97
Privatization of Public Education. A Trend in Spain. A way towards inequality José Luis Bernal Agudo Universidad Zaragoza [email protected] http://didac.unizar.es/jlbernal/inicial.html

Privatization public education

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Privatization of Public Education. A Trend in Spain. A way towards inequality .

Citation preview

Page 1: Privatization public education

Privatization of Public Education. A Trend in Spain.A way towards inequality

José Luis Bernal Agudo Universidad [email protected] http://didac.unizar.es/jlbernal/inicial.html

Page 2: Privatization public education
Page 3: Privatization public education

What would be left from public schools in the XXI Century?

We are going towards a school for the gifted, for excellence, empowering the private sector... leaving aside the public and comprehensive school.

Education is open to the markets, to private interest... imposing the neoliberal and neoconservative references.

The privatization processes, visible and explicit as the hidden ones, continue on their way.

Page 4: Privatization public education

Language is never neutral

CompetencesExcellenceResultsControlQualityEffortTalent …

This language form part of a language that is been incorporated at the moment into the educational discourse in a usual way

Page 5: Privatization public education

Privatization in public schools is going to result in an empowering element of inequality in our society.

Capitalism in itself generates inequality, being the State responsible for distributing the riches and compensate the inequalities through the so-called “Welfare State”, essentially in its intervention with education and health.

Through the public school it is possible an equality of opportunities, that compensates the inequalities produce by the capitalist system.

With the actual cuts in healthcare and, most of all, in education, more inequality will be produced.

Page 6: Privatization public education

Some of them are perceived

as natural 

Some of them are hidden in an evil way

It´s necessary to perceive the privatization processes of public education to do that visible!

Page 7: Privatization public education

PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS A MECHANISM OF

SOCIAL COHESIONEDUCATION AS A RIGHT FOR ALL, SOMETHING NOT NEGOTIABLE

Page 8: Privatization public education

The right of education for all, Something non negotiable

•Universal declaration of human rights. ONU 1948.

•Constitution 1978 (Spain). Article 27.1

“Everyone has the right to education”

Page 9: Privatization public education

Through public schools…

Education acts as a mechanism of social cohesion in a free, tolerant and united society

Page 10: Privatization public education

To privatize means to give pieces of power and responsibility to private entities

Education as a public asset to be used by the whole society

Education as a private asset to be used for the

interest of groups with higher level in education,

companies and economy

becomes

Page 11: Privatization public education

AN EXAMPLE Two budget cuts: more students, less teachers

It is a hidden way to privatize education

The ones losing are going to be those students with less possibilities.

Around 80 % of foreign students have enrolled in public school; as a result, the social cohesion and integration mechanism that the public school has became an exclusion mechanism per se.

The middle class will escape those classes where the number of students and their differences don’t permit a proper education

Page 12: Privatization public education

Foreing students

Subsidized private schoolPUBLIC schools Private schools

Foreing students

Foreing students

Foreing students

Page 13: Privatization public education

With privatization one of the most relevant rights acquired in the XX century

will be cancelled out.

What neoliberals defend in an evil way is an equality of possibilities for all, not an

equality of opportunities where the compensation of inequalities, should be

taken as reference.In the 2013 budget the education programmes of

compensatory education lose 116,5 million, meaning, 68 %, until reaching 53 million .

The right of education for all

Page 14: Privatization public education

WAYS OF PRIVATIZING OF THE PUBLIC ASSETS

NEOLIBERAL AND NEOCONSERVATIVE REFERENCES

Page 15: Privatization public education

What are we talking about?

The outsourcing of public responsibilities in different private entities

This privatization can be specified in many ways, but it in all of them the State stops being the direct

responsible of what is done giving this responsibility to private entities o private companies, that became

part of these schools

Page 16: Privatization public education

Its not something isolated…

Privatization of public education is one more element of the whole complex and big process of restructuring of the public and economic ways that specifies the capitalist development.

The brought down of the State as responsible and manager of services as basic as education is one of the objectives of the neoliberal policies, that see privatization and the entrance in the market economy the basic strategies to escape from the crisis.

Page 17: Privatization public education

An example

“...Since this Wednesday, town councils, ministries, communities … with deficit last year and with 5% less than budget, may start a collective dismissal.

