Upload
faizan-ali
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“You may delay, but Time will not”-Benjamin Franklin
IMPROVEMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY IN A CENTRALIZED WAREHOUSE THROUGH
APPLICATION OF MAYNARD OPERATION SEQUENCE TECHNIQUE (MOST)
Faizan Ali Sayyed, Rishabh Chaudhary,Lakshaman Suthar,Deevyasu Randive,
(Department of Industrial Engineering)
Outline• Abstract• Introduction• Literature• Maynard Operations Sequence Technique (MOST)• Case Study: Company Profile, Working• Case Study: Problems identified, Objective and
Methodology• Conclusion• References
Introduction• In today’s era- difficult to manage the resources and need
to optimize• Manpower utilization • Affect of manpower utilization on profitability• Work measurement• PMTS• History of Work
Literature ReviewYear Scientist Work
1760 Jean Rodolphe Perronet Extensive time studies
1820 Charles W. Babbage Time Study in manufacturing
1881 F. W. Taylor Origin of Time Study
1903 Refined Time Study
1920 F. Gilbreth Motion Study, Micro-motion Study
1938 J.H. Quick, W.J. Shea, R.E. Koehler Work Factor System
1948 H.B. Maynard, G.J. Stegermerten, J.L. Schwab
Methods-time measurement
1972 H.B. Maynard Maynard Operations Sequence Technique
• WFS adds factor to time value to give accurate time standard
• MTM analyzes different elements of manual work• Both are complex, require expertise and knowledge
• MOST: revolutionary, easy to use, faster, universal• Analyze variable factors and allocate appropriate time
values
MOST• Types of MOST:
1. Basic MOST2. Maxi MOST3. Mini MOST 1. 2. 3.
• Sequence of Actions in MOST• General Move (ABG ABP A)
Notations A B G P
Description Action Distance Body Motion Gain Control Placement
• Control Move (ABG MXI A)
• Tool Use (ABG ABP TU ABP A)
Notations A B G M X IDescription Action
DistanceBody
MotionGain
ControlMove
ControlledProcess
TimeAlignment
1 TMU = 0.00001 hour
1 hour = 100,000 TMU
1 TMU = 0.0006 minute
1 minute = 1667 TMU
1 TMU = 0.036 second
1 second = 27.8 TMU
CASE STUDYKomal Foods, Haldiram’s International Limited
Company Profile • Sweets and snacks• Established by Shivkisan Agrawal in 1970• Over 200 different types of products• 13 Plants in Nagpur, 1 central warehouse• Ranked 55th among India's most trusted brands (True Search Advisory)
• Established in 2007• Right next to the biggest Haldiram’s plant Kasana• Covers central India and exports• 120 workers, operates under 16 supervisors • 60,000 live stock daily
Komal Foods Warehouse
WORKING• Layout• Working Process• Techniques used
Layout
Layout for Warehouse, Komal Foods: (a) Ground Floor
• 3 Storey building, Allocation, Dispatch
Online conveyor from Kasana
DP1 DP2 DP3 DP4 DP5
Layout
Fig. Layout for Warehouse, Komal Foods: (a) First Floor
Online conveyor from Kasana
SC1
SC2 SC3 SC4
SC5
SC6
Working Process• Usually 5-6 workers are needed at each dispatch point• Variation in Carton Sizes and weights• Online Conveyor• Order Processing• Material Handling
Fig. a pallet jack, a belt conveyor, and a spiral conveyor
Stocking
Palletizing
Cross check by supervisor
Material Description is checked
Unloading from truck/conveyor
Delivery note is checked
Loading
Quantity check by driver and worker
Material check by Supervisor
Palletizing and Moving stock to dispatch point
Registration (name, Qtty., Truck details, Invoice, etc.)Material
Description is checked
Delivery note is received
Loading and Unloading process at the warehouse
Techniques used
Techniques Used were: Stopwatch Time Study Maynard Operations Sequence Technique
Problems Identified• Occurrence of delay while loading and unloading of
pallets• More production than required• High frequency of accidents• Manual and Orthodox Working style• Lack of flow of information• Lack of training• Space Allocation• Ergonomics: Bend and Arise
OBJECTIVETo find out the problems associated with the delays in movement of goods and propose solutionsTo ensure smooth flow of goods and information
METHODOLOGYStopwatch StudyMOST Study
Stopwatch Study• A 80% rating factor was considered for all the operations,
under the supervision of Warehouse supervisors, and 4% fatigue allowance and 5% personal allowance was considered.
