68
Playing by the Rules: Six3es Abstrac3on Minimalist Sculpture

Playing by the Rules: 1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Summary of the Minimalist movement in painting and sculpture. Artists include Frank Stell, Carl Andre, Robert Morris, Judy Chicago, and more.

Citation preview

Page 1: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Playing  by  the  Rules:  Six3es  Abstrac3on  

Minimalist  Sculpture  

Page 2: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  •  Minimal  art  describes  abstract  geometric  pain3ng  and  sculpture  executed  in  the  United  States  in  the  1960s.  

•  It  is  also  referred  to  as  “Literalist  art”  or  “ABC  art”.  •  The  predominant  organizing  principles  behind  it  include  the  right  triangle,  the  square,  and  the  cube  rendered  with  a  minimum  of  incident  or  composi3onal  maneuvering.      

•  Minimalism’s  dominant  period  ranged  from  1963-­‐1968.  

•  Minimal  art  was  dormant  in  the  1970s,  rejected  by  the  end  of  the  decade  as  hardline  and  authoritarian  by  the  younger  genera3on.  

•  Primary  Minimalist  ar3sts  include:  Carl  Andre,  Dan  Flavin,  Donald  Judd,  Sol  LeWiY,  and  Robert  Morris    

Page 3: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Characteris3cs  of  Minimalism  include:  

–  Repe33on  of  form.  – Uniformity.  – Absence  of  metaphor.  – Neutral  surfaces.  –  Employment  of  industrial  materials.  

Trends  of  Minimalist    include:  –  Monochroma3c  coloring.  –  Interest  in  how  exhibi3on  space  was  part  of  the  work  

itself.  –  The  vanishing  base  (sculptors  put  works  right  on  floor).  –  Blurring  boundary  between  pain3ng  and  sculpture  

(pain3ngs  o`en  look  like  sculptures  hanging  on  wall).  

Page 4: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

•  Minimalist  art  is,  in  contrast  to  its  predecessors,  not  about  self-­‐expression.  

•  Minimalist  concerns  were  more  aesthe3c  than  social,  although  their  art  style  was  considered  “hip”  and  “cool”.      

•  Minimalist  art  is  objec3ve.  •  Minimalist  ar3sts  rejected  the  tradi3onal  concepts  of  “truth  to  material”  and  instead  favored  industrial,  non-­‐art  materials  and  the  manufacturing  process.  

•  It  is  a  modernist  concept  to  maintain  some  truth  to  materials,  so  Minimalism’s  rejec3on  of  that  concept  secured  its  nomina3on  as  a  point  where  postmodernism  began.  

Page 5: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

•  Clement  Greenberg’s  influence  over  the  art  world  reaches  its  zenith.  

•  Minimalism,  although  ar3sts  associated  with  the  movement  rejected  the  name,  is  by  no  organized  effort,  a  rejec3on  Greenbergian  aesthe3cs.    It  is  a  literal  applica3on  of  it.    Minimalists  would  however  challenge  Greenbergian  formalism  and  the  power  of  the  art  cri3c.  

•  His  legacy  is  carried  on  in  the  wri3ngs  of  followers  Michael  Fried  (b.  1939)  and  Rosalind  Krauss  (b.1941).    –  Each  play  a  significant  part  of  carrying  on  Greenbergian  formalism  to  

this  day.  •  The  bulk  of  cri3cal  literature  on  Minimalism  was  wriYen  between  

1963  and  1968.    –   The  dominant  authori3es  are  Barbara  Rose,  Lucy  Lippard,  and  Michael  

Fried.        

Page 6: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Frank  Stella  (b.  1936)  •  Frank  Stella’s  Black  Painitngs,  shown  as  early  as  1959  in  the  MoMA’s  “Sixteen  Americans”  exhibi3on  is  considered  the    inaugural  moment  of    Minimalism.  –  The  design  of  his  pain3ngs  was  o`en  determined  by  materials  available.  

–  The  work  of  Robert  Morris  (process-­‐oriented  art)  and  Michael  Heizer  (earthworks  of  the  late  1960s)  are  said  to  signal  its  demise.  

 

Frank  Stella,  Die  Fahne  Hochl,  1959.    Enamel  on  canvas,  121  ½”  x  73”.    Whitney  Museum  of  

American  Art.  

Page 7: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Frank  Stella  (b.  1936)  •  Works  like  Frank  Stella’s  Empress  of  India  are  specifically  important  to  Minimalism.      

•  His  pain3ngs  o`en  recall  Renaissance  shapes  and  blur  the  boundary  between  sculpture  and  pain3ng.    

Frank  Stella,  Empress  of  India,  1965.  Metallic  powder  in  polymer  emulsion  paint  on  canvas,  6'  

5"  x  18'  8"  .    Museum  of  Modern  Art.  

Page 8: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  •  Stella’s  work  is  much  like  the  work  of  Kelly  and  others.    His  work  

teeters  between  Minimalism  and  Post-­‐Painterly  Abstrac3on.  •  Stella,  like  Kelly,  explores  the  shape  of  the  canvas  and  like  

Johns,  allows  the  whole  canvas  to  figure  into  the  work.  

Frank  Stella,  Empress  of  India,  1965.  Metallic  powder  in  polymer  emulsion  paint  on  canvas,  6'  5"  x  18'  8"  .    

Museum  of  Modern  Art.  

Ellsworth  Kelly,  Mandorla,  1988.    Bronze,  8’5”  x  4’  5  ½”. Private

collection.  

Page 9: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism    "What  is  important  to  me  is  not  geometrical  shape  per  se,  or  color  per  se,  but  to  make  a  rela3onship  between  shape  and  color  which  feels  to  me  like  my  experience.  To  make  what  feels  to  me  like  reality."    