... 49.400 jobs destroyed in the public sector in the last quarter" (El País 31/10/12)

Page 18: Privatization public education

Spain Foundation for Social Studies and Analysis

(FAES)

Page 19: Privatization public education

Foundation for Social Studies and Analysis (FAES)Think Tank

FAES is in contact with the main centres of political thought in the United States and works with America’s

leading think tanks.FAES carries out its work in Europe through the European Ideas Network (EIN) and bilateral agreements with other

institutions.

Page 20: Privatization public education

FAES defends the idea that individual freedom is the value enabling every person to advance, achieve objectives and live their life according to their own decisions. Individual freedom also enables society as a whole to evolve and improve. No presumed collective right should ever be placed over individual freedom.

(FAES political principles. http://www.fundacionfaes.org/es/principios_politicos_de_faes)

FAES political principles

Page 21: Privatization public education

Market economy has proved its superiority as a system for allocating resources efficiently, creating wealth, and improving collective prosperity.

Economies with balanced budgets, lower taxes and rational public spending, governed by the principle of minimum public intervention, generate better social results and are more respectful of individual freedoms.

(FAES political principles. http://www.fundacionfaes.org/es/principios_politicos_de_faes)

FAES political principles

Page 22: Privatization public education

FAES political principlesThe new law (LOMCE) is a consequence of these principles

School vouchersThe freedom of physical and legal persons to create schools

Retraining of civil servant Freedom for differentiated salaries Professionalization of the school management

Control by results (Libertad de elección y pluralismo, 2009)

Page 23: Privatization public education

Visible (exogen) Hidden (endogen)

TWO WAYS OF PRIVATIZATION

Entry in the private sector of public education directly

Financing of schools

To incorporate the designs of the public schools, methods and practices of the private sector

New public management

Page 24: Privatization public education

Influence of the new English right in the spanish educative policy

In England and in Spain, the neoconservative and neoliberal forces have tried to impose their criteria and policy, which has result firstly in a brutal free market (neoliberal) and secondly a maintenance of the old values and tradition.

Manuel de Puelles (2005)

Ronald Reagan… Margaret Teacher…Esperanza Aguirre 1980 1988 1996

Page 25: Privatization public education

Neoliberal Neoconservative

The freedom of choice of the school is one of the paradigms, where personal freedom constitutes a value bigger than any collective right

The contents of "Education for the people" making it similar to those values that, according to them, always must prevail.

The same curriculum is imposed for all (increasing the percentage that the State controls, up to 75 % of the total of its contents)

Ones wish that the free market shrinking the State all that they can, others want a State that continues having strength and responsibility.

Page 26: Privatization public education

The visible and the hidden in privatization

Analysis of the acting and measures

Page 27: Privatization public education

Financing of private schools Outsourcing school services (dining,

transportation, extracurricular activities, etc..)

Outsourcing schools

Management: New Public Management

Freedom of choice of school Control by results Cuts in public school Competence programming

Page 28: Privatization public education

Visible Financing of private schools Outsourcing school services

(dining, transportation, extracurricular activities, etc..)

Outsourcing schools

Page 29: Privatization public education

Funding private schools

Subsidized private schools

Page 30: Privatization public education

Subsidized private schools

Private Schools

PublicSchoolsP

ub

lic

Pu

bli

cP

riva

teP

riva

te

PublicPublicPrivatePrivate

CO

NT

RO

L A

ND

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

CO

NT

RO

L A

ND

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

FINANCINGFINANCING

Three networksThree networks

X

Page 31: Privatization public education

Features private school

• Total freedom to organize the participation in school

• Complete autonomy in business and performance

• Little State control• Hard competition between schools • The parents choose the school

using market parameters

Page 32: Privatization public education

Features private school

• They receive all from the market

• High class and some middle class

• Elitist education

Page 33: Privatization public education

Features Subsidized private school

• Religious

•Autonomy in business and performance

• Little State control•Competition between schools•The parents choose the

school using three basic criteria of selection

They receive from the State and the market

budget students

Page 34: Privatization public education

They are not always applied in practice, because schools use mechanisms to prevent certain students (immigrants, gypsies….) from enrollment, like charging for uniforms, extracurricular activities, catering, parent associations,…

Three basic criteria of selection:1) proximity of the school

2) family income

3) brothers or sisters already at the school

Page 35: Privatization public education

Features public schoolDemocratic participation

Little autonomy in business and performance

(It tends to change according to market policies )

State controlLittle competition between

schools(It tends to change according to

market policies )

The parents choose the school using three basic criteria of

selection

Page 36: Privatization public education

Features public school

They receive all from the State

Working class and economically distressed parts of the

population

Plural education

Page 37: Privatization public education

Subsidized private schools

They are funded by the state. The State pays the salaries directly to their teachers and brings a sum to the maintenance of the school.

