41
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Ms.Sadhana Banerji Assistant Professor- NDIM

Performance Appraisal Methods

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance Appraisal Methods

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Ms.Sadhana BanerjiAssistant Professor-NDIM

Page 2: Performance Appraisal Methods

MEANING OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

PERFORMANCE- It refers to the degree of accomplishment of the tasks that make up an individuals job. it indicates how well an individual is fulfilling the job requirement.

APPRAISAL- assessment, evaluation, judgment, review, consideration

Act of evaluation of performance

Page 3: Performance Appraisal Methods

???????????IS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL.

Basically it is systematic process involving 3 steps:

Setting work standards

Assessing employees actual performance relative to these standards

Offering feedback to the employee so that he can eliminate deficiencies and improve performance in the course of time.

Page 4: Performance Appraisal Methods

Definition of performance appraisal Written assessments of employees carries out in a

systematic way at regular intervals. It is a process of evaluating an employee’s

performance and the qualifications of the employee in terms of the requirements of the job for which

he/she is employed.

Page 5: Performance Appraisal Methods

Features of Performance appraisal

It tries to find out how well the employee is performing the job and tries to establish a plan for further improvement.

It is carried out periodically. It is not one shot deal.

It is not past oriented activity.Performance appraisal is not job

evaluation.

Page 6: Performance Appraisal Methods

OBJECTIVES OF PA

1.1. To improve the performance of the To improve the performance of the organisationorganisation

2.2. To assess actual against expected performanceTo assess actual against expected performance

3.3. To assist subordinate to improve own performance.To assist subordinate to improve own performance.

4.4. To contribute to determining fair rewardsTo contribute to determining fair rewards

5.5. To identify employees suitable for promotionTo identify employees suitable for promotion

6.6. To contribute to development of individualsTo contribute to development of individuals

Page 7: Performance Appraisal Methods

BENEFITS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

It provides a scientific basis for judging the merits or worth of employees who will try to improve their performance.

It provides a sound basis for promotion , demotion, transfer or termination.

It helps in distinguishing between efficient and in efficient workers. In this way it actually reveals the defects in the selection procedure.

Page 8: Performance Appraisal Methods

BENEFITS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL TO THE MANAGER

It helps the supervisors to evaluate the performance and to know the potentials of their subordinates systematically.

It also help to assign work to individual for which they are best suited.

If the performance appraisal is done scientifically and systematically ,it will prevent employee grievance.

Page 9: Performance Appraisal Methods

Uses of Performance Appraisal

PerformancePerformanceAppraisalAppraisal

Giving Performance Giving Performance FeedbackFeedback

Administering Wages Administering Wages and Salariesand Salaries

Identifying Strengths Identifying Strengths and Weaknessesand Weaknesses

Page 10: Performance Appraisal Methods

What to Evaluate?

Traits MeasuresAre an assessment of what the employee is,

not what the employee actually does.Behavior-based measures

Focus on what an employee does and what the employee should do differently.

Results-based measuresFocus is on accomplishments or outcomes that

can be measured objectively.

Page 11: Performance Appraisal Methods

How to Evaluate?

Relative Assessment Employees are measured against other

employees and ranked on their distance from the next higher to the next lower performing employee.

Absolute Measurement Employees are all measured strictly by

absolute performance requirements or standards of their jobs.

Page 12: Performance Appraisal Methods

The Appraisal Process

Establish Performance Standard 1.

Communicate the Standard2.

Measures actual Performance3.

Compare actual performance with Standards 4.

Taking corrective Action, if necessary5.

Page 14: Performance Appraisal Methods

Performance appraisal

Individual evaluation1. Confidential report2. Essay evaluation3. Critical incident4. Checklist5. Graphic rating scales6. Forced choice method7. MBO

Page 15: Performance Appraisal Methods

Individual evaluation method)

1.FREE ESSAY

In this method the rater is asked to express the strong as well as weak point of the behavior.

It describes an employee's actions rather than indicating an actual rating

Page 16: Performance Appraisal Methods

Essay contd…

While preparing the essay on the employee the rater considers the following factors:

a)Job knowledge

b)Employees understanding of the company’s programmes, policies.

c)Employee relations with co –workers and superiors.

d)The attitudes and the perceptions of the employee.

Page 17: Performance Appraisal Methods
Page 18: Performance Appraisal Methods

2.CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD

Critical incidents are behaviors that result in good or poor job performance.

Such incidents are recorded by the superiors. The rater plays the role of ‘Observer’ rather

than ‘Judge’.

For e.g. “I saw Mishra closing the steam line valve

at the instant the pipeline burst. We could save a lot of lives due to the above factor.”

Page 19: Performance Appraisal Methods

CHECKLIST

A check list represents in its simplest form ,a set of objectives or descriptive statements about the employee and his behavior.

Checklists consist of groups of statements that pertain to a given job.

