Upload
virtualpatientseu
View
341
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Repurposing Existing Virtual Patients; an
Anglo-German Case Study
By Chara Balasubramaniam, Jonathan Round, Sophie Vaughan, Terry Poulton, Trupti Bakrania, Benjamin
Hanebeck and Soeren Huwendiek E-Learning Unit, Centre for Medical and Healthcare Education
and the Center for Virtual Patients in Heidelberg
REViP
Repurposing Existing Virtual Patients
•Small One Year case study (Mar 2008 to Feb 2009)•Supported by the JISC RePRODUCE Programme
To develop, run and quality assure technology enhanced courses using reused and repurposed
learning materials sourced externally to the institution
REViP Aims
1. Repurpose 8 Paediatric virtual patients (VPs) from Germany to UK.
2. Embed repurposed VPs within a refreshed SGUL module.
3. Evaluate impact of the resources.
4. Share repurposed VPs with wider community.
What is a Virtual Patient?
“an interactive computer simulation of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose of medical training, education, or assessment”
Ref: An architectural model for MedBiquitous virtual patients by R Ellaway, C Candler, P Greene, V Smothers (2006)
I just killedthe patient!
Repurposing Workflow
Translate linear system German VP to English
1
Test branched system English VP7
Clear any IPR issues6
Identify content to enrich VP5
Storyboard and create additional pathways for branching scenario
4
Adapt VP text for English culture3
Export VP text to MS Word/HTML2
End User Perspectives
•Project Team•Students
Project Team Lessons Learned
• Repurposing existing content from one culture to another is efficient
• Repurposing from one VP structure to another is less efficient
• Repurposing VPs must have an educational purpose and fit
Project Team Views
The key challenges were :• Mapping proposed resources to the curriculum
• Sourcing and recording patient/actor consent
• Choosing an appropriate licensing model
• Capturing and responding to staff and student feedback
• Attracting external reviewers willing to evaluate resources
• Planning appropriate exit and sustainability models
• Documenting the lessons learned and disseminating
Student Views
Overall feedback from students was in favour of VPs.• Focus group (n=3) – Quick and easy-to-use in a safe
environment, and available anytime, anyplace
• Survey 1 (n=12) – 90% of students reported that resources were a worthwhile learning experience
• Survey 2 (n=25) – 88% of students reported that VPs were an effective way to learn knowledge about disease
• Survey 2 (n=25) – 75% of students reported that VPs were an effective way to learn clinical reasoning skills
“...makes learning a bit more interesting, rather than just learning from a textbook. It’s always more helpful going in and seeing cases, and this is a way to do that when there isn’t a patient, or when you just want to sit
in bed with your laptop”
Conclusions
If it’s in a book – most students prefer to use the book
If you can’t get it from a book – students will really value it
You can’t ‘take decisions, and explore consequences’ – in a book
www.elu.sgul.ac.uk/revip(including final report)
Thank You