Students come to the same selection criteria as the public

Teachers are selected by public selection

What must be What it is

jose luis bernal
Un ejemplo paradigmático, durante el curso 2011-12 personalmente hice un seguimiento de las plazas convocadas por los centros concertados a lo largo del curso, ya que tienen la obligación de hacerlas públicas. En Aragón lo hacen en la página web de la Consejería de Educación (http://www.educaragon.org/GestionPersonal/ nodo.asp?id=809). A todas las plazas que salían del ámbito de la Educación Física enviaba un curriculum real de una profesora, que cumplía todos los requisitos pedidos con creces. Durante todo el año no llamaron a esta profesora ni un colegio para entrevistarla. ¿Por que? Muy fácil, cuando las plazas se hacían públicas ya estaban concedidas
Page 38: Privatization public education

Funding for subsidized private schools represents a form of privatization explicit and visible

where public money used to fund a completely private school that offers a level playing similar in theory to the public schools (school choice for parents, management bodies ...), but in practice are completely different

Page 39: Privatization public education

The provision of public education is made through public schools and private schools (art. 108.4, LOE)

It opens the way of ideological consideration of a subsidized private schools (private and mostly religious) as a public service.

Subsidized private schools are integrated as part of the public education service, so that where once prevailing ideas as comprehensive school, social justice, etc.. now include other ideas as profitability, results, excellence, individual interest, competition, etc.

Page 40: Privatization public education

We must not forget…

These concessions were consolidated with the socialist government of Felipe González (1982-1996)

With the conservative Aznar government (1996-2004) expanded more

and stayed with the Zapatero government (2004-2011), again with the socialists giving no problem.

In the current bill Rajoy government (2011 - ...), opens the possibility of funding basic vocational training schools and schools with gender differentiation (which until now had been done, but the Constitutional Court has said that it went against the legislation)

Page 41: Privatization public education

New Law LOMCE

LOE “In no case will there be discrimination for reasons of birth, race, gender, religion, opinions or any other personal or social condition or circumstance”.

LOMCE"In no case shall the discrimination of birth, race, sex, religion, opinion or any other condition or personal or social circumstance. The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not preclude education schools differentiated by sex subscribe subsidies…".

Page 42: Privatization public education

We can not ignore the number of students who are enrolled in private schools

 Students Public% Subsidized private % Private%7.914.243 68,2 25,4 6,5

Ed. Inf. 1.912.380 65,1 24,1 10,9 1º ci 443.279 51,7 16,5 31,8 2º ci 1.469.101 69,1 26,3 4,6Prim. 2.795.941 67,6 28,4 4,0EE 31.987 56,8 42,9 0,3ESO 1.791.968 65,9 30,6 3,5PCPI 82.939 77,9 22,0 0,2BACH 685.100 76,0 9,5 14,5FP 613.928 77,7 17,6 4,6

Alumnado según titularidad del centro. Curso 2011-2012. Elaboración propia a partir de MECD (2012:4)

Page 43: Privatization public education

Outsourcing of public schools

Subsidized private schools

Page 44: Privatization public education

The funding of private schools has taken a quality leap in some Autonomous Communities directly privatizing public schools and passing these to private management..