 -­‐April,  1965  

Anne  TruiY,  First,  1961.    Acrylic  paint  on  wood,  44  ¼"  x  17  ¾"  x  7”.    Bal3more  

Museum  of  Art.  

Page 10: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Anne  TruiY  (1921-­‐2004)  •  The  first  exhibi3on  of  Minimalist  art  

was  a  solo  show  3tled  “Sculpture”  featuring  the  work  of    Anne  TruiY.  –  It  was  held  in  1963  at  Andre  Emmerich    

Gallery.  –  The  show  was  reviewed  by  ar3st  

Donald  Judd  and  cri3c  Michael  Fried.  •  TruiY  selected  her  materials  for  formal  

and  prac3cal  purposes.    –  She  selected  wood  because  it  would  

take  the  color.  –  TruiY  operates  by  using  the  materials  

to  materialize  the  color  while  the  color  dematerializes  into  the  form.  

Anne  TruiY,  A  Wall  for  Apricots,  1968.    Acrylic  paint  on  wood,  72  5/8”  x  14”  x  14”.    Bal3more  

Museum  of  Art.  

Page 11: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Exhibi3on  History  •  A  number  of  would  be  Minimalists  exhibited  together  for  the  

first  3me  in  the  “Black,  White,  and  Gray”  show  in  1964,  at  the  Wadsworth  Atheneum  in  Haroord,  CT.    

•  The  first  true  group  show  however  was  at  the  Kaymar  Gallery  in  the  early  1960s  in  NY.    It  was    organized  by  Dan  Flavin.    

•  Henry  Geldzahler  included  Morris,  Judd,  Murray,  Andre,  Hunman,  Insley,  Williams,  Bell,  Bannard,  and  Zox  in  the  “Shape  and  Structure”  show  at  the  Tibor  de  Nagy  Gallery  in  1965.  

•  The  most  sensa3onal  NY  show  of  Minimalist  art  was  the  “Primary  Structures”  show  organized  by  Kynaston  McShine  at  the  Jewish  Museum  in  1966.    

•  Lawrence  Alloway,  later  in  1966,  organized  a  sister  show  to  McShine’s  called  “Systemic  Pain3ng”.    It  covered  geometric,  hard-­‐edge,  and  Minimal  pain3ng.      –  Ar3sts  including  Noland,  Stella,  and  Novros  were  shown.      

Page 12: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Minimalist  influences:  •  The  roots  of  Minimalism  lie  in  European  abstrac3on.  

•  The  Bauhaus,  de  S3jl,  and  Russian  Construc3vism  are  par3cular  influences,  especially  the  works  of  Kazimir  Malevich  and  Piet  Mondrian.    

Kazimir  Malevich,  Black  Square,  1913.  Oil  on  canvas,  31.2”  x  31.3,”  State  Russian  Museum,  

St.  Petersburg  

Piet  Mondrian,  Composi@on  in  Red,  Blue,  and  Yellow,  1930.    Oil  on  canvas,  20  1/8"  x  20  1/8".  

Museum  of  Modern  Art.  

Page 13: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

•  Minimalist  ar3sts  are  also  influenced  by  ar3sts  including  Pablo  Picasso,  Constan3n  Brancusi,  Marcel  Duchamp,  and  ar3sts  associated  with  Abstract  Expressionism  including  BarneY  Newman  and  Josef  Albers.  

•  Minimalism  is  a  reac3on  against  the  painterly  subjec3vity  of  the  New  York  School  of  Abstrac3on.  –  This  is  a  con3nua3on  of  Post-­‐Painterly  Abstrac3on’s  rejec3on  of  the  gestural  work  of  de  Kooning,  of  ar3st  ego,  and  presence  of  the  ar3st.  

Page 14: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Tony  Smith  (1912-­‐1980)  •  CigareEe  exhibits  Minimalist  need  for  viewer  interac3on.  

Tony  Smith,  CigareEe,  1961-­‐66.    Plywood  model  to  be  made  in  steel,  15’  x  26’  x  18.’    As  seen  outside  the  Albright-­‐Knox  Art  Gallery,  Buffalo  NY  .  

Page 15: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

•  Smith’s  work  recalls  the  Baroque  emphasis  on  viewer  interac3on  with  the  piece.  

•  CigareEe  must  be  viewed  from  mul3ple  angles  to  fully  see  and  appreciate  it.  

•  Smith  demands  the  viewer  rely  on  memory  and  movement  to  understand  the  piece.  

Tony  Smith,  CigareEe,  1961-­‐66.    Plywood  model  to  be  made  in  steel,  15’  x  26’  x  18.’    As  seen  outside  the  Albright-­‐Knox  Art  

Gallery,  Buffalo  NY  .  

Gianlorenzo  Bernini,  1623-­‐1624.    Marble,  67”.  Galleria  Borghese,  Rome.  

Page 16: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Tony  Smith  (1912-­‐1980)  •  Like  Pop,  Smith’s  Die  takes  the  everyday  item  and  elevates  its  status  to  art.  

•  Its  placement  on  the  ground  demonstrates  Minimalist  dismissal  of  the  base.    

Tony  Smith,  Die,  1962.    Steel,  edi3on  of  three,  6’  x  6’  x  6’.    Private  Collec3on.      

Page 17: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

•  Smith’s  Die  recalls  Piero  Manzoni’s  own  Pedestal  for  the  World,  1961  and  an3cipates  earthworks.  

Piero  Manzoni,  Socle  du  Monde  (Pedestal  for  the  World,)  1962.    Iron  and  bronze  

32.3”  x  39.4”  x  39.4”,      Herning,    Denmark.  

Tony  Smith,  Die,  1962.    Steel,  edi3on  of  three,  6’  x  6’  x  6’.    Private  

Collec3on.      

