View
247
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation from EDINA Serials Forum, March 2014 - London/Edinburgh, given by Fred Guy and Adam Rusbridge
Citation preview
Securing continuing access to e-journal content – EDINA Services
Fred Guy & Adam Rusbridge
1
Securing continuing access to e-journal content: how EDINA’s
services can help
EDINA SERIALS FORUM
2
PRINT JOURNALS
Subscription & ownership
Cambridge UL National Library of Scotland
/
3
E-JOURNALS
Subscriptions
Library website Hosting websites
Current access
Long term access ?
Remote access
Curren
t acc
ess
Long t
erm
acce
ss?
Licence to ‘use’
Providing long term access
• Print journals– purchased materials held in libraries and national libraries with legal deposit legislation (since 1662 in England) retain material
• Electronic –Libraries do not ‘own’ the material. They have a licence to ‘use’. Who, then, is (or should be) responsible for long term access?
Publishers, subscription agents, national libraries?
There is legal deposit legislation in UK (passed April 2013) but it is quite restrictive (need to make a visit to one of the national libraries).
4
The KeepersThe ke
The Keepers(Archiving Agencies)
To the rescue
The Keepers – contributing to The Keepers Registry
National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences
The Keepers Registry: finding out what the keepers are doing
http/
eg. Portico
eg. CLOCKSS
Library
Knowing which e-journals are being preserved (and the extent) and by whom helps to inform decision making in managing collections.
8
The Keepers Registry – key facts
• Aggregation of metadata supplied by a number of archiving agencies (10 at present)
• This metadata :– Describes a journal (title, ISSN, publisher)– Identifies the agency which is archiving the journal– Provides information on which volumes of the journal
have been preserved• The project started as PEPRS 1(August 2008 – July 2010);
Phase 2 (August 2010 – July 2012); Phase 3 October 2012 – July 2013)
• Funded by Jisc• ISSN International Centre, Paris, is a partner providing the
ISSN Register• PEPRS Beta service April 2011 – September 2011• The Keepers Registry October 2011 -
ExtentStatus Codes 5 Keepers
Search
Title comparison service
• Provides information about whether or not titles are in an archiving programme
• Allows uploading of large number of titles for the comparison
• Uploaded titles are compared with the titles in the Keepers Registry
• Results can be viewed online and a report is supplied
Key role of Jisc in e-journal preservation
14
• Sponsoring reports Scoping study for a registry of electronic journals that indicates
where they are archived . Rightscom & Loughborough University. 2008
• Encouraging discussion JARVIG – e-Journals ARchiVing Interest Group. Preparation of a plan
with KR at the heart.
• Funding development work PEPRS & the Keepers Registry; the Keepers Extra Project
‘At-risk’ titles
• ….two-thirds (36,326) of the online titles regarded as of some value by researchers and students in the UK are seemingly ‘at risk of loss’.
Peter Burnhill. Generating Actionable Evidence on E-journal Archiving. The Keepers Registry Blog Post. October 2013.
16
Gap of Dunloe, Ireland
17
18
How to bridge the gap?
How can the infrastructure be sustained?
Publishers Keepers Keepers Registry
Services
The Keepers Extra
• Two year funding from Jisc (March 2014 – February 2016)
– Ensure that the current platform for the Keepers Registry is fit-for-purpose and as future-proof as possible
– Ensure technical integration with other emerging standards and protocols
– Ensure focus of work is intelligently co-ordinated with other emerging related initiatives
– Build capacity and capability within the community to understand and exploit the value of archived journal material
– Design an international governance, oversight outreach and advocacy framework
20
Cornell and Columbia Mellon funded project
Cornell/Columbia Mellon Project
• Project GoalsThe project aims to identify priority
content from the perspective of the research library community and make significant progress towards increasing the number and extent of e-journal archiving by major preservation programs.
Acknowledgements
23
Images from Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/
•Bookshelves - jvoss
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jvoss/55540713
•Cambridge University Library – Steve Cadman
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevecadman/2353585565
•National Library of Scotland – Sawa
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sawak/310362068
•Licence – Seattle Municipal Archives
http://www.flickr.com/photos/seattlemunicipalarchives/6277315476/
•Telescope
http://www.flickr.com/photos/unloveable/2423303716/
•Vaults – Chris Arnold
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wka/4283285201/
•Gap of Dunloe - Chris Blanar
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisblanar/470973962/
•Forth Road Bridge – Edinburgh Spotlighthttp://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151629417409416&set=a.201854474415.162850.152916769415&type=1&theater
References
1. Generating Actionable Evidence on E-journal Activityhttp://thekeepers.blogs.edina.ac.uk/2013/10/28/generating-
actionable-evidence-on-e-journal-archiving/2. Cornell/Columbia Mellon projecthttps://confluence.cornell.edu/display/culpublic/
Strategies+for+Expanding+E-Journal+Preservation