• Normal Time = Observed Time X Rating Factor• Standard Time = Normal Time + Allowances
1. Time study for loading a pallet:(66 observations, 1817 cartons, average weight 12.91 kg observed time 4.71 secs)
Standard time = 4.11 secStandard time for loading a pallet from conveyor (30
cartons) = 123.21
2. Time study for movement of the pallet: (100 observations, 2804 cartons, average distance 41.59 meters, observed time 93.68 average weight 12.68 kgs)
Standard time = 81.62 sec
3. Time study for loading material in a truck, at the dispatch point:
(80 observations, 2,144 cartons, average weight 12.55 kgs, observed time 4.49 seconds)
Standard time = 3.91 secStandard time for loading a pallet into the truck (30
cartons) = 117.3 secArranging the carton in truck requires additional
179.2 seconds Total Loading time = 296.5 sec
MOST Analysis
Activity MOST analysis TMU
Grasp a carton and place at the base of pallet
(A1B0G3 A1B3P3 A0)x6 660
Grasp carton and place above two layers
(A1B0G3 A1B0P3 A0)x6 480
Place with blindness/ obstruction by body adjustment
(A1B0G3 A1B16P6 A0)x3 810
1850*0.036= 66.6 sec
1. MOST analysis for Loading of cartons (30 cartons) on the pallet from the long belt conveyor is as follows:
Activity MOST analysis TMU
Position tiger beneath the pallet and engage the pallet with it.
(A3B0G0 M16X0I1 A0) 200
Push 40m(6-9 steps) (A0B0G0 M16X0I0 A0)X8 1280
Disengage and place pallets
(A0B0G0 M1X0I0 A0) (A0B0G0 A6B0P1 A0)
80
1560*0.036= 56.16 sec
2. MOST analysis for Movement of the pallet from the long belt conveyor to the point of storage is as follows:
(Consider 40m and 30 cartons)
Activity MOST analysis TMU
Get a carton from the top of pallet
(A1B0G3 A3 B0 P1 A1)*12(A1B3G3 A3 B0 P1 A1)*6(A1B6G3 A3 B0 P1 A1)*12
1080720
1800
Push 40m(6-9 steps) (A1B6G3 A6 B6 P1 A6)*16(A1B6G3 A6 B3 P1 A6)*8(A1B6G3 A6 B0 P1 A6)*6
464020801380
(11700/2)*.036=210.6sec
3. MOST analysis for Loading of cartons from the pallet into the truck is as follows
CONCLUSIONComparative Study
Loading of cartons from conveyor
Movement of pallet Loading of cartons into the truck
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Stop watchMOST
Fig. Comparative Graph for Improvement
Time(secs)
Conclusion• Reducing the gap between expected and observed time• Production Planning and Economic Production• Safety of workers as well as products• Flow of information• Automation• Training and Educating the labors
References1. Pramandra G. and Saurabh S.(2012). To improve work force productivity in a
medium size manufacturing enterprise by MOST Technique issuu.com/iosrjen/docs/b02103081
2. A.N.M. Karim, S. T. Tuan, “ Improvement of Workflow and Productivity through Application of Maynard Operation Sequence Technique (MOST)”, Department of Manufacturing and Materials Engineering International Islamic University Malaysia, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bali, Indonesia, January 7 – 9, 2014
3. A Pandey, V S Deshpande, “Application of Maynard Operations Sequence Technique”, Department of Industrial Engineering, Shri Ramdeobaba College Of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, InternationalJournal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology
4. Maynard Operation Sequence Technique at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maynard_Operation_Sequence_Technique ( accessed on May, 2016)
5. Introduction to Work measurement at http://nptel.ac.in/courses/112107142/part1/lecture8.htm ( accessed on May, 2016)
THANK YOUAny Questions?