27
A NEW FUTURE FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS: EXCELLENCE, ACCESS & EXCELLENCE 2016 NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DIRECTORS CRYSTAL CITY, VIRGINIA OCTOBER 5, 2016 LIBIA SOCORRO GIL, PH.D. ASSISTANT DEPUTY SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR, OELA

Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

A NEW FUTURE FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS:EXCELLENCE, ACCESS & EXCELLENCE

2016 NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DIRECTORS CRYSTAL CITY, VIRGINIA

OCTOBER 5, 2016

LIBIA SOCORRO GIL, PH.D.ASSISTANT DEPUTY SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR, OELA

Page 2: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

OVERVIEW

• English Learner Profile Update National Growth Performance Trends

• Equity and Opportunity Civil Rights - Access NPD Profile

• Moving Forward ESSA and ELs Other Resources

2

Page 3: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN NUMBER OF ELs, BY STATE:

SYs 2004-05 TO 2013-14

3 0116

Sources: U.S. Department of Education, 2008-10 Biennial Report to Congress and Consolidated State Performance Reports, SYs 2010-11 and 2013-14.

Page 4: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NUMBERS OF K-12 ELs: SYs 2002-03 TO 2013-14

4

Source: U.S. Department of Education, 2010-12 Biennial Report to Congress, and Consolidated State Performance Reports, SYs 2012-13 and 2013-14.

0116

2 0 0 2 -0 3 2 0 0 3 -0 4 2 0 0 4 -0 5 2 0 0 5 -0 6 2 0 0 6 -0 7 2 0 0 7 -0 8 2 0 0 8 -0 9 2 0 0 9 -1 0 2 0 1 0 - 1 1 2 0 1 1 -1 2 2 0 1 2 -1 3 2 0 1 3 -1 43,800,000

4,000,000

4,200,000

4,400,000

4,600,000

4,800,000

5,000,000

4,340,0064,317,002

4,252,376

4,400,100

4,606,3714,659,143 4,654,675

4,647,016

4,665,488

4,638,534

4,854,470

4,931,996

Number of Identified ELs

School year

Page 5: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

TOP FIVE LANGUAGES SPOKEN BY ELs NATIONALLY: 2013-14

Oct 2015

Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, 2013-14: http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html.

Language Number of ELsSpanish 3,770,816Arabic 100,461Chinese 99,943Vietnamese 80,283Haitian/Haitian Creole 35,467

Page 6: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 4 READING SCORES FOR

ELs and NON-ELs: 1998 TO 2015

0316

1998 2000 2002 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015140

160

180

200

220

240

217 214219 219 220 223 223 224 225 225

174167

183 186 187 188 188 188 187 189

Non-ELs ELs

Scal

e sc

ore

6

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2015 Reading Assessments.

Page 7: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 8 READING SCORES FOR

ELs and NON-ELs: 1998 TO 2015

1998 2002 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280262 265 263 262 263 265 266 268 267

217224 222 224 222 219 223 225 223

Non-ELs ELs

Scal

e sc

ore

7

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1998, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015 Reading Assessments.

1215

Page 8: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS SCORES FOR ELs and

NON-ELs: 2000 TO 2015

2000 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

226236 239 242 242 243 244 243

199

214 216 217 218 219 219 218

Non-ELs ELs

Scal

e sc

ore

8

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015 Mathematics Assessments.

1215

Page 9: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS SCORES FOR ELs and

NON-ELs: 2000 TO 2015

2000 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

273 278 280 282 284 285 286 284

234241 244 245 243 244 245 246

Non-ELs ELs

Scal

e sc

ore

9

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015 Mathematics Assessments.

1215

Page 10: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES BY RACIAL/ETHNIC CATEGORY: SY

2013-14

10

SY 2013-140.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

82.3%

69.6%

89.4%

72.5%76.3%

87.2%

All students American Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White

Perc

enta

ge

Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, SYs 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html

Page 11: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES BY STUDENT

GROUP: SY 2013-14

11

SY 2013-140.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

82.3%74.6%

63.1% 62.6%

All students Economically disadvantaged students Students with disabilities

ELs

Perc

enta

ge

Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, SYs 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html

0116

Page 12: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

TRENDS IN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES BY STUDENT

GROUP

12

SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13 SY 2013-1450.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

79.0% 80.0% 81.0% 82.3%

70.0%72.0% 73.0%

74.6%

59.0%61.0% 62.0% 63.1%

57.0%59.0%

61.1%62.6%

All Students Economically DisadvantagedStudents with Disabilities ELs

Perc

enta

ge

Source: EDFacts/Consolidated State Performance Report, SYs 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html

0116

Page 13: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

EQUITY AND OPPORTUNITIES

Page 14: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

SIGNIFICANCE OF LAU V. NICHOLS

14

“[T]here is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education.” – Douglas, J.

