritsonis was nominated by alumni, former students, friends, faculty, and staff. Final selection was made by the Alumni Association Board of Directors. Recipients are CWU graduates of 20 years or more and are recognized for achievement in their professional field and have made a positive contribution to society. For the second consecutive year, U.S. News and World Report placed Central Washington University among the top elite public institutions in the west. CWU was 12th on the list in the 2006 On-Line Education of “America’s Best Colleges.”
Citation preview
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972 and The Department of Education implement regulations prohibiting sex discrimination.
The Supreme Court, Congress, and the Federal executive departments recognize sexual harassment of students.
The guidance focuses on a school’s responsibility under Title IX and the Title IX regulations to address sexual harassment against students.
Sexual harassment – unwelcomed conduct of a sexual nature; ie. Sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, verbal, non-verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature.
Note – sexual harassment of a student can deny or limit on the basis of sex, the students ability to participate or receive benefits.
Applies to all public and private schools. Protects male and female students
against sex discrimination. Prohibits bullying by groups or
individuals. Gender-based harassment and/or sexual
harassment constitute a hostile environment.
Assurance of compliance mandates.
In assessing sexually harassing conduct, schools must consider the following:
Does the conduct deny or limit the student’s ability to participate or benefit from the program based on sex?
If so, does the nature of the school’s responsibility address that conduct of the harasser and the context in which the harassment occurred?
“Quid Pro Quo” harassmentHostile environment
*Note: A hostile environment can occur even if the harassment is not targeted specifically at the individual complaintant.
Statements by any witness to the alleged incident.
Evidence about the relative credibility of the allegedly harassed student and the alleged harasser.
Evidence that the alleged harasser has been found to have harassed others.
Evidence of the allegedly harassed student’s reaction or behavior after the alleged harassment.
Evidence about whether the student claiming harassment filed a complaint or took action to protest the conduct immediately after the occurrence.
Other contemporaneous evidence.
Sexual harassment of a student by a teacher can be discrimination in violation of Title IX.
The employer (teacher) is in violation of Title IX when he/she inappropriately use their position.
The teacher or employer is also responsible for the ending and recurrence of the harassment.
Ultimately, it is the school’s obligation to take immediate action on the case.
Schools and Universities are required by Title IX regulations to adopt and publish grievance procedures.
When students or parents file a complaint.
Schools should discuss confidentiality standards and concerns with the complainant initially.
Public school employees have certain due process rights under the United States Constitution. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Action (FERPA) does not override federally protected due process rights.
Title IX was designed to protect students from sex discrimination.
In order to prevent or redress sexual misconduct on students by school employees, administrators must formulate, interpret, and apply Title IX regulations.