Page 18: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

•  The  first  ar3st  to  address  the  base  and  produce  baseless  art  was  Yves  Klein  in  1957.  –  Klein’s  “aerosta3c  sculptures”  consisted  of  his  releasing  1001  blue  balloons  into  the  air.  

•  By  the  mid-­‐1960s,  this  was  common  prac3ce.  –  Argument  against  the  base  was  grounded  in  formal  and  theore3cal  no3ons  regarding  the  ontological  status  of  the  work  of  art.  

 

Recrea3on  of  Yves  Klein’s  Aesrosta@c  Sculptures,  1957.    Photographs  January    21,  2007.  Georges  Jean  

Raymond  Pompidou,  Paris.  

Page 19: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Anthony  Caro  (b.  1924)  •  Caro’s  sculptures  are  some  of  the  

earliest  examples  of  sculptures  that  are  completely  self-­‐suppor3ve.  –  His  Midday  demonstrates  sculpture  

in  process  of  elimina3ng  the  base  en3rely.  

–  His  works,  like  Twenty  Four  Hours,  use  the  ground  as  an  ac3ve  part  of  the  sculpture.  

•  Caro’s  pieces  emphasize  their  existence  as  physical  objects  in  a  physical  space.  

•  Ar3sts  and  cri3cs  argued  the  base  placed  the  sculpture  on  a  level  not  shared  by  the  viewer.    –  The  base  idealized  sculpture  and  

emphasized  the  unreal  status  of  its  support.  

Anthony  Caro,  Midday,  1960.  Painted  steel,  7'  7  ¾”  x  37  ⅜"  x  12'  1  ¾” Museum  of  Modern  

Art,  NY.  

Anthony  Caro,  Twenty  Four  Hours,  1960.    Painted  steel,  4.5’  x    7.3’  x  2.7’.  Tate  

Modern.  

Page 20: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  Bell  was  a  leader  of  the  “Light  

and  Space”  Movement.  –  Ar3sts  combine  interest  in  

technology  and  art  with  light  and  space.  

•  The  radical  disappearance  of  the  base  was  also  seen  in  Larry  Bell’s  work,  Un@tled  (1967).  

•  Bell’s  exhibi3on  without  bases  addresses  the  aesthe3c  of  the  3me  which  believed  the  base  was  ineffectual    and  meaninglessness.  

Larry  Bell,  97,  1997.  Beveled  glass,  6’x6’x4’.  Installa3on  view    wood  Street  Gallery,  

PiYsburgh,  PA.  

Page 21: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Robert  Irwin  (b.1928)  •  Irwin’s  Un@tled,  is  a  drama3c  example  of  the  work,  its  environment,  and  their  rela3onship.  

Robert  Irwin,  Un@tled,  1965-­‐67.    Acrylic  automobile  lacquers  on  prepared,  

shaped  aluminum  with  metal  tubes,  four  150  waY  floodlights,  60”  diameter.    Walker  Art  Center,  Minneapolis.  

Page 22: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Donald  Judd  (1928-­‐1994)  •  Judd  was  both  an  ar3st  and  art  cri3c.  

•  His  essay,  “Specific  Objects”  (1965)  helped  to  establish  Minimalist  art.  

•  He  also  claims  to  have  thought  of  eradica3ng  the  base  prior  to  other  ar3sts  wit  his  work  from  1962.  

•  His  sculptures  exhibit  Minimalist    characteris3cs  in  their  serialism  (something  inherited  from  Pop  art),  monochroma3c  color  scheme,  lack  of  a  base,  use  of  industrial  objects,  and  objec3vity.  

Donald  Judd,  Un@tled  (Stack),    1967.  Lacquer  on  galvanized  iron,  Twelve  units,  each  9”  x  40”  x  31“,    Museum  of  Modern  Art,  NY.  

Page 23: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Donald  Judd  (1928-­‐1994)  •  His  Un@tled,  1977  demonstrates  Judd’s  removal  of  the  base  and  op3ng  to  hang  his  sculptures  on  the  wall-­‐a  move  that  also  blurs  the  boundaries  between  pain3ng  and  sculpture.  

•  His  work  u3lizes  uniformity  of  form-­‐the  pieces  create  the  whole  work  and  that  uniformity  is  repeated  without  metaphor.   Donald  Judd,  Un@tled  (77/23  -­‐  Bernstein),  

1977.    Stainless  steel  and  blue  Plexiglas.    Private  Collec3on.    

Page 24: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

“A  work  can  be  as  powerful  as  it  can  be  thought  to  be.    Actual  space  is  intrinsically  more  powerful  and  specific  than  paint  on  a  flat  surface…”  

                                 -­‐Donald  Judd  

Donald  Judd,  Un@tled,  1977.    Concrete,  outer  ring  diameter  49’3,” Münster,  Germany.  

Page 25: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Robert  Morris  (b.1931)  •  Morris’  work  from  the  early  1960s  

is  another  example  of  ar3sts  abandoning  the  base  to  display  their  sculpture.  

•  Some  scholars  argue  these  works  to  be  the  earliest  example  of  a  Minimalist  ar3st  NOT  using  the  base.  

Robert  Morris,  Two  Columns,  1961.    Painted  plywood,  96”  x  24”  x  24”.  

Private  Collec3on.    

Page 26: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Robert  Morris  (b.1931)  •  Morris  was  a  student  of  Tony  Smith.  •  Morris  took  the  gestalt  principle  as  

the  driving  force  behind  his  sculptures.  –  This  theory  focuses  on  human  

percep3on  and  the  ability  to  understand  visual  rela3onships  of  space  and  unity.  