jose luis bernal
José Manuel Boquet, presidente de la Federación de Centros de Enseñanza de Valencia (FECEVAL), en un artículo publicado en El Mundo.es (http://www.elmundo.es/especiales /2011/02/valencia/50colegios/analisis2.html), indicaba que este año hay en el aire, por fin, una propuesta de la administración educativa para acercar la oferta de plazas concertadas a la demanda social: la propuesta de cesión temporal de suelo público para la construcción de nuevos centros concertados, una iniciativa ampliamente experimentada en la Comunidad de Madrid con excelentes resultados. Lógicamente, alababa la propuesta de Madrid y la comparaba con la construcción de centros sanitarios y de atención a la tercera edad, así la administración cede durante un periodo (generalmente de cincuenta a setenta y cinco años) un solar público a una entidad privada, que construye en él un centro escolar que, si cumple con los requisitos legales, será incorporado al régimen de concierto. Cuando el periodo concluya, el centro en funcionamiento, con todo su equipo e instalaciones, pasa a disposición de la administración educativa. La concesión se otorga en base a una licitación en concurso público entre los distintos demandantes de suelo. De este modo, sigue exponiendo en el artículo, se alcanzan dos objetivos: por una parte se resuelve el problema de atender la demanda de todas aquellas familias que, queriendo escolarizar a sus hijos en centros privados concertados, quedan todos los años sin poder ver atendida su solicitud; por otro lado, el ingente esfuerzo económico que supone la construcción simultánea de un número determinado de centros, se reparte entre la inversión privada, liberando así a la administración autonómica de tal carga.
Page 45: Privatization public education

To bind the administrations to subsidize any private school that requested it...

Document PP for the educational pact (2010)

jose luis bernal
José Manuel Boquet, presidente de la Federación de Centros de Enseñanza de Valencia (FECEVAL), en un artículo publicado en El Mundo.es (http://www.elmundo.es/especiales /2011/02/valencia/50colegios/analisis2.html), indicaba que este año hay en el aire, por fin, una propuesta de la administración educativa para acercar la oferta de plazas concertadas a la demanda social: la propuesta de cesión temporal de suelo público para la construcción de nuevos centros concertados, una iniciativa ampliamente experimentada en la Comunidad de Madrid con excelentes resultados. Lógicamente, alababa la propuesta de Madrid y la comparaba con la construcción de centros sanitarios y de atención a la tercera edad, así la administración cede durante un periodo (generalmente de cincuenta a setenta y cinco años) un solar público a una entidad privada, que construye en él un centro escolar que, si cumple con los requisitos legales, será incorporado al régimen de concierto. Cuando el periodo concluya, el centro en funcionamiento, con todo su equipo e instalaciones, pasa a disposición de la administración educativa. La concesión se otorga en base a una licitación en concurso público entre los distintos demandantes de suelo. De este modo, sigue exponiendo en el artículo, se alcanzan dos objetivos: por una parte se resuelve el problema de atender la demanda de todas aquellas familias que, queriendo escolarizar a sus hijos en centros privados concertados, quedan todos los años sin poder ver atendida su solicitud; por otro lado, el ingente esfuerzo económico que supone la construcción simultánea de un número determinado de centros, se reparte entre la inversión privada, liberando así a la administración autonómica de tal carga.
Page 46: Privatization public education

Examples

In May 2008, the local government took the school of the network of public schools to make them subsidized private school

El Álamo school

Page 47: Privatization public education

Examples

In November 2011 began the process of privatization El Carrasquer school in Sueca (Valencia)

Establishing a financial arrangement with a private company to do the

work and give them the school management for 75 years El Carrasquer school

El Carrasquer school

Page 48: Privatization public education

In kindergarten…

Outsourcing of services by public administrations is becoming as common in most communities and cuts in public funding for these schools.

An example is in Aragon, where the Government of Aragon has cut its contribution by 14% for public kindergarten, in addition to a 22% decrease already occurring last year

Page 49: Privatization public education

In Aragón…

This measure is the result of one of the 25 educational strategic objectives for the four years of government that have a conservative government rule ahead by the PP-PAR in Aragon:

"Having in consideration the possibility of subsidies for non-compulsory vocational training

(FP), as the first cycle for children between 0 and 3 years old (Kindergarten) and high school "

Page 50: Privatization public education

Hidden Management: New Public

Management Freedom of choice of school Control by results Cuts in public school Competence programming

Page 51: Privatization public education

School choice

a covert form of privatization

Page 52: Privatization public education

Freedom of choice: neoliberal paradigm

Individual freedom is a value above any collective right.

FAES argues that individual freedom is the value that allows each individual to progress, overcome and manage their life

goals according to their own decisions. The exercise of individual freedom also makes progress and improves the

set of society. No collective right course can ever be above individual freedom.

