Upload
enrico-deangelis
View
139
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Notes for PhD candidates and the Board of the ABCPhD Program. See also my blog here: https://beep.metid.polimi.it/web/abcphd/blog/-/blogs/research-metrics-and-excellence-in-uk-and-italy
Citation preview
L’attività di ricercae i suoi risultatiin italia, UK etc.
Note di enrico de angelis 14-01-14
GIIndex 2013 Elsevier 2013
Italy
Italia e GII
Su circa 140 paesi– Siamo 29imi per
innovation output– Siamo 28imi per
innovation input– Siamo 62imi per
innovation efficiency
GIIndex 2013
Paesi migliori:1. CH – Svizzera2. SE – Svezia3. GB – Regno Unito4. NL – Olanda5. US – Stati Uniti6. FI – Finlandia7. HK – Hong Kong8. SG – Singapore9. DK – Danimarca10. IE – Irlanda11. CA – Canada12. LU – Lussemburgo13. IS – Islanda14. IL – Israele15. DE – Germania
ItalyGIIndex 2013
Paesi migliori:16. NO – Norvegia17. NZ – Nuova Zelanda18. KR – Corea del sud19. AU – Australia20. FR – Francia21. BE – Belgio22. JP – Giappone23. AU – Austria24. MT – Malta25. EE – Estonia26. ES – Spagna27. CY – Cipro28. CZ – Cechia29. IT – Italia 30. SI – Slovenia31. HU – Ungheria32. MY - Malesia
ItalyGIIndex 2013
Si noti l’impegno di spesa del nostro Paese rispetto al PIL (GDP):UK = 1,4 ITA e DEU = 2,2 ITA
Risorse economiche
Elsevier 2013
Ricercatori
Valore assoluto del personale dedicato alla ricerca nei Paesi analizzati dal rapporto Elsevier2013
Elsevier 2013
Dottorandi
Valore assoluto del numero di dottorandi nei Paesi analizzati dal rapporto Elsevier2013
Si noti• crescita: USA/CHI/UK• Decrescita: ITA/JPN• Valore assoluto:
UK=2ITADEU=3ITA
Elsevier 2013
Evaluation of research performance
RESEARCH OUTPUT• Number of peer reviewed publications (world share)
«in research fields in which journal articles are not the predominant form of output, such as the Humanities, such indicators may be an imperfect reflection of the totality of research activity».
Elsevier 2013
Share of world articles
Elsevier 2013
Share of world articles
We growBut others growmore than us
Elsevier 2013
Evaluation of research performance
RESEARCH OUTPUT• Number of peer reviewed publications• Activity index: is the ratio between the country’s share
of its total article output across subject field relative to the global share of articles in the same subject field. For example, in 2012 the UK published 37.1% of its articles in the Clinical Sciences, while globally this subject field represents just 29.3% of all articles published. The Activity Index for the UK in Clinical Sciences in 2012 is therefore 37.1% / 29.3% = 1.27.
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
OUR RESEARCH focus more than average on health, humanities, business and social science; less than average in engineering and sciences.
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
Also US lost positions in the last 10 years (except clinical and social sciences
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
ACTI
VITY
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
Evaluation of research performance
RESEARCH OUTPUT• Number of peer reviewed articles• Activity index• Number of citations published articles received from
other articles (world share): «It is a proxy of the quality or importance of the reported research». In 2012:– UK produced 6.4% of global articles, with a share of global
citations about 11.6%– ITA produced 3.7% with a share of near 6.0%– US citation share has continually decreased in this period,
compensated by the rise of China and to a lesser extent Germany, France and Italy. Elsevier 2013
Citation share
Elsevier 2013
Citation share
We grow as UK
Elsevier 2013
Evaluation of research performance
RESEARCH OUTPUT• Number of peer reviewed articles• Activity index• Number of citations published articles received• Field-weighted citation impact: It is one of the most
sophisticated indicators in the modern bibliometric toolkit and compares the actual number of citations received by an article with the expected number of citations for articles of the same document type, publication year and subject field.