•  His  approach  toward  crea3ng  works  as  part  of  a  total  exhibi3on  concept  was  based  on  the  scale  of  the  human  body  and  its  experience  with  the  work  and  the  space  in  which  it  was  shown.  –  This  approach  evolved  into  site-­‐

specific  art  and  has  its  roots  in  the  work  of  earlier  modern  ar3sts  SchwiYers  and  Klein,  and  Baroque  ar3sts  like  Bernini.  

Robert  Morris,  Exhibi3on,  Green  Gallery,  New  York,  1964.    Le`  to  right:  Un@tled  (Cloud),  1964,  painted  plywood.    Un@tled  (Boiler),  

1964,  painted  plywood;  Un@tled  (Floor  Beam),  1964,  painted  plywood;  Un@tled  (Titled),  1964,  

painted  plywood.  

Page 27: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

•  Morris’  work  references  earlier  ar3sts  including  SchwiYers  and  Klein.  

Yves  Klein,  La  spécialisa@on  de  la  sensibilité  à  l’état  ma@ère  première  en  sensibilité  picturale  stabilisée,  Le  Vide  (The  Specializa@on  of  Sensibility  in  the  Raw  Material  State  into  Stabilized  Pictorial  Sensibility,  The  Void)  or  Le  Vide  (The  Void)  displayed  at  the  Iris  Clert  

Gallery,  Paris,  France,  1958.  

Kurt  SchwiYers,  Hanover  Merzbau,  destroyed.    This  photograph  taken  c.  

1931.  

Page 28: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

“The  idea  becomes  a  machine  that  makes  art.”  

               -­‐Sol  LeWiY  

 

Sol  LeWiY,  Sculpture  Series  “A,” 1967.    Installa3on  view,  Dwan  Gallery,  Los  Angeles.  

Page 29: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Sol  LeWiY  (1928-­‐2007)  •  Although  he  would  

become  a  leader  of  Conceptualist  art,  LeWiY’s  earlier  work  embraced  the  Minimalist  aesthe3c.  

•  Like  Morris,  he  conceived  of  his  works  as  they  would  be  installed.  

•  His  Sculpture  Series  “A”  embraces  seriality,  uniformity,  balance  and  harmony,  a  manufactured  process,  and  industrial  materials.  

Sol  LeWiY,  Sculpture  Series  “A,” 1967.    Installa3on  view,  Dwan  Gallery,  Los  Angeles.  

Page 30: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Sol  LeWiY  (1928-­‐2007)  •  LeWiY’s  works  were  usually  

not  constructed  by  the  ar3st;  he  would  sell  or  distribute  instruc3ons  to  the  museum  or  gallery  for  installa3on.  –  This  erases  the  ar3st’s  hand  

and  ego  from  the  finished  piece.  

•  This  concern  with  process,  shared  by  LeWiY  and  Morris  would  become  the  basis  for  Process  Art  and  the  ul3mate  challenge  to  Minimalist  aesthe3c.    

   

Sol  LeWiY,  Wall  Drawing  No.  652,  On  Three  Walls,  Con@nuous  Forms  with  Color  in  

Washes  Superimposed,  1990.    Color  ink  wash  on  wall,  approximately  30’  x  60’    As  pictured  in  temporary  installa3on  at  Addison  Gallery,  Andover,  MA  c.  1993.    Currently  installed  in  

Indianapolis  Museum  of  Art  .  

Page 31: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Sol  LeWiY  (1928-­‐2007)  •  LeWiY’s  artwork  and  his  wri3ngs  lead  

Minimalism’s  challenge  of  the  Modernist  aesthe3c.  – Minimalists  rejected  Greenberg’s  ideals.  

•  LeWiY’s  influen3al  essay,  “Paragraphs  on  Conceptual  Art”  paved  the  way  for  Conceptualism  by  arguing  it  was  the  idea  that  was  most  important.    –  Conceptualism  takes  influence  from  

Dada.  Sample  of  instruc3ons  for  drawing  

by  Sol  LeWiY.  

Page 32: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Carl  Andre  (b.  1935)  •  Andre  drew  influence  from  Stella  and  Brancusi.  

•  Rejects  Renaissance  subtrac3ve  process  for  construc3on  of  art  objects.  

•  His  pieces  use  industrial  materials  in  mul3ple  to  create  cohesive  whole.    

 Carl  Andre,  Pyramid,  1959  (destroyed),  1970  9recreated).  Fir  wood,  68  7/8”  x  

31” x  31”. Dallas  Museum  of  Art.  

Page 33: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Carl  Andre  (b.  1935)  •  Andre’s  sculptures  do  not  use  a  

base;  they  are  directly  in  the  space  of  the  viewer  and  demand  to  be  nego3ated  when  walking  through  the  gallery.    

•  Andre  applied  a  very  strict  work  ethic  while  construc3ng  his  pieces.  –  He  took  this  from  working  on  a  train.  

–  He  would  wear  a  jumper-­‐like  uniform  to  the  gallery/museum  and  piece  together  his  sculptures.  

 Carl  Andre,  Well,  1964/70.  Wood,  84”  x  48”  x  48”.  Museum  Ludwig,  Köln.  

Page 34: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Carl  Andre  (b.  1935)  •  Since  1960s,  his  works  have  

been  site  specific.  –  From  my  personal  experience,  I  actually  walked  over  one  while  in  high  school.    I  was  too  busy  looking  on  the  wall  and  stepped  on  a  work  not  unlike  his  37  Pieces  of  Work.  

•  This  is  the  interac3on  the  ar3st  wants  for  his  piece,  but  not  all  museums  allow.  

•  37  Pieces  of  Work  was  assembled  by  first  placing  smaller  squares  into  a  square  like  form  to  create  the  larger  squares.      

