Upload
michael-hart
View
261
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Topics include: • What do we know about cognitive processing and dyslexia? • WISC IV IQ Test Overview • What do those subtests measure anyway? • Common patterns in scores across and within indices • Dyslexia, working memory and processing speed • How to think about discrepancies between IQ and achievement tests • Interpreting eligibility for Spec Ed Services • In light of RTI, IDEA and the discrepancy model
Citation preview
Q&A: ED TESTING AND DYSLEXIA
Presented by
Michael Hart, Ph.D.
Tuesday, February 25, 2013
2
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
INTRODUCTION
Be not afraid! This is not rocket science You will become an expert on your
child’s profile; you do not have to become an expert on everybody’s profile
What is legally important to advocate within your schools?
What is clinically important in order to plan remediation for your child?
3
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
AGENDA
What do we know about cognitive processing and dyslexia?
WISC IV IQ Test Overview What do those subtests measure anyway? Common patterns in scores across and within
indices Dyslexia, working memory and processing speed Q’s on the fly
How to think about discrepancies between IQ and achievement tests
Interpreting eligibility for Spec Ed Services In light of RTI, IDEA and the discrepancy model
4
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
COMMON COGNITIVE PROCESSING WEAKNESSES IN DYSLEXIC PEOPLE
Most dyslexic students present with deficits in one, many, or all of these areas.
Phonological processing Long-term retrieval (specifically rapid
automatic naming or RAN) Verbal working memory Processing speed in general Executive functioning and attentional
abilities
5
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
HOW THE WISC IV IS STRUCTURED
SimilaritiesVocabulary
ComprehensionInformation
Word Reasoning
Block DesignPicture ConceptsMatrix Reasoning
Picture Completion
Digit SpanLetter-Number
SequencingArithmetic
Coding Symbol Search
Cancellation
FSIQ
Verbal Comprehension Index Perceptual Reasoning Index
Working Memory Index Processing Speed Index
6
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
WHAT DO THE INDICES MEASURE?
Verbal Comprehension Reasoning, concept formation, what you learn
from your environment
Perceptual Reasoning Spatial processing, visual-motor integration
Working Memory Ability to temporarily retain information and
perform some operation with the information
Processing Speed Quickly scan or sequence visually BUT…Coding
7
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
WISC IV VERBAL COMPREHENSION SUBTESTS
Similarities measures verbal reasoning and concept formation. It also involves auditory comprehension, memory, distinction between nonessential and essential features, and verbal expression. This test requires the child to identify the similarity between two ostensibly dissimilar items (words presented orally to the child)
Vocabulary measures the child’s word knowledge and verbal concept formation. For the picture items, the child is required to name the pictures in the stimulus book. For the verbal items, the child is required to give definitions for words the examiner reads aloud.
Comprehension measures the child’s verbal reasoning and conceptualization, verbal comprehension, and verbal expression. This test requires the child to answer questions based on his or her understanding of general principles and social situations.
8
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
WISC IV PERCEPTUAL REASONING SUBTESTS
Block Design measures the child’s ability to analyze and synthesize abstract visual stimuli. This test requires the child to view a constructed model or a picture in the stimulus book, and use red-and-white blocks to re-create the design within a specified time limit.
Picture Concepts measures abstract, categorical reasoning ability. The child is presented with two or three rows of pictures and chooses one picture from each row to form a group with a common characteristic.
Matrix Reasoning measures fluid intelligence and provides a reliable estimate of general nonverbal intelligence. This test requires the child to view an incomplete matrix and select the missing portion from 5 response options.
9
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
WISC IV WORKING MEMORY SUBTESTS
Digit Span measures auditory short-term memory, sequencing skills, attention, and concentration. The Digit Span Forward task requires the child to repeat numbers in the same order as read aloud by the examiner. Digit Span Backward requires the child to repeat the numbers in the reverse order of that presented by the examiner.
