Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Anna Clements as part of the Digital Curation Centre's Round Table: "How can other stakeholders support repositories on research data", which was led by Anna Clements, University of St Andrews; Angus Whyte, Digital Curation Centre; Robin Rice, University of Edinburgh; Sarah Jones, Digital Curation Centre. . The Round Table took place on Friday 2nd August 2013 at Repository Fringe 2013
Citation preview
C4D Workshop, Glasgow and London. July 2013
Anna ClementsUniversity of St Andrews
REPOFRINGE 2013 Round TableAugust 2nd 2013
RDM : Who’s driving
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Who’s driving?
• Funders & Policy Makers• Institutions• Researchers• Other …
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Funders & Policy Makers
UK Government/BIS Open Data White Paper, Finch
Royal Society ‘Science as a Public Enterprise’
RCUK Common Principles, EPSRC Framework, OA Policy
HEFCE REF2020
EU Horizon2020, OpenAire
US Government Executive Order
US Funders NSF, NIH
G8 Open Data Charter
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Who What & When Reference
UK Government(BIS)
Open Data White Paper, June 2012Research Transparency Sector Board announced to ‘.. consider how we open up publicly funded research data in a way that maximises public benefit.’
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78946/CM8353_acc.pdf
Finch Report, June 2012‘the infrastructure of subject and institutional repositories should be developed so that they play a valuable role complementary to formal publishing, particularly in providing access to research data and to grey literature, and in digital preservation;’
http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
Royal Society Science as a Public Enterprise, June 2012‘ Publishing data in a reusable form to support findings must be mandatory’
http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Who What & When Reference
Research Councils
Common Principles on Data Policy, 2011
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/DataPolicy.aspx
EPSRC Policy Framework on Research Data, May 2011
http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/about/standards/researchdata/Pages/policyframework.aspx
Open Access Policy, 1st April 2013‘All papers must include details of the funding that supported the research and, if applicable, a statement on how the underlying research materials – such as data, samples or models – can be accessed.’
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf
HEFCE REF2020 Open Consultation, July 2013‘.. we do not consider it feasible at present to make access to data a formal requirement in a post-2014 REF.’
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201316/#d.en.82765
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Who What & When Reference
Wellcome Trust Policy on data management and sharing, Aug 2010
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTX035043.htm
Cancer Research UK
Policy on data sharing and preservation, 2009
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/science/funding/terms-conditions/funding-policies/policy-data-sharing/
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
Who What & When Reference
EU Horizon 2020[Starts 2014]
Horizon 2020 FAQs, Oct 2012‘.. to develop a pilot on open access to data, primarily those data underlying (open access) scientific publications.’
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/background-paper-open-access-october-2012_en.pdf
OpenAire/Liber/COAR data pilot, July 2013
https://www.openaire.eu/en/about-openaire/publications-presentations/publications/doc_details/585-horizon2020opendatapilot20130703finalUS Government Obama Executive Order on Open
Data, 9th May 2013http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/executive-order-making-open-and-machine-readable-new-default-government-
US Funders NIH and NSF data sharing policies http://www.nlm.nih.gov/NIHbmic/nih_data_sharing_policies.htmlhttp://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jspG8 Open Data Charter, June 2013
‘Open by default’ principlehttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-data-charter
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
• Research Strategy* public good * competition for funds, researchers, students
• Mission Groups• Regional • (Dis)Incentives for staff
* Performance reviews
Institutions
RepoFringe, August 2nd 2013, Edinburgh
• Proactive – can see the benefits; encouraging others
• Reactive – Fear of reduced funding; falling behind peers; tied to
promotion prospects• Generational differences• Discipline differences• Academies and Societies• Journal data policies
– http://jordproject.wordpress.com– http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html
Researchers
![RDM [module] RDM-[module]-1… · medium rdm-[module]-15 aheeehapkfgloppjljhoekmmlaanogfkbpaheeeha bnfffnbpepadepelacadbhecbkjpbhfgnpbnfffnb jaibeeflfohfjhjkaphgbjahblpaggncggelagnep](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5fa322a37cebb95cfe55ebc7/rdm-module-rdm-module-1-medium-rdm-module-15-aheeehapkfgloppjljhoekmmlaanogfkbpaheeeha.jpg)