Carl  Andre,  37  Pieces  of  Work,  Fall  1969.    Aluminum,  copper,  steel  lead,  

magnesium,  and  zinc,  1,296  units  (216  of  each  metal),  each  unit  12”  x  12”  x  ¾,”  overall  36’  x  36.’    Installa3on  view  from  rotunda  of  the  Guggenheim  Museum,  

NYC  

Page 35: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Richard  Serra  (b.1939)  •  Serra  realized  his  mature  work  when  he  

began  working  with  steel  plates  and  sheets  of  lead.  

•  He  would  create  various  construc3ons,  like  One  Ton  Prop  by  carefully  balancing  the  sheets  together.  

•  He  allows  the  medium  to  dictate  the  nature  of  the  design.  –  One  Ton  Prop  consists  of  4  500  lb.  sheets  of  

lead  against  one  another.  

•  Serra’s  work  presents  an  inconsistency  as  the  3tle  suggests  it  can  be  blown  over  like  a  house  of  cards  but  the  nature  of  the  material  speaks  otherwise.  

Richard  Serra,  One  Ton  Prop  (House  of  Cards),  1969  

(refabricated  1986).    Lead  an3mony,  four  plates,  48”  x  48”  x  1”  Museum  of  Modern  Art,  NY.  

Page 36: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Richard  Serra  (b.  1939)  •  Serra  is  best  known  for  his  

controversial  work,  Titled  Arc.  

•  This  piece  was  inserted  in  front  of  the  Federal  Plaza  in  NYC  as  part  of  the  Percent  for  Arts  program.  

•  Serra  uses  his  characteris3c  material,  steel,  and  exploits  its  maneuverability-­‐you  can  see  the  arc  3lts  a  slight  bit  in  the  photograph.  

•  The  piece  caused  great  controversy  in  1981  and,  a`er  a  vola3le  court  baYle,  was  removed  in  the  middle  of  the  night  and  taken  to  a  scrapyard  in  NJ.   Richard  Serra,  Tilted  Arc,  1981.    Hot-­‐rolled  steel,  

height,  12’,  length  120.’  Original  sight  Federal  Plaza,  Foley  Square,  NY.    Removed  in  1989.    

Page 37: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Playing  by  the  Rules:  Six3es  Abstrac3on  

Minimalist  Pain3ng  

Page 38: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

•  Although  Minimalist  sculpture  is  o`en  concentrated  on  when  discussing  the  style,  painters  were  crea3ng  under  the  Minimalist  aesthe3c.  

•  Painters  had,  long  before  sculptors,  realized  the  superfluous  nature  of  the  frame-­‐Picasso,  in  1912,  replaces  it  with  rope  in  S@ll  Life  with  Chair  Caning  addressing  the  nature  of  the  frame  in  its  rela3on  to  the  work.  

Page 39: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Agnes  Mar3n  (1912-­‐2004)  •  Mar3n’s  1960s  Minimalist  pain3ngs  

represent  her  mature  style.  •  Sought  purity  of  the  canvas  and  to  

present  viewer  with  the  medita3ve.  •  Stylis3cally,  she  aligns  with  Rothko,  

Newman,  and  Hard-­‐Edge  painters-­‐but  does  not  use  their  process.  

Agnes  Mar3n,  Night  Sea,  1963.    Oil  and  gold  leaf  on  canvas,  6’  x  6.    Private  

Collec3on.’  

Page 40: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Mark  Rothko,  White  and  Greens  in  Blue,  1957.  Oil  on  canvas,  8'  4"  x  6'  10  ”.    Private  Collec3on.  

BarneY  Newman,  Onement,  I,  1948.    Oil  on  canvas  and  oil  on  masking  tape  on  canvas,  27  ¼”  x  16  ¼”.    Museum  of  

Modern  Art,  NY.  

 

Page 41: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

When  I  cover  the  square  with  rectangles,  it  lightens  the  weight  of  the  square,  destroys  its  power.  

   -­‐Agnes  Mar3n  •  Un@tled,  No.5,  1975  signals  

Mar3n’s  return  to  pain3ng  a`er  a  short  hiatus.  –  Her  pain3ngs  retain  her  personal  

style  of  geometric  abstrac3on,  simplicity  of  form,  and  subtle  luminous  color.  

Agnes  Mar3n,  Un@tled  No.  5,  1975.    Synthe3c  polymer  paint  and  pencil  on  synthe3c  polymer  gesso  on  

canvas,  71  ⅞”  x  72  ¼”  Museum  of  Modern  Art,  NY.  

Page 42: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Robert  Ryman  (b.1930)  •  Ryman’s  oeuvre  is  a  study  of,  “how  

paint  worked”  as  he  said.  •  His  pain3ngs  are  more  about  an  

inves3ga3on  into  process  and  an3cipate  Post-­‐Minimalism’s  Process  Art.  –  He  studied  how  paint  was  applied  and  

how  it  interacted  with  the  surface  of  the  canvas  and  various  other  types  of  mateirals.  

•  Mid-­‐1960s  limits  self  to  the  color  white.  –  These  pieces  recall  the  all  white  pain3ngs  

of  Rauschenberg  and  Malevich.  

Robert  Ryman,  Points,  1963.  Oil  on  aluminum,    36”  x  36”.    Collec3on  of  

the  ar3st.  

Page 43: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Robert  Rauschenberg,  White  Pain@ngs  (Four  Panels),  1951.    House  paint  on  canvas,  72”  x  72”.    Ar3st’s  estate.  

Robert  Ryman,  Classico  III,  1968.    Polymer  on  paper,  7’9”  x  7’  5”.    Stedelijk  Museum.  

Kazimir  Malevich,  Black  Square,  1913.  Oil  on  canvas,  31.2”  x  31.3,”  

State  Russian  Museum,  St.  Petersburg.  

Page 44: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Robert  Mangold  (b.  1937)  •  Mangold’s  austere  pain3ngs  are  a  

reac3on  to  the  excess  of  Abstract  Expressionism.  

