20
Los Angeles | London | New Delhi Singapore | Washington DC London Online – 1 st Dec, 2011 Open Access in the Humanities and Social Sciences David Ross, Publisher, STM Caroline Porter, Publisher, HSS

SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Caroline Porter and David Ross speaking at the Online Information #Online11 exhibition in London, December 2011

Citation preview

Page 1: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Open Access in the Humanities and Social Sciences

David Ross, Publisher, STM

Caroline Porter, Publisher, HSS

Page 2: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SAGE and Open Access

● Predominately a Humanities and Social Science Publisher.

● Publishes on behalf of over 250 societies, associations and institutions globally.

● Independent, founder owned.

Page 3: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SAGE-Hindawi

● Partnership with Hindawi Publishing Corporation, based in Egypt.

● Launched a suite of OA titles in the medical and life sciences.

● Low cost experiment with minimal organisational impact.

Page 4: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SOAP Project● Study of Open Access Publishing.

● EC Funded FP7 study into attitudes to OA in the academic communities.

● Approximately 1 million questionnaires, received 38,358 responses.

● Provided some key insights to the HSS community.

Page 5: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 6: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SOAP Results

● ~80% of Social Scientists who published an OA article did so free of charge.

● ~10% of the remainder didn’t know.

● ~5% of the remainder paid less that €250.

● I.e. Only ~5% of SS OA authors had paid a commercially viable rate.

Page 7: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 8: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 9: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 10: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 11: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SAGE Open: Overview

● First broad-scale OA product tailored to the social sciences, behavioral sciences, and humanities.

● Constructive, methodology-based peer-review and continuous, rapid publication.

● New features enable the community to extend peer-review beyond acceptance.

Page 12: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Page 13: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

SAGE Open: YTD Data● Peer-review launched January 1

• 668 submissions • 61 countries

● SJO site (www.sageopen.com) launched May 16 • 32 articles published to date

● 611 Facebook fans

Page 14: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Submissions by Month

020406080

100120140160180

Jan

Feb Mar

AprM

ay Jun Ju

lAug Sep O

ctNov

Page 15: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Published Articles by Month

0

2

4

6

8

10

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Month

Page 16: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Top Countries SubmittingUnited States 188 30%

India 49 8%

Iran, Islamic Republic of 27 4%

Canada 23 4%

Pakistan 16 3%

United Kingdom 13 2%

Nigeria 11 2%

Portugal 10 2%

Page 17: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Top Subjects Submitted

Education 94

Psychology 78

Management 54

Sociology 52

Political Science 46

Communication 43

Economics 25

Humanities 24

Page 18: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Decision Statistics

Decision# of

Manuscripts % of Total

Accept 10 6.8%

Accept Pending Minor Revision

40 27.4%

Immediate Reject 20 13.8%

Major Revision 36 24.7%

Reject 40 27.4%

Page 19: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

1The "Current issue TOC" count is not summed into the monthly total since that count is also included in the "All TOCs" count.2The Robot/Crawler counts are excluded from the Total counts. Produced: August 5, 2011 06:36

SAGE Open YTD Usage Summary

Access Events to May Jun Jul Aug Sep OctTotal YTD

Home Page 6,891 4,624 4,129 16,429 11,854 17,436 61,363

Current issue TOC 0 0 0 33 76 123 232

All TOCs 0 0 0 128 350 520 998

Searches 4,234 1,108 642 1,780 2,279 3,442 13,485

Abstracts 22,771 6,048 4,255 11,812 7,334 9,756 61,976

Full-text HTML 2,431 1,631 1,166 3,446 2,668 3,821 15,163

PDFs 10,516 1,644 1,315 3,106 2,405 3,273 22,259

Data Supplements 0 0 250 224 318 258 1,050

Powerpoint 36 83 47 72 38 86 362

Total1 46,879 15,138 11,804 36,997 27,246 38,592 176,656

Crawler/Robot2 919 1,420 1,729 2,476 1,196 1,601 9,341

Page 20: SAGE Open - London Online #Online11

Los Angeles | London | New DelhiSingapore | Washington DCLondon Online – 1st Dec, 2011

Challenges/ Next Steps:

● Article editors

● Pricing

● Institutional support

● Work with Community to identify most effective way forward