(FAES political principles. http:// www.fundacionfaes.org/es/

principios_politicos_de_faes)

Page 53: Privatization public education

Control by results

Are judged and judge schools for academic excellence, a test regarding

academic values

Page 54: Privatization public education

It overestimates the visible and measurable, thinking through standardized methods and techniques can measure education

The quantified results from standardized tests represent a quality criteria

Page 55: Privatization public education

PISA AND GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATIONS

It´s used as a political tool There is a political use of these data: Politicization of knowledge

Page 56: Privatization public education

Andalucía: Diagnostic tests (2006, 2007 y 2008)

Percentage of schools with score above 500, according to ISC (socioeconomic and cultural factors)

Merchán Iglesias, F. J. (2012) La introducción en España de la política educativabasada en la gestión empresarial de la escuela: el caso de Andalucía. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 20 (32).

Lower Upper

Page 57: Privatization public education

ACCOUNTABILITY

Now (LOE)General diagnostic evaluations

4º Primary Education2º Compulsory Secondary Education

PISAStudents 15 years old

New law (LOMCE)

3º Primary Education6º Primary EducationPISA

Students 15 years oldGeneral diagnostic evaluations

4º Primary Education2º Compulsory Secondary Education

4º Compulsory Secondary Education: Validation / Final exams2º Bachillerato: Validation / Final exams

Page 58: Privatization public education

ACCOUNTABILITY

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primaria

Universidad

The evaluation criteria will be established by the State Government or Autonomous Communities Government.

GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC

EVALUATIONS

PISA

Page 59: Privatization public education

ACCOUNTABILITY

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primaria

Universidad

GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC

EVALUATIONS

PISA

These evaluations will address the basic competences of the curriculum, will take place in both primary and secondary education. The Sectorial Education Conference will ensure that these evaluations are guided by homogeneous criteria

Page 60: Privatization public education

ACCOUNTABILITY

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primaria

Universidad

GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC

EVALUATIONS

PISA

Since the year 2000, every three years, a randomly selected group of fifteen-year-olds take tests in the key subjects:  reading, mathematics and science, with focus given to one subject in each year of assessment

GENERAL DIAGNOSTIC

EVALUATIONS

Page 61: Privatization public education

STUDENT EVALUATIONS

3º Primary

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primaria

UniversidadThe degree of acquisition of basic skills in math and language communication. Serve to evaluate getting held back in third grade

Page 62: Privatization public education

STUDENT EVALUATIONS

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primary

UniversidadIt will check the degree of acquisition of basic skills and targets of the stage. Its outcome will have informative and guidance character

Page 63: Privatization public education

STUDENT EVALUATIONS

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller

4º ESO

6º Primaria

UniversidadTo obtain the title they will have to pass this final exam. It will be an external examination school

1º Final exams

Page 64: Privatization public education

STUDENT EVALUATIONS

3º Primaria

2º Bachiller4º ESO

6º Primaria

Universidad

To obtain the degree of Bachelor and access to the University they must pass this final exam

2ª Final exams

Page 65: Privatization public education

Five key limitations, standardized evaluations

1. the disregard of components of the real curriculum, which is not necessarily exhausted in the prescribed curriculum

2. the risks of teaching for the test

3. the incentives that are generated to cheat or inflate the results of the tests

4. the lack of consideration of the economic differences of the pupils who are evaluated

5. the limitations of the results of standardized evaluations to predict the labour success of the students

Barrenechea, I. (2010) “Evaluaciones estandarizadas: seis reflexiones críticas”Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 18 (8)

Page 66: Privatization public education

Cuts in public school

The cuts represent a real slaughter for public education and a return to a Franco

school model, elitist and segregating

Page 67: Privatization public education

The cuts represent a real slaughter for public education and a return to a Franco school model, elitist and segregating

Shatter the progress achieved in public education in democracy:

Increased network of public schools Increase teachersLowering the teacher/student ratioExtension of compulsory school age,Universal schooling from three years oldAccess to higher education for everybody

Page 68: Privatization public education

The cuts represent a covert privatization process

The mercantilist ideology ("less state and more market") and privatization involves converting education into a business

Aims to make the public school the private subsidiary. .

Page 69: Privatization public education

FIVE KEY CUTS

Page 70: Privatization public education

Less teachers

For the first time since 1990, public education teachers are lost, increasing students.

