Upload
tae-shin
View
3.164
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at the 2009 Conference on the Teaching of Educational Psychology, Toronto, Canada
1
Reflections on TeachingReflections on Learning
Punya Mishra, Matthew J. Koehler, *Tae S. Shin, Megan C. Fedor, Andrea P. Francis, Mike DeSchryver, & Anne E. Heintz
Michigan State UniversityEducational Psychology and Educational Technology
*[email protected]/~shintae
2
Overview
•Course Description•Course Objectives•Innovative Aspects•Students’ Learning•Research Findings•Instructors’ Learning
3
TE 150: Reflections on Learning•An introductory Educational Psychology
course offered fully online at Michigan State University▫Course Management System: Moodle
•Faculty instructors & teaching assistants•Focuses on:
▫Processes and Contexts of Learning▫Major Learning Theories: Behaviorism, Cognitive,
Social-Cognitive, Motivational, Developmental Perspectives
▫Connections between Learning Theories and Learning Contexts
4
Course Overview
5
Course Web Site
6
Assignments
7
Participation• Postings
▫ Grading Criteria The post uses the
vocabulary of the unit.• Discussions
▫ Grading Criteria Talk about two or more
topics Address or cite a specific part of two or more classmates’ post
Introduce new ideas or questions for discussion about the topic
Use a resource beyond those provided in the course, cites it
8
Quizzes/Polls• Quizzes
▫ 5 items▫ 2 tries
• Polls▫ “What do you think?”▫ Results
9
Book Review• Part I
▫ Summary
• Part II▫ Application
10
Interview• Individual Work
▫ Interview
• Group Work▫ Small Groups▫ Collaborative Writing
11
Course Objectives
1. To ensure all of the learning principles presented would connect with the students in a sound and meaningful way
2. To move away from a course that privileged learning as what happens with teachers in classrooms towards a course about learning and development in a variety of contexts
3. To construct an engaging and memorable learning experience for students
12
Course Objective 1
• To ensure all of the learning principles presented would connect with the students in a sound and meaningful way
• The Movie Montage
▫ Interpretations of the educational elements in the movie clips
▫ Module 1 & Module 8
13
Course Objective 2
• To move away from a course that privileged learning as what happens with teachers in classrooms towards a course about learning and development in a variety of contexts
• The Magic Trick
▫ Whack on a side of the head
14
Course Objective 3
• To construct an engaging and memorable learning experience for students
• The Schema Theory Experiments
▫ The Wrestling Match▫ The Prison Escape
15
Innovative Aspects of TE 150
1. Course Design
2. Creative Use of Multiple Media Formats
3. Theoretical and Conceptual Knowledge of the Design of Technology for Teaching
16
Course Design
• To make TE 150 web site dynamic, easy to use, and capture the excitement and fun that we wanted to convey
• Moodle
▫ Discussion Board Setting
17
Creative Use of Multiple Media Formats
▫ Video clips, Flash based magic tricks, games, experiments, Wikipedia, & Internet search
• YouTube Clip
▫ Witnessing a Car Crash
18
Theoretical and Conceptual Knowledge of the Design of Technology for Teaching
• Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)▫ Mishra & Koehler (2006)▫ http://www.tpck.org
• A grand design experiment that we seek to improve iteratively with every offering of the course▫ New Technology
19
Students’ Learning
•Quiz Scores▫Monitoring of students’ learning
•Analysis of the Video Montage at the Beginning and End of the Course
•Book Review and Interview Assignment•End of Semester Survey Evaluation
▫Teaching themselves▫Multimedia approach to learning
20
Research Projects•Facebook vs. Moodle
▫ DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Francis, A.P. (2009, March). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for Discussions in an Online Course Enhance Perceived Social Presence and Student Interaction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Charleston, NC.
•Google Docs. vs. Moodle▫ Gao, F. (2009). Fostering focused online discussions. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
•Student Rationales vs. Instructor Rationales▫ Shin, T. S. (dissertation proposal approved). The Effects of Providing a
Rationale for Learning a Lesson on Students’ Motivation and Learning in Online Learning Environments.
21
Facebook vs. Moodle• Two online undergraduate
Educational Psychology courses• Both courses hosted in Moodle• Student Discussions:
• One course used Moodle forums
• One course linked to Facebook group discussion board
• Compared frequency/length of student interaction & students’ perceived social presence
22
Facebook vs. Moodle
• Statistically insignificant differences• No significant differences reported by surveys of social presence, either
23
Google Docs vs. Moodle• Two online undergraduate
Educational Psychology courses• Both courses hosted in Moodle• Student Discussions:
• One course used Moodle forums
• One course linked to Google Docs
• Compared percentage of text-focused discussion
24
Google Docs vs. Moodle
• more direct focus on the text in the Google Docs format
25
Student vs. Instructor Rationales• Value Aspects of Motivation (Brophy, 2008)• Two Types of Rationales
▫Student Rationales: a brief testimonial of a former student
▫Instructor Rationales: a statement by the instructors, • The rationales will be given at the beginnings of six
two-week modules• Measures
▫Motivation: value, interest, self-determination, autonomous regulation
▫Learning: quiz scores, grades, students’ postings, perceived learning
26
Instructors’ Learning•Diversity of students
▫Non-traditional students, non-education majors, students with special needs, honors students
•Multiple instructors with various expertise▫Motivation
Carol Dweck’s interview clip An Excerpt from Jere Brophy’s book
•Great Potential▫2008 MSU-AT&T Instructional Technology Award ▫Expanding sections (from 2 to 4)
27
Thank you!