16
Roof Radiation Kira Bartlett, Ashleigh Hough, Jeannie Ossorio BE 4120

Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Roof Radiation Kira Bartlett, Ashleigh Hough, Jeannie Ossorio

BE 4120

Page 2: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Purpose

Investigate the heat transfer due to solar radiation through commonly used roofing materials

Page 3: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Why this Project Topic?There is plenty of research and advertising for the “green” vegetative roofing and “cool” light painted roofing because of their effects on energy efficiency. We wanted to see the effects of regular roofing materials have efficiency.

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/05/green-roofs/klinkenborg-text http://www.jagarchitect.com/leed.html

Page 4: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

The Set Up ● Hobo Data Loggers

o Temperatureo Ambient Airo Solar Radiation

● Types of Roofingo Cedar o Clay o Asphalt o White Tino Tan Tin

Page 5: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Environment● Mix of Sun and Clouds● 73 ⁰F (22.78 ⁰C)● Time: 1:40 pm - 5:45

pm

Page 6: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

MATERIAL ANALYSIS Determining the surface absorptivity (αs) of each material

HOBOs: Surface Temperatures Radiation Flux

DimensionsUsing assumed values for thermal

conductivity (k)

Fourier’s Law:

Solar Irradiation:

Page 7: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS PROCESS (Asphalt)

Fourier’s Law:

Solar Irradiation:

Page 8: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

ANALYSIS OF ASPHALT SHINGLES

Assumed K Value: 0.11 W/mK

Thickness: 0.002 m

q” = 729.85 W/m2K

αS = 0.912

Page 9: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

ANALYSIS OF CEDAR SHINGLESAssumed K Value:

0.12 W/mKThickness:

0.0045 m

q” = 9.687 W/m2K

αS = 0.012

Page 10: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

ANALYSIS OF CLAY ROOFING TILES

Assumed K Value: 0.163 W/mK

Thickness: 0.01 m

q” = 356.7 W/m2K

αS = 0.45

Page 11: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

OVERALL TEMPERATURE COMPARISON

Page 12: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

COMSOL ANALYSIS PROCESSModeled as flat plates using assumed thermal conductivity (k) values

Modeled using steady state conditions (3-4:30 PM)

Boundary ConditionsBS1: Calculated Heat FluxBS2: Constant Temperature

right side → temperature of bottom surface

Compared temperature of the exposed side (left) to temperature from HOBO

Page 13: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

COMSOL ANALYSIS

ASHALT SHINGLES CLAY TILES CEDAR SHINGLES

TS1 = 304.952 KTS2 = 318.211 K

TS1 = 304.944 KTS2 = 310.606 K

TS1 = 304.947 KTS2 = 305.31 K

Page 14: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Real Time vs. COMSOL

Page 15: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

Conclusion ● Tin shingles reflect heat from the sun and they utilize

the dead-air space between the metal ridge and roof deck to minimize some of the heat generated through conduction.

Page 16: Roof Radiation PowerPoint

References Vandervort, Don. "Pros & Cons of Metal Roofing." HomeTips.com. HomeTips, 2015. Web. 25 Apr. 2015.

"Thermo-Physical Properties of Construction Materials | CBERD." CBERD. 2011. Web. 25 Apr. 2015.

Drapcho, Caye. “Appendix A” Handout. Heat and Mass Transport in BE. (Dr. Caye Drapcho). Clemson University. Spring 2015. Print (unpublished).