For e.g. I. is the employee really interested in the task?

Yes/No II.Does he respects his superior? Yes/No

Page 20: Performance Appraisal Methods

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE (GRS)

I. In this method a printed form is used to evaluate the performance of an employee.

II. A variety of traits may be used in these types of rating devices .

III. In a Graphic Rating Scale, the rater assesses a rate on performance-related characteristics and personality characteristics,

ie. factors like quantity of work, dependability, job knowledge, cooperativeness, ability to lead, interpersonal skills, etc. by using a rating scale.

Page 21: Performance Appraisal Methods
Page 22: Performance Appraisal Methods
Page 23: Performance Appraisal Methods

Forced Choice Method

A rating technique specially designed to increase objectivity and to decrease biasing factors in ratings.

It comprises of the use of statements that are grouped into sets according to certain statistical properties.

Rater is “forced” to select from each group of statements a subset (usually 2) of those statements which is most or least descriptive of the employee.

Page 24: Performance Appraisal Methods

For e.g..

Least Most A Does not anticipate A difficulties B Grasps explanation B easily and quickly

C Does not waste time C

D Very easy to talk to D

Page 25: Performance Appraisal Methods

Multiple –person evaluation methods

1. Ranking

2. Paired Comparison

3. Forced Distribution

Page 26: Performance Appraisal Methods

1.Alternation ranking

Page 27: Performance Appraisal Methods

2.PAIRED COMPARISON: For the trait “Creativity”

_+++EESHWAR

+_++DILIP

_++_CHARLES

____BHAVANA

__++ARUP

EESHWARDILIPCHARLESBHAVANAARUP

Page 28: Performance Appraisal Methods

Forced distribution

One of the errors in rating is leniency i.e. Clustering a large number of employees

around a high point on a rating scale. This method compel the rater to

distribute the rates on all points on the rating.

For e.g. the following distribution might be assumed to exist – excellent 10%,good 20%,average 40%,below average 20%.

Page 29: Performance Appraisal Methods

3.Forced Distribution

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Low Low-avg

Avg High-avg

High

LowLow-avgAvgHigh-avgHigh

Page 30: Performance Appraisal Methods
Page 31: Performance Appraisal Methods

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES

The use of Management By Objectives was first widely advocated in the 1950s by the noted management theorist Peter Drucker.

MBO requires the management to set specific measurable goals with each employee.

This technique emphasis anticipatively set goals(that are agreed upon by the superior and the employee).

Page 32: Performance Appraisal Methods

MBO………(process)

1. Set the organizational goals2. Set departmental goals3. Discuss departmental goals4. Define expected results5. Performance reviews6. Provide feedback

Page 33: Performance Appraisal Methods
Page 34: Performance Appraisal Methods

360 Degree Appraisal

A 360 degree appraisal system collects performance information from multiple parties, that interact with the employee on a routine basis.

Generate more accurate feedback by gathering information from people about an individual’s performance .

It was originally developed by TV Rao in mid eighties at IIM ,A.

Page 35: Performance Appraisal Methods

18–35

360 DEGREES

Page 36: Performance Appraisal Methods

Parties involved

1. Supervisors2. Peers3. Subordinates4. customer

Page 37: Performance Appraisal Methods

360 Degree Appraisals

Supervisors

Peers Outsiders

Subordinates

Page 38: Performance Appraisal Methods

Parties involved……

1. Supervisor –It includes supervisor of the employee having knowledge about the work of the employee. General practice is that immediate superiors.

2. Peers-Peer rating may reliable in rating behavior and manner of performance.

3. Subordinates-the concept of having superiors rated by subordinated .

4. Customers- employee performance in terms of behavior ,promptness ,speed in doing the job can be better judged by customers.

Page 39: Performance Appraisal Methods

Contd……..

Corporation like GE, Reliance, Wipro,Infosys,SBI,Aditya Birla

Group are all using this tool to discover home truth about their managers.

For e.g. If manager has 6 subordinates ,the manager does not know which subordinates said what ,the result are summarized and averaged.

It may be possible one may criticize the boss for standing too close to people ,another may comment on boss’s aggressive tone.

Page 40: Performance Appraisal Methods

Factors that can Distort Appraisals

1. First Impression The appraisers first impression of a candidate

may color his evaluation of all subsequent behavior.

2. Personal prejudice if the rater dislikes any employee or any

group ,he may rate them at the lower end .3. Halo effect: when one aspect of the

subordinate's performance affects the rater’s evaluation of the other performance.

Page 41: Performance Appraisal Methods

Factors that can Distort Appraisals

4. Central tendency: Play safe policy in rating by rating all the

employees around the middle point of the rating scale and they avoid rating the people at both the extremes of the scale.

5 .The Leniency and Strictness: 6. The Recency effect: The raters generally remember the recent

actions of the employee at the time of rating and rate on the basis of these recent action.