Page 15: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES: • Identifying and Assessing

• Providing Language Assistance• Staffing and Supporting • Providing Meaningful Access • Avoiding Unnecessary Segregation • Evaluating EL students for Special Services• Meeting the needs of Students Who Opt Out of EL

Services• Monitoring and Exiting EL Students from EL

Services• Evaluating Effectiveness• Meaningful Communication with Parents and

GuardiansGuidance is available at: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ellresources.html under “Dear Colleague Letter, English Learner Students and Limited English Proficient Parents” (1/7/15).

0115

Page 16: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

2012 NPD GRANTEES

• 73 funded grantees• Most common focus “training all

teachers”• STEM was another focus area • 19 featured rural schools and

distance/online programs

Page 17: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

2016 NPD GRANTEES

• 49 grantees from 26 states• 48 grantees - moderate level of

evidence• 18 grantees - early learning programs.• 17 grantees - dual language programs.• Parental and community involvement• Digital learning, rural schools, and

special education.

Page 18: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

RENEWED COMMITMENT

“These grants are a smart investment in biliteracy, early learning, family and community engagement, and expanding professional development for educators working to meet the needs of English learner students. With this funding, we continue to deliver on our promise of equity, excellence and opportunity in supporting educators, students and families across the country.”

– John B. King, Jr., US Secretary of Education

2016 NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (NPD) PROGRAM

Page 19: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

MOVING FORWARD

ESSA AND ELS

Page 20: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

ESSA and English Learners “English learners” replaces “LEP” Reauthorizes Title III: Language Instruction

for English Learners and Immigrant Students– Increases the authorization levels beginning in

FY 2017 ($63mil) – Requires that states establish and implement

standardized statewide entry and exit procedures for ELs

Requires State-determined accountability systems under Title I to include goals and interim targets for English language proficiency (ELP) for ELs

Page 21: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)…”it creates the opportunity to reclaim the goal of a well-rounded education for all students: an education that not only includes strong numeracy and literacy but access to science, social studies, the arts, physical education and health, and the opportunity to learn a second or third language”.

“The challenge for us, is will we act, will we take the actions necessary to become who we ought to be. Let us act with urgency on behalf of the civil rights of our children, let us ensure that school is a pathway to opportunity”. John B. King Jr. U.S. Secretary of Education

21

Page 22: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

1

STATES OFFERING SEAL OF BILITERACY

Source: http://sealofbiliteracy.org/ as of 9/22/16.

Page 23: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

TOTAL NUMBER OF STATES THAT APPROVED THE SEAL OF BILITERACY, BY YEAR

3Source: http://sealofbiliteracy.org/ as of 06/30/16.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20160

5

10

15

20

25

1 1

4

9

16

23

6/30/16

Page 24: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

STATES OFFERING SEALS OF BILITERACY

1

*Seal of Biliteracy approved by School District but not fully approved by the state. Source: http://sealofbiliteracy.org/ as of 06/30/16.

Approved State Seals• Arizona• California• District of Columbia• Florida• Georgia• Hawaii• Illinois• Indiana• Kansas

• Louisiana• Maryland• Minnesota• Nevada• New Jersey• New Mexico• New York• North Carolina

• Oregon• Rhode Island• Texas• Utah• Virginia• Washington• Wisconsin

Approved School District Seal*

Under Consideration

Early Stages

• Anchorage School District (AK)

• Colorado• Iowa• Massachusetts• Ohio

• Alabama• Alaska• Arkansas• Connecticut• Delaware• Michigan• New Hampshire• Tennessee

6/30/16

Page 25: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016
Page 26: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016
Page 27: Prioritizing English Learners: The Right Partnerships, Strategies and Resources by Libia Gil Part 2 - Community Convention 2016

Questions? [email protected]