In 2011-12 there have been more than 116,000 students, while the number of teachers decreased by 2982

Teachers (Fuente Ministerio Educación)

Public Schools Private Schools

Year 2011-12 493.818 teachers 188.903 teachers

Year 2010-11 496.800 teachers 186.709 teachers

-2982 less teachers +2.194 more teachers

Page 71: Privatization public education

Assault on rural school, eliminating rural school teachers and schools

An example. Rural education (Aragón), Year 2012-13Up to 13 students in a village, there will be a single classroom with children from 3 to 12 years (so far was 10, an increase of 30%)Up to 28 students, 2 classrooms for children from 3 to 12 years (so far was 22, increased by 27%)Up to 47 students, three classrooms from children 3 to 12 years (so far was 37, increased by 27%)

These data will lead to closure of hundreds of classrooms in rural schools

More than 2000 temporary teachers (supply teachers) lose their jobs

Page 72: Privatization public education

Less replacement (over 10 days)

In public schools, the appointment of temporary teachers (supply teachers) take care of a temporary substitution of teachers it will occur only when ten school days have elapsed in result of the situation

The ten school days before the appointment of official temporary teachers (supply teachers)  must be treated with resources of the school.

Real Decreto-ley 14/2012, de 20 de abril, de medidas urgentes de racionalización del gasto público en el ámbito educativo. Art. 4 Sustitución de profesores

Page 73: Privatization public education

Most students (ratio teacher/student)

Public Authorities may extend up to 20% the maximum number of students: up to 30 students in primary education and 35 students in secondary education.

Real Decreto-ley 14/2012, de 20 de abril, de medidas urgentes de racionalización del gasto público en el ámbito educativo. Art. 2

Page 74: Privatization public education

Less funding 2012 Budget 2012 Education, University, Culture and Sports of the

Government of Aragon, for public schools

Infraestructuras no universitarias -24%Infraestructuras universitarias -100%Sustituciones del Personal docente no universitario -54%Gastos de funcionamiento de centros no universitarios -9%Gastos materiales y suministros en centros no universitarios -15%Gastos de funcionamiento de los Centros de Formación de Profesorado (CPR) -64%Libros en primaria en la escuela pública -33%Comedor (ampliado ahora a la concertada) -11%Formación permanente del profesorado no universitario -40%Capítulo de transferencias a Política Educativa y Formación Permanente -84%Convenio con la Universidad de Zaragoza para formación -67%Programas educativos no universitarios -16,5%Plan Aragonés de Formación Profesional -32%Dirección General de Universidades -4%Dirección General de Cultura -21,5%Dirección General de Patrimonio Cultural -34%Dirección General de Deporte -22,5% 

Page 75: Privatization public education

Less funding 2013 Budget 2013 Education

-10,25%

over the previous year

Page 76: Privatization public education

Schools Management: New Public Management

Managing public schools according to the parameters of private

enterprise

Page 77: Privatization public education

Managing public schools within the parameters of the private enterprise, by …

greater financial autonomy that requires private funding due to insufficient funding Public, private interests and introducing trading in public education .

Specialization of schools to offer a competitive and "differentiated" to customers

"Professionalization" of the school management as managers, experts in business management and human resources, which manage public schools "efficiently" and profitability.

Page 78: Privatization public education

Three changes in the new law: LOMCE

An advisory School Boardit loses one of the great achievements of public management

The Selection of head teacher by a committee

Quality schools. Differentiated public schools for advanced students

Page 79: Privatization public education

Quality schoolsThe head teacher may establish specific requirements and merits of the positions offered civil servants

For excellence: High schools for excellence in Madrid. Schools of Excellence and Excellence Classrooms

Page 80: Privatization public education

Competences and education

Competencies has mixed with the obsession of control results, a perfect

blend to introduce learning linked to the economic and business

jose luis bernal
El ministro de Educación, José Ignacio Wert, ha declarado que no solo no hace falta invertir más para mejorar el rendimiento escolar, sino todo lo contrario: "Ayer mismo lo señalaba en una entrevista el profesor de Stanford, Eric Hanushek: 'En realidad, no es que un gobierno invierta más en educación y así tenga mejores alumnos y luego trabajadores más productivos, sino que si se mejora el rendimiento –sobre todo en matemáticas, lectura y escritura– de los estudiantes de un país aumentará su crecimiento económico, lo que es crucial porque permite recortar inversión en educación y al mismo tiempo que mejore el rendimiento de los estudiantes” (El ministro ha hecho estas polémicas declaraciones en el acto de inauguración de la Casa del lector por los Príncipes de Asturias en el centro cultural Matadero de Madrid. (http://sociedad.elpais.com/sociedad/2012/10/17/actualidad/1350477788_668395.html>)
Page 81: Privatization public education

WITH THE CHURCH HAVE ENCOUNTERED

An important variable in Spain

Page 82: Privatization public education

When we talk about private schools in Spain, speak of the church The Catholic Church manages 5347 private and subsidized private schools  (80% of total private schools).