•  Mentored  by  Al  Held,  Mangold  he  learned  to  bring  aYen3on  to  the  objectness  of  the  pain3ng.  

•  His  works  use  the  background  to  offset  the  purposeful  “error”  of  design.  –  This  inserts  a  humanness  into  the  piece  and  a  sense  of  changeableness.  

–  His  works  find  the  ability  to  rest  between  the  bravura  of  Abstract  Expressionism  and  the  coolness  of  Minimalism.    

–  It  also  exhibits  the  increasing  challenge  Minimalism  faced  during  the  1970s.  

Robert  Mangold,  Un@tled  from  Seven  Aqua@nts.  1973  (published  1974).  One  from  a  porcolio  of  

seven  aqua@nts,  plate:  15  ⅞  x  15  ¾” .    John  Weber  Gallery,  NY.  

Page 45: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Dorethea  Rockburne  (b.  1921)  •  Rockburne’s  personal  style  takes  

Minimalism  into  the  realm  of  Italian  Arte  Povera  through  her  use  of  modest  materials.  

•  She  creates  her  pieces  directly  on  the  wall  or  aYaches  drawing  paper  which  she  o`en  pierces  to  reveal  the  wall  beneath.  –  Sol  LeWiY  also  does  this  with  his  designs.  

•  She,  like  many  Minimalists,  never  abandons  the  concept  of  making  parts  to  complete  the  whole.   Dorethea  Rockburne,  Indica@on  Drawing  Series:  

Neighborhood  from  Drawing  Which  Makes  Itself,  1973.    Wall  drawing  pencil  and  colored  pencil  with  vellum,  various  dimensions,  Museum  of  Modern  

Art,  NY.  

Page 46: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  Jo  Baer  (b.  1929)  •  Baer  takes  explora3on  of  the  

canvas  to  new  dimensions.  •  She  relieved  the  work  of  the  

ar3st’s  hand  by  not  including  any  brushwork  on  the  canvas-­‐this  she  believed  helped  the  audience  to  focus  on  the  en3re  piece.  –  She  applied  Gestalt  psychology  to  

her  work  in  ways  similar  to  Morris.  •  She  includes  stripes  in  her  

Wrapped  Around  pieces.  –  The  bands  are  painted  and  then  

applied  to  the  canvas.  –  The  viewer  must  look  closely  at  

the  edges  to  realize  the  whole.  –  She  plays  with  the  borders  

because  according  to  Gestalt  psychology  this  is  what  helps  the  human  mind  to  process  the  shape.  

Jo  Baer,  Un@tled  (Wrapped  Around  Triptych-­‐Blue,  Green,  Lavender),  1969-­‐74.    

Oil  on  canvas,  each  panel  48”  x  52”. Collection of the artist.  

Page 47: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Playing  by  the  Rules:  Six3es  Abstrac3on  

West  Coast  Minimalism  

Page 48: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

The  Ferus  Studs  and  The  C.A.  Cool  School  

The  Ferus  Gang  (Group  Portrait  of  Ar@sts  from  the  Ferus  Gallery),  1962.  (Le`  to  Right:  John  Altoon,  Craig  Kauffman,  Allen  Lynch,  Ed  Kienholz,  Ed  Moses,  Robert  Irwin,  Billy  Al  

Bengston).  Photo  by  Patricia  Faure.    

The  Ferus  Gang  (Group  Portrait  of  Ar@sts  from  the  Ferus  Gallery),  1962.  Clockwise  From  The  Upper  Le`:  Billy  Al  Bengston,  Allen  Lynch,  Robert  Irwin,  

Craig  Kaufman,  John  Altoon,  Ed  Kienholz,  Ed  Moses(Center).  Photo  by  Patricia  Faure.  

Page 49: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

West  Coast  Minimalism  

•  By  the  mid-­‐1960s  California  ar3sts  had  embraced  Minimalism  and  given  it  a  uniquely  West  Coast  spin.  –  In  Los  Angeles,  both  the  Fe3sh  Finish  Movement  and  the  Light  and  Space  Movement  put  their  own  par3cular  spin  on  East  Coast  Minimalism.  

• West  Coast  ar3sts  benefit  from  the  le`over  industry  of  World  War  II-­‐its  ship  building  yards  and  temporary  housing  as  well  as  its  car  culture  play  an  important  role  in  aesthe3c  and  materials  used  and  explored.  

Page 50: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

West  Coast  Minimalism  

•  West  Coast  Minimalism  is  known  as  Finish  Fe3sh,  the  L.A.  Look  or  the  Slick  Look,  it  is  also  known  as  the  Cool  School.  

•  The  Light  and  Space  Movement,  also  found  on  the  West  Coast  saw  ar3sts  incorpora3ng  the  latest  technologies  of  the  Southern  California  based  engineering  and  aerospace  industries  to  develop  sensuous,  light-­‐filled  objects.    – Ar3sts  associated  with  these  styles  are  said  to  prefer  result  over  process,  clean  over  messy,  detail  over  approxima3on,  professionalism  over  individuality,  and  icon  over  ac3on.    

Page 51: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

West  Coast  Minimalism  

•  These  schools  are  contemporaneous  to  East  Coast  Minimalism.    –  The  L.A.  School  was,  however,    less  theore3cally  based  and  more  upbeat  and  had  a  more  accessible  personality.  

•  Most  ar3sts  of  the  L.A.  Look  created  art  with  a  clean-­‐edged,  me3culous  style  sugges3ve  of  industrial  fabrica3on.  –  They  share  this  is  common  with  Post-­‐Painterly  Abstrac3on  and  East  Coast  Minimalist  ar3sts.  