Letter-Number Sequencing measures sequencing, mental manipulation, attention, short-term auditory memory, visual-spatial imaging, and processing speed. It requires the child to read a sequence of letters and numbers and recall the numbers in ascending order and the letters in alphabetical order.
10
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
PROCESSING SPEED INDEX
Coding measures the child’s short-term memory, learning ability, visual perception, visual-motor coordination, visual scanning ability, cognitive flexibility, attention, and motivation. It requires the child to copy symbols that are paired with simple geometric shapes or numbers.
Symbol Search measures processing speed, short-term visual memory, visual-motor coordination, cognitive flexibility, visual discrimination, and concentration. This test requires the child to scan a search group and indicate whether the target symbol(s) matches any of the symbols in the search group within a specified time limit.
11
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
HOW TO THINK ABOUT DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN IQ AND
ACHIEVEMENT TESTS
Considerable variability in subtest scores impacts validity of discrepancy model…on both the cognitive assessment and academic achievement side.
All data must be used from the evaluation to come to a conclusion about cognitive processing weaknesses.
The clear and emerging importance of understandable cognitive processing (esp. phonological processing) in determining FAPE.
12
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
INTERPRETING ELIGIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ED SERVICES
History Lesson
The Federal IDEA’s disability terms and definitions GUIDE how States define disability and eligibility Oblique, diaphanous
Changes to IDEA in 2006
Movement away from cognitive processing criteria to attainment of grade-level standards LDA Feb 2010 White Paper
www.ldaamerica.org
13
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
ASSESSING “SLD” BY TESTING FOR UNDERACHIEVEMENT IN ONE OR MORE AREAS
Oral expression Listening comprehension Written expression Basic reading skills Reading fluency skills Reading comprehension Mathematics calculation Mathematics problem solving
14
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
INTERPRETING ELIGIBILITY FOR SPECIAL ED SERVICES (CON’T)
NOW…Evaluation includes Response to Intervention as a Procedure
Ex: TN 6th – 8th graders deadline July 1, 2015
States must NOT REQUIRE the use of discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement
States must PERMIT child’s response to RTI States MAY permit the use of other research-
based procedures…i.e., cognitive processing testing
15
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
THE IRONY: WHAT DISCREPANCY?
If you don’t know what you’re testing for, it’s obviously not there.
16
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
TENNESSEE LAW RE: ELIGIBILITY
The Discrepancy Method of Identification concludes there is a severe discrepancy between educational performance and predicted achievement that is based on the best measure of cognitive ability
Defined by at least 1.5 Standard Deviations (considering Standard Error of the Estimate) when utilizing regression-based discrepancy analyses described in Tennessee's guidelines for evaluation of Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD Assessment Resource Packet)
17
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
IMPRESSIVE RESOURCE PACKET
Specific Learning Disabilities Evaluation: Procedural Addendum B Discrepancy and Processing Deficits
http://www.state.tn.us/education/speced/doc/71309SLDEval.pdf
See page 9
18
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES EVALUATION: PROCEDURAL ADDENDUM B DISCREPANCY AND PROCESSING DEFICITS
“Occasionally there will not be a significant discrepancy between the best measure of
cognitive ability and academic achievement (as defined in the SLD standards), although there will be reliable and valid evidence of a
significant cognitive processing disorder (evidenced by a discrepancy among subtest
standard scores across the battery, thus preventing the measurable discrepancy
between ability and achievement). “
19
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
CHALLENGES
What is legally important as you engage the public school system to obtain services? Can you agree on a proper score for cognitive ability? Were the right tests done to begin with? How do you best calculate 1.5 SD discrepancy? If
not…
What is clinically important for you as you plan remediation for your child? Educational Technology
How are you going to protect your child’s heart and soul?
20
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
21
Copyrig
ht D
rMich
aelH
art.co
m A
ll rights
rese
rved.
Thank You!Contact me at:
www.doctormichaelhart.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Michael-Hart/369431536476530?ref=hl
https://twitter.com/drmichaelhart