So when we talk about privatization of public education in Spain, have to talk about the church and its importance in our educational system.

Page 83: Privatization public education

Of the 5,698,699 euros for the church, no less than 4.6 million receive their schools

Estimate derived public money to the Catholic Church in 2012 (thousands of euros)

Asignación Tributaria PGE 278.000Otros asignación directa PGE 4.350Subsidies to schools 3.900.000Religion teacher salary 700.000Atención Sanitaria directa 700.000Capellanes diversas instituciones públicas 25.000Cáritas 81.044Manos Unidas 10.304Total 5.698.699

FINANCIACIÓN DE LA IGLESIA CATÓLICA Y GASTO PÚBLICO. INFORME FUNDACIÓN 1º DE MAYO. Abril 2012

Page 84: Privatization public education

José María Maravall told us …

"A few days after entering the Ministry of Education received the visit of the bishops, who brought us printed decrees that we had to sign and publish in the BOE"

(Público.es 11/10/2012)

It is the sign of the influence of the church in education the last century .

Education was used as a political tool during this time

Page 85: Privatization public education

In the Catholic Church the transition ensures their privileges by the Constitution and the Agreement between the Spanish State and the Holy See:

Catholic religion class: Mandatory for all schools, although voluntary for students

The teaching of the catholic religion "will be held in conditions comparable to other fundamental disciplines"

Teachers of religion are elected by the Church and paid with public money

The Church hierarchy design the content of the subject of religion

In teacher training courses catholic religion will exist at least in an elective way

Page 86: Privatization public education

Facts to confirm

Revenues of the Catholic Church since 2001 have been growing relevant .

In times of crisis, from 241,327,321 in 2007 to 278,000,000 in 2011, while contributions to public school have been decreasing.

In the 2013 budget the education programmes of compensatory education lose 116,5 million,

meaning, 68 %, until reaching 53 million .

Page 87: Privatization public education

The historical evolution of the income received by the Catholic Church in the State Budget

Year Tax allocation

2001 107.289.393

2002 105.692.430

2003 115.715.090

2004 116.484.271

2005 128.682.326

2006 sd

2007 241.327.321

2008 252.682.542

2009 249.456.822

2010 260.000.000

2011 278.000.000Fuentes: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda 2009-2012),

Conferencia Episcopal (2006-2008) yhttp://www.portantas.org/index.php/la-financiacion-de-la-

iglesia.htmlFINANCIACIÓN DE LA IGLESIA CATÓLICA Y GASTO PÚBLICO. INFORME FUNDACIÓN 1º DE MAYO. Abril 2012

THE CRISIS ISN´T FOR ALL

Page 88: Privatization public education

TO FINISH …

This process of privatization of the public hides segregation and dismantling of the public schools.

Page 89: Privatization public education

Reflects two actions

The incompetence, slackness and carelessness of the PSOE, as they been in power, to face a total separation of the church and the State.

The intention of the conservative parties to dismantle the public school and encourage the private school, especially the subsidized private schools

Page 90: Privatization public education

From postulates neoliberals and neoconservatives, have developed policies ...

promoted by conservative parties

developed by social democratic parties

Page 91: Privatization public education

They give the impression that they don´t know what they are talking about. It is a deliberate policy, calculated and at times very clear.

It´s about letting the public school starve. It´s not necessary even to attack it with specific measures; they are left to die slowly with associated structural measures, according to them, to the crisis.

Page 92: Privatization public education

What is at stake, not only pedagogical matters, but on a model that has cost efforts to build throughout the twentieth century

Page 93: Privatization public education

TO FINISH with this presentation

Page 94: Privatization public education

The world is the one to buy

Page 95: Privatization public education
Page 96: Privatization public education

Education isn´t for saleEducation has to be

protected

Page 97: Privatization public education

IT´S ALL

Thanks