•  The  glossy  look  was  sugges3ve  of  the  machine  made-­‐  it  references  suryoards  and  automobiles,  CA  was  known  for  its  surfer  popula3on  and  low-­‐rider  subculture.  –  Its  shares  the  mass  produc3on  approach  with  Pop  ar3sts,  especially  Andy  Warhol  and  his  silkscreens.  

Page 52: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

West  Coast  Minimalism  

•  Los  Angeles  ar3sts  became  notable  for  their  use  of  new  materials,    –  This  is  how  the  varia3on  of  names  like  ‘L.A.  glass  and  plas3c’  or  ‘Finish–Fe3sh’  came  to  be  applied.  

–  These  ar3sts  experimented  with  industrial  materials  such  as  spray  paints,  plas3c  and  treated  glass,  and  fiberglass.  

–  Leaders  in  the  use  of  non-­‐tradi3onal  materials  and  the  interest  in  light  were  Robert  Irwin  (b.1928),  Larry  Bell  (b.1939),  Craig  Kauffman  (b  1932)  and  DeWain  Valen3ne  (b  1936),  who  made  wall-­‐hung  works  as  well  as  free-­‐standing  sculptures.  

•  This  work  paved  the  way  for  the  Light  and  Space  Movement  of  the  1970s.  

Page 53: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

West  Coast  Abstrac3on:  Finish  Fe3sh  Judy  Chicago  (b.  1939)  •  Although  she  is  best  known  for  

her  pioneering  efforts  in  Feminist  Art  and  Art  Prac3ce,  Chicago  had  worked  in  the  Finish  Fe3sh  style  of  Minimalism.  

•  She  was  the  only  woman  “man-­‐enough”  as  she  states  in  her  autobiography  to  hang  with  the  Ferus  Group.  

•  Rainbow  Picket,  first  created  in  1965  and  then  re-­‐created  in  2004  is  one  example  of  her  work  with  the  Cool  School.  –  No3ce  how  her  work  shares  

much  in  common  with  the  columns  of  Robert  Morris  and  Carl  Andre.  

Judy  Chicago.  Rainbow  PickeE,  1965–2004.    Plywood,  canvas,  and  latex  paint,  each  column  is  1’  cubed  and  arranged  at  45°  angle  to  wall.    Brooklyn  Museum  of  Art.  

Page 54: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Judy  Chicago  (b.  1939)  •  Like  many  in  the  L.A.  School,  Chicago  experimented  with  media;  here  she  uses  an  airbrush  (new  at  the  3me)  on  a  car  hood.  –  This  is  also  typical  of  the  fascina3on  with  car  culture  typical  of  West  Coast  ar3sts  at  the  3me.  

Judy  Chicago,  Car  Hood,  1964.  Sprayed  acrylic  lacquer  on  Corvair  car  hood,  42  15/16”  x  49  3/16”  x  4  5/16”.  Moderna  

Museet,  Stockholm.    

Page 55: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  

•  The  art  of  the  Light  and  Space  Movement  inves3gates  human  percep3on  and  sensa3on.  

•  It  evolves  out  of  the  L.A.  School  or  L.A.  Look.    •  These  works  are  self-­‐contained  en33es  frequently  made  of  industrial  materials  such  as  plas3c,  resin,  and  glass  -­‐  which  were  designed  to  convey  nothing  of  the  personal  touch  of  the  fabricator.  

Page 56: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  Bell  was  a  leader  of  the  “Light  and  Space”  Movement.  

•  Like  most  ar3sts  associated  with  Minimalism,  Bell  was  concerned  with  the  perceptual  experience  stemming  from  the  viewer’s  interac3on  with  their  work.  

Larry  Bell,  97,  1997.  Beveled  glass,  6’x6’x4’.  Installa3on  view    wood  Street  Gallery,  

PiYsburgh,  PA.  

Page 57: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  Bell’s  art  addresses  the  

rela3onship  between  the  art  object  and  its  environment  through  the  sculptural  and  reflec3ve  proper3es  of  his  work.    

•  His  latest  works  fully  realize  the  capacity  for  human  interac3on.   Robert  Irwin,  Black³,  2008.  Edi3on  of  3,  Tergal  voile,  

light  construc3on,  framing  materials  and  pain3ngs  (urethane  paint  and  lacquer  on  aircra`  honeycomb  aluminium),  dimensions  variable.  Each  pain3ng:  60”  

x  60“  

Page 58: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Larry  Bell,  Un@tled,  1964.  bismuth,  chromium,  gold,  and  rhodium  on  gold-­‐plated  brass,  14  ¼"  x  

14  3/8"    x  14  3/8".      Hirshhorn  Museum  and  Sculpture  Garden,  Washington,  D.C.  

Light  and  Space  Movement  

I  like  to  think  of  my  glass  construc@ons  as  tapestries  of  reflected  and  transmiEed  light  

                 -­‐Larry  Bell  

Page 59: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  A`er  pain3ng  in  the  Abstract  

Expressionist  tradi3on,  Bell  began  incorpora3ng  fragments  and  shards  of  clear  and  mirrored  glass  into  his  composi3ons.    

•  At  the  same  3me,  his  pain3ng  began  to  exhibit  angular  geometric  composi3ons  that  alluded  to  or  represented  three-­‐dimensional  forms.    –  These  works  frequently  depicted  

rec3linear  forms  with  truncated  corners.    

–  These  evolved  into  a  series  of  shadow  boxes  or  “ghost  boxes”,  three-­‐dimensional  cases  whose  surfaces  o`en  featured  shapes  reminiscent  of  those  in  his  preceding  pain3ngs.   Larry  Bell,  Un@tled,  1967.    Glass,  

coa3ngs  and  metal,  14  ¼”  x  14  ¼”  x  14  ¼”.    Tate,  London.  

