Upload
michael-harding
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Michael HardingProfessor JohnsonCur 528 Week 5Assignment
PRODUCTION TECHNICIAN; LOGIC MODEL EVALUATION
I. RESOURCES:
The Community College of Baltimore County is an accredited college of
the mid-state region of accreditation with campuses in several
communities in the Baltimore metropolitan area and offering Continuing
Education; Workforce Development Programs. Such programs provide
training either through partnership with high industry corporations
based or having facilities in the area or through Anagogical Continuing
Education offerings for enlisted individuals. The campuses are charged
with providing classrooms, internet based networks, computers and
laptops, visual technology, and power supply. The Workforce
Development section has inclusion in its budget for providing necessary
equipment, tools (hand and power) and safety considerations.
Human Resources; provided through the Continuing Education
Department in conjunction with the Workforce Development staff in
enlisting instructors, design professionals, supervisors, evaluation team
(may include administrators, dept. supervisors, designers, instructors,
and staff members) and financial administrators. Workforce
development collaborates with company client’s training departments
and their discipline professionals.
Technology resources; includes a library of subject databases, software,
access to online subject and data sources such as “YouTube” and are
implemented by instructor choice. Any detailed specific software is usually
supplied through client training department or associated resource.
Basic textbooks for subjects; are provided by workforce development
utilizing an outside educational source such as “Pearson Educational Source,”
within their trade/craft skill category; TPC skill series, and also utilizing their
text assessments or tests by instructor’s choice. Other textbook may be used to
focus on specific instruction that may be generalized in TPC series.
II. ACTIVITIES:
Design professionals and instructors are responsible for presenting activities
for student learning in a variety of forms that may include “Hands-on,”
activities primarily, but also the use of PowerPoint presentations, blackboard,
group or team projects, individual projects, trade/craft discussions, and text
reading discussions where students are able to reflect on relevant experiences
and or pass knowledge acquired through other employment or hobby interest.
Students are encouraged to demonstrate techniques and strategies learned that
show competency or proficiency for particular tasks and critical thought for
alternatives and problem-solving. Instructors will observe initial skill levels
and offer feedback on student performance of learned skills from past
experience. Periodical visits from company skilled professionals and
supervisors are invited to create enthusiasm and allow students to ask industry
related questions and workforce related topics to give them a real-world sense.
Also if conditions are in place, student can enjoy visits to actual facility to get
an authentic perspective of work environment and resources. Students are
assess for professional attitude and appropriate courtesy and recognition of
authority that is a critical part of learning and attaining professional and
interpersonal relationships expected by the company. Company
representatives are also in observance of student behavior. Subject matter
attesting to professional behavior is one of the topics for classroom discussion
along with vigilance for environmental safety and co-worker consideration.
Demonstrations of proper use of tools and safety equipment is essential as an
emphasized activity persistently integrated in every applicable instruction.
III. OUTPUTS:
Course monitoring is achieved through textbook chapter assignments
given twice a week in the course of the three days attended in a week
usually on the first day and last day of attendance and are counted and
recorded for completion. Assignments consist of brief end of chapter
questions and or summarize synopsis of main points which students are
assess for depth of response and that they demonstrate a clear
understanding of what they have read. Students are encouraged to
develop good professional conscious habits in terms of tool care,
organizing, cleaning, and respecting their immediate work area and that
of others working close by. Accounting of consistent habit performance
may add or subtract marginally from overall grading. Some instructors
may incorporate daily assertions in a written drill assignment on
blackboards in the classroom at the beginning of class and before
venturing into objective and goals for the session. These drill assignments
are collected and recorded and reviewed for continuity of effort for
developing integrity. Generally, in this course type with the main focus of
instruction encompasses the development of dexterity and hands-on
skills. Instructor autonomy may factor the monitoring of specific
assignments, drills, habits and practices.
IV. SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES:
Skill level proficiency and competency standards describing the
capabilities student candidates should have at a given point in course and
at the completion are outlined by the collaboration of technical experts or
seasoned experience members representing the company training
resource and the school experienced instructors, supervisors and training
or academic counselors employed institutional-wide. Since this course has
been implemented before review of standards determine in industry
technical literature used for previous course and recorded observations
of instructors and informed supervisor were compared and analyzed with
consideration for real-life variables; differences in demographics;
background experience, age, gender, and academic experience are factors
that may have impact the determination of marginal allowances or
consideration for extending projected proficiency time allowance (No
formal statistical data collection were used or found necessary because of
small class roisters not plausible for budget allowance). A decision was
made to extend daily class hours from 3 to 4 hour sessions as for
compensating for challenges student candidates may face in this and
other succeeding courses for timely interventions towards comprehensive
learning. No other alterations were made. Consequently, with the
collaborative efforts of company training professionals (having
experience in training course implementations) and the continuing
education and workforce team and the inclusion of academic
advisors/counselors came to a mutual understanding that review of
selection practices for student candidates was needed. The review analysis
revealed that that assessing methods for mechanical aptitudes and
manual dexterity along with remedial assessments are to be examine for
options. Substantial and believed to be sustainable options were critically
examine and implemented for selection of student candidates for this
schedule course. Instructors and supervisors informed of compared
observational evaluation have had assumptions that these changes are
factors lending to some significant improvement for receiving and
comprehension and performance of skills within projected time limits
associated with particular task proficiency.
V. INPACT OF COURSE :
The program changes for attempt for the attainment of qualified candidates for
ultimately be accepted as new hires in the Lockheed Martin Corporation will
help to increase the successful rate of students to initiate and sustain long
careers at the Baltimore facility. We the participants of the collaborative
efforts of company and team members who worked cooperatively and
diligently will find enthusiasm for possible future courses and curriculums
that can turnout quality skilled and competent technicians for future contract
endeavors. We expect the competency of candidates will be an encouragement
for the setting and achieving of higher goals promoted by the company as
stated by representatives of Lockheed Human Resource department.
Modifications of instruction and itinerary changes are expected to meet the
satisfaction for qualitative and quantitative criteria for production projections
at this interval before the next stage of production needs. The company also
informed candidates of their potential to adapt skills learned at other facilities
within the company having similar needs and can offer relocation benefits.
Still, candidate’s skills are a foundation to develop higher skill levels
qualifying them for applicable consideration of greater compensation.
Development of industry knowledge and acquiring of facility operational
competency can lead to supervisory positions and training leadership. With
this modified course it is expected that confidence in increasing class rosters
will prove to be an advantage learning curve for the company and all involved
leading to greater budget savings for future training that will increase with
each attempt. Overall approval rating has increased by an estimated 10 to 15
percent for all informed stakeholders informed of company activities for
production rates. In all it is the opinion of the Continuing Education and
Workforce Development that this course meet projection and with marginally
more satisfaction than expected.