Elsevier 2013
Field Weighted citation impact
We have grownreally a lot (as UK)
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
Also US lost positions in the last 10 years (except clinical and social sciences)
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
2012
2002
FIEL
D W
EIG
HTE
DCI
TATI
ON
IND
EX
Elsevier 2013
Evaluation of research performance
RESEARCH OUTPUT• Number of peer reviewed articles• Activity index• Number of citations published articles received• Field-weighted citation impact• Number of highly-cited articles (world share of top 1%
articles).
Elsevier 2013
Highly-cited article share
Elsevier 2013
Highly-cited article share
We grew a lotonly recently
Elsevier 2013
Elsevier 2013
Research Productivity
• Articles per Global Expenditure in Research and Development (GERD) in million dollars
Elsevier 2013
Research Productivity
• Articles per million dollars GERD• Citations per million dollars GERD
Elsevier 2013
Research Productivity
• Articles per million dollars GERD• Citations per million dollars GERD• Articles per researcher• Citations per researcher
Elsevier 2013
Elsevier 2013
Elsevier 2013
Researchers’ mobilityForeign researchers inland
+Native working abroad
native working abroadfor at least 2 years
+foreign researchers
going back or elsewhere
The reference is publishing activity during period is 1996-2012
Researchers from other countries for at least 2 yr
+Native coming back
Sedentary
Canada 27.0%UK 28.4%Germany 36.3%France 36.7%US 46.8%Italy 51.9%Japan 60.0%China 71.1%
Elsevier 2013
Researchers’ mobility
SedentaryTotal
Transitory
Canada 27.0% 50.0%UK 28.4% 49.5%Germany 36.3% 44.8%France 36.7% 46.8%US 46.8% 35.6%Italy 51.9% 36.7%Japan 60.0% 29.4%China 71.1% 17.8%
Foreign researchers working in the country+
Native working abroad(for less than 2 years)
The reference is publishing activity during period is 1996-2012
Elsevier 2013
Researchers’ mobility
SedentaryTotal
TransitoryTotal
Outflow
Canada 27.0% 50.0% 12.5%
UK 28.4% 49.5% 12.7%
Germany 36.3% 44.8% 10.7%
France 36.7% 46.8% 8.6%
US 46.8% 35.6% 9.7%
Italy 51.9% 36.7% 5.9%
Japan 60.0% 29.4% 5.5%
China 71.1% 17.8% 4.1%
native working abroad +
foreign researchers going back or elsewhere(for more than 2 years)
The reference is publishing activity during period is 1996-2012
Elsevier 2013
Researchers’ mobility
SedentaryTotal
TransitoryTotal
OutflowTotal
Inflow
Canada 27.0% 50.0% 12.5% 10.5%
UK 28.4% 49.5% 12.7% 9.4%
Germany 36.3% 44.8% 10.7% 8.2%
France 36.7% 46.8% 8.6% 7.9%
US 46.8% 35.6% 9.7% 7.9%
Italy 51.9% 36.7% 5.9% 5.5%
Japan 60.0% 29.4% 5.5% 5.1%
China 71.1% 17.8% 4.1% 7.0%
The reference is publishing activity during period is 1996-2012
Researchers from other countries+
Native coming back(for more than 2 years)
Elsevier 2013
Researchers’ mobility
SedentaryTotal
TransitoryTotal
OutflowTotal
InflowNet Total Outflow
Canada 27.0% 50.0% 12.5% 10.5% 2.0%
UK 28.4% 49.5% 12.7% 9.4% 3.3%
Germany 36.3% 44.8% 10.7% 8.2% 2.6%
France 36.7% 46.8% 8.6% 7.9% 0.7%
US 46.8% 35.6% 9.7% 7.9% 1.8%
Italy 51.9% 36.7% 5.9% 5.5% 0.4%
Japan 60.0% 29.4% 5.5% 5.1% 0.4%
China 71.1% 17.8% 4.1% 7.0% -2.9%
The reference is publishing activity during period is 1996-2012
Researchers from other countries for at least 2 yr+
Native coming back
Elsevier 2013