Page 60: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  His  work  evolved  into  a  

series  of  shadow  boxes  or  “ghost  boxes”,  three-­‐dimensional  cases  whose  surfaces  o`en  featured  shapes  reminiscent  of  those  in  his  preceding  pain3ngs.  •  This  piece  from  2005  is  

reminiscent  of  that  phase  of  produc3on.  

  Larry  Bell,  SSSS  Shadow  Box,  2005.    Wood  and  coated  glass,  21” x  21” x  5”.    Artnet.  

Page 61: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Larry  Bell  (b.1939)  •  The  op3cal  ambigui3es  created  by  the  reflec3ons  of  the  viewer's  image  and  the  ambient  space  became  the  hallmark  of  Bell's  work.    

Larry  Bell  (in  hat),  Standing  Wall  Installa@on  Pasadena  Art  Museum,  1972.  

Photo  Patricia  Faure  

Page 62: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Robert  Irwin  (b.1928)  •  Irwin’s  Un@tled,  is  a  drama3c  example  of  the  work,  its  environment,  and  their  rela3onship.  

Robert  Irwin,  Un@tled,  1965-­‐67.    Acrylic  automobile  lacquers  on  prepared,  

shaped  aluminum  with  metal  tubes,  four  150  waY  floodlights,  60”  diameter.    Walker  Art  Center,  Minneapolis.  

Page 63: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Light  and  Space  Movement  

Robert  Irwin  (b.1928)  •  To  get  the  desired  effect,  Irwin’s  works  are  site  specific.  

Robert  Irwin,  Un@tled,  1965-­‐67.    Acrylic  automobile  lacquers  on  prepared,  shaped  aluminum  with  metal  

tubes,  four  150  waY  floodlights,  60”  diameter.    Walker  Art  Center,  Minneapolis.  

Page 64: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

“A  work  can  be  as  powerful  as  it  can  be  thought  to  be.    Actual  space  is  intrinsically  more  powerful  and  specific  than  paint  on  a  flat  surface…”  

                                 -­‐Donald  Judd  

Donald  Judd,  Un@tled,  1977.    Concrete,  outer  ring  diameter  49’3,” Münster,  Germany.  

Page 65: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  •  By  the  1970s,  Minimalism’s  

popularity  (and  Greenberg’s  influence)  was  beginning  to  wane.  

•  Ar3sts  grew  frustrated  with  the  amount  of  power  of  the  cri3c  (gallery  and  museums)  over  the  art  economy.  

•  In  retalia3on,  ar3sts  began  to  make  work  outside  the  museum  and  gallery  system  forcing  the  audience  to  commit  to  the  work,  to  travel  to  see  it  and  thus  taking  the  artwork  out  of  posi3on  to  be  commodified.  

•  This  resulted  in  a  new  wave  of  works  referred  to  as  Earthworks,  Site-­‐specific,  and  Earth  Art.  

•  Ar3sts  had  started  to  challenge  the  placing  of  art  within  the  closed  environment  or  gallery  space  by  increasing  scale  or  dimension  of  their  pieces.   Donald  Judd,  Un@tled,  1977.    Concrete,  outer  

ring  diameter  49’3,” Münster,  Germany.  

Page 66: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  

Ronald  Bladen  (1918-­‐1988)  •  Bladen’s  work,  in  the  tradi3on  of  

Duchamp,  dominates  the  gallery  space.  

•  His  Big  X,  creates  barriers  within  the  space  it  occupies-­‐an  expression  of  frustra3on  most  ar3sts  were  feeling  at  the  3me.  

Ronald  Bladen,  The  Big  X,  1967.    Painted    wood  and  model  to  be  made  in  metal,  22’8”  x  

24’6”.    Fischbach  Gallery,  NY.  

Page 67: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

Minimalism  •  The  pluralism  of  the  1970s  

would  allow  ar3sts  previously  marginalized-­‐women  and  ar3sts  of  color  (men  and  women)  to  make  commentary  on  the  state  of  the  art  world.  

•  Ar3st  Miriam  “Mimi”  Shapiro  (b.1923),  a  leading  feminist  ar3st  and  scholar,  created  The  Big  Ox,  in  1968.  One  cannot  help  but  see  a  resemblance.  

–  Shapiro  trades  in  Bladen’s  colossal  sculpture  for  smaller,  two  dimensional  form.      

–  She  later  described  this  work  as  an3cipa3ng  her  vaginal  imagery,  a  vocabulary  she  realized  with  fellow  feminist,  Judy  Chicago.  

 

Ronald  Bladen,  The  Big  X,  1967.    Painted    wood  and  model  to  be  made  in  metal,  22’8”  x  24’6”.    Fischbach  

Gallery,  NY.  

Miriam  Schapiro,  Big  Ox  No  2,  1968.  Acrylic  on  canvas,  90”  x  

108”.  Museum  of  Contemporary  Art,  San  Diego,  

CA.  

Page 68: Playing by the Rules:  1960s Abstraction: Minimalism

•  Miriam  Shapiro  would  join  forces  with  Judy  Chicago  and  the  two  would  launch  the  first  all  women’s  art  classes.  

•  These  classes  taught  women  not  only  how  to  create  art,  but  the  history  of  female  ar3sts-­‐a  history  that  had  previously  been  stricken  from  the  record.  

•  The  two  would  develop  a  feminist  vocabulary  centered  on  vaginal  imagery.  

 

Miriam  Schapiro,  Big  Ox  No  2,  1968.  Acrylic  on  canvas,  90”  x  

108”.  Museum  of  Contemporary  Art,  San  Diego,  

CA.  

Judy  Chicago,  Car  Hood,  1964.  Sprayed  acrylic  

lacquer  on  Corvair  car  hood,  42  15/16”  x  49  3/16”  x  4  5/16”.  Moderna  Museet,  

Stockholm.