BY:NOVIYANTI

116030117011011

PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS“WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY

IN MALANG CITY”

List of Presentation

Background

Public Policy Analysis

Recommendation

… BACKGROUND …

Population GrowthDevelopment

Environmental Damage

Increasing the volume of waste

Waste Problem

MALANG1. The amount of waste is not

transported as much as 3240 cubic meters of the total waste volume (259,636 cubic meters).

2. Area of landfill Supiturang in Malang city is 25% of the 15 acres to accommodate the waste in the city of Malang.

3. The volume of waste in Malang is 400 tons / day.

Law 18 of 2008 on Waste Management

… Public Policy Analysis …

Public policy analysis used was based on the theory of public policy analysis, CV Patton & DS Sawicki (1986).1. Verify, define, detail the problems2. Establish evaluation criteria3. Identify alternative policies4. Evaluate alternative policies5. Display and select among alternative

policies6. Monitor policies outcomes

1. Verify, define, detail the problems

Waste Problem

Waste Management:Sanitary Landfill

Human Resources

Infrastructure

Community Empowerme

nt

Technology

The availability of the trash, trucks, wheelie bins

Public awareness to process / recycle waste

Waste recycling systems, process waste into electrical energy

The lack of a janitor and a cadre of environmental experts in the field

Cost Every ton of waste managed in need of funds Rp75,000 per day, while the volume of waste Malang city reach 400 tons per day.

Thus, the government needs funds Rp30 million per day for waste management

2. Establish evaluation criteria

Net benefit

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Cost

Administrative

3. Identify alternative policies

A. Sanitary LandfillSanitary Landfill is a high tech. Sanitary

landfills are equipped with a system that makes it easy to control waste, such as leachate (waste water is extracted from the waste) so it does not contaminate groundwater; soil cover or overburden and also processing the methane gas extracted out of the trash can be fired electricity.

B. Decentralized waste management, involving the private sector

In Kitakyushu (Japan), garbage collection performed by the government and the contractor. They even arranged the separation and collection of waste

In addition, waste management in Kitakyushu using Takakura basket. It aims to reduce the volume of waste and recycle garbage.

C. Waste management into electrical energy In Monterey (Meksiko), Simeprodeso institution,

successfully managing the waste until it can produce electricity to illuminate the third street lighting.

It takes 11 million dollars, and its profit is 2 million per year.

Incinerator is only consumes 20% of the electrical energy generated, and the remaining 80% sold. But before trash is separated by flammable or not, according to the trash can provided.

D. Garbage Bank

The concept of garbage bank is receiving the waste collected which will then be replaced in the form of money to the community in real terms. But society will receive a savings book containing the recorded amount of money, which later can be used for various purposes, for example: pay the garbage workers, pay his electricity, pay school fees (application of waste bank at school), and others.

4. Evaluate alternative policies

A. Sanitary Landfill

Net Benefit

• Increase the economic value of land.

• Ground water cleanliness can be maintained.

• utilization of electrical energy from methane gas.

Effectiveness

• This system is capable of solving the problem of waste management because it can meet the expectations and preserve the environment and ensure.

Efficiency

• This system is efficient because the facilities in a single system (sanitary landfill) can provide many benefits

Cost

• It needs to raise about Rp 100-200 million per ton. While operational cost is Rp 100-300 thousand per ton per day.

Administrative

• Waste management is not complicated, of any remaining processes not previously used again, it will be processed back to the other benefits.

B. Decentralized waste management, involving the private sector

Net Benefit

• It makes easy the task of the janitor, the separation of waste.

• It reduces waste from households

• It produces compost that can be used personally

• Waste that can be recycled

Effectiveness

• Alternative policy is not very effective, because it reduces the volume of waste at the household level.

Efficiency

• It involves the janitor and the community.

• The technology used is quite simple

Cost

• The government does not need a lot of money by working with the private sector.

Administrative

• There is a determination of the garbage collection day, which is done by the government.

C. Waste management into electrical energy

Net Benefit

• It relieve the government budget in the supply of electricity from the state electricity company.

Effectiveness

• It was not effective. Waste that can not be burned, can not be optimized for recycling.

Efficiency

• It requires sophisticated technology.

• This program does not involve the public and does not require much labor.

Cost

• It requires substantial funds

Administrative

• Administration required is simple enough to implement this policy.

D. Garbage Bank

Net Benefit

• Community gets money from the waste/trash

• Government does not bother to sort garbage from each household

Effectiveness

• This policy is not effective because it only solves the problem of waste that can be recycled.

Efficiency

• Alternative policy is quite efficient because it can empower / utilize existing resources.

Cost

• It does not require substantial funds

Administrative

• Government needs to disseminate to the society about the existence of the garbage bank so the policy will go smoothly.

5. Display and select among alternative policies

Alternative Policies DetailProblem

Sanitary landfill

Decentralized waste

management

Waste into electrical

energyGarbage Bank

Fund(High cost)

- √ - √

Infrastructure - - - -

Community Empowerment

√ √ - √

High Technology

- - - √

Good Quality of Human Resources

√ - √ √

6. Monitor policies outcomes

Modify the existing policy alternative.In practice, sanitary landfill is still quite

difficult to implement, given that the government needs substantial funds and sophisticated technology. Therefore, garbage bank policy should be applied while preparing for cooperation with foreign investors to realize a sanitary landfill. Combination sanitary landfills and garbage bank is an excellent combination of alternative and ideal to apply.

… Recommendation …

Improving internal sector

Improving the community empowerment

Build a network with the private sector