Upload
-
View
68
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Flow, Discourse Maxims, and Studying Southern Min in the Dyadic Language Learning
Context at a Private Language School in Taiwan
Timothy R. Erb
Advisor: Robert Emil Johanson
Department of Applied Foreign Languages.
National Taiwan University of Science & Technology June 10, 2009
1. Instructor: Goa chiok huan-hi koa tiu li. Li gin-a-jit ho bo?[16:03:25] (I am very happy to see you. How are you today?)
2. Participant: Ho. Ho. Goa gin-a-jit fei-hsiung ho![16:03:37] (Good. Good. I am really well today!)
3. Instructor: [3-second pause ] Pai-sei, ho, it dieng ai gong “hui-hsiung” ho. Goa ka li kong, “fei-hsiung” si kok-gi.[16:03:43] (I’m sorry, um, you should say “hui-hsiung” good. Let me tell you, “fei-hsiung” is Chinese.)
4. Participant: A ne oh. “fei-hsiung” shi kok-gi. Pai-sei. Goa it-dieng ai gong “hui-hsiung” ho. Dio-bo?[16:03:58] (Oh, so that’s how it is. “Fei-hsiung” is Chinese. I’m sorry. I really should say “hui-hsiung” good. Right?)
5. Instructor: [4-second pause] Dio, dio! Li gin a jit bei bai.[16:04:20] (Correct, correct! You’re in good form today.)
Introductory Data Sample
"My heart begins to sync with the rhythm "My heart begins to sync with the rhythm [physiological] of the class and it's like a [physiological] of the class and it's like a language tango with the teacher. My body is language tango with the teacher. My body is into it and I feel myself feeling interested into it and I feel myself feeling interested about something again and I move around about something again and I move around and get theatrical and act things out."and get theatrical and act things out."
The instructor opens class effectively allowing the focal participant to achieve flow
This is probably due to her pausing (wait time) and positive reinforcement
The participant’s comment regarding this class.
Introduction Csikszentmihalyi’s Concept of Flow Flow SLA Applications
Purpose of the Study Research Questions Dyadic Language Learning Context Grice’s Discourse Maxim’s The Study
Research Site Focal Participant Pilot Study
Data Analysis Results/Findings Limitations Discussion Pedagogical Implications
Presentation OverviewPresentation Overview
IntroductionIntroduction
Csikszentmihalyi’s Concept of Flow
(A metaphor for the learning process which includes full concentration on an activity to the point that one loses all sense of space and time.)
Challenge/skills congruence Merging of action and awareness Clear proximal goals Intense concentration on the task Perceived sense of control Loss of reflective self-consciousness Time distortion Autotelic experience
Components of Flow
Flow SLA Applications
Schmidt & Savage (1992): Thai EFL students comparing English learning with other activities
Schmidt, Boraie, and Kassagby (1996) on Egyptian EFL learners exploring the participants’ flow experiences in the classroom language learning context
Snyder & Tardy (2001): Turkish University EFL teachers’ in-class flow experiences
Egbert (2003): Spanish FL classroom language
learning tasks to investigate flow occurrences
Mitigate the dearth of studies conducted in dyadic LL context
Apply concept of flow to LL context
Address gap in the SLA research relating flow to infrequently studied languages, Asian languages, or languages at risk such as the Southern Min Language (SML)
Purpose of the Study
I. To what extent (if at all) did the focal participant achieve flow?
II. What are the indicators (if any) that the focal participant achieved flow?
III. Which factors (if any) prevented the focal participant from achieving flow?
IV. How did the focal participant react in situations in which flow did not occur?
V. What pedagogical and practical implications can be derived from this study?
Research Questions
Vastly different than large group learning settings
A “balancing act among potentially conflicting forces” (Wolff, 2000, p. 44, as cited in Thonus)
Classroom discourse takes on characteristics different than other forms of spoken language (Atkins, 2001)
“(C)ontact zones” (Pratt, 1991) where two cultures meet
Sites of interactional dominance can arise (Thonus, 2004)
Teacher as mediator between two cultures (Gibbons, 2006).
Dyadic Language Learning Context
GriceGrice’’s Discourse Maxims Discourse Maxim’’ssGrice divided normal discourse between two or more Grice divided normal discourse between two or more
parties into the following four parties into the following four maximsmaxims:: 1. Quantity1. Quantity: An individual: An individual’’s contribution to discourse s contribution to discourse
should be adequately should be adequately informativeinformative and not be over and not be over informative;informative;
2. Quality2. Quality: Contributions within discourse should be : Contributions within discourse should be
based on evidence, should be truthful;based on evidence, should be truthful; 3. Relation3. Relation: Contributions should be relevant;: Contributions should be relevant; 4. 4. MannerManner: Ambiguity, unnecessary prolixity, and : Ambiguity, unnecessary prolixity, and
obscurity of expression should be avoided and order obscurity of expression should be avoided and order should be maintained. should be maintained.
Evolved from conversations between the researcher and the focal participant regarding the importance of learning SML to decrease social distance (Schuman & Johnson, 1976) and increase intrinsic motivation (Gardner, 1985)
The focal participant enrolled in SML courses
The researcher set out to conduct a case study of the focal participant ‘s SML learning experience
The Study
To establish the research site and ensure “prolonged engagement”, the researcher also enrolled in SML lessons at the research site with the focal participant’s instructor
The researcher entered the study and research site without a specific research agenda
The researcher did not initially intend to investigate instances of flow in the focal participant’s SML learning
After many discussions of what the focal participant reported concerning his SML learning the concept of flow was decided to be representative of what he was experiencing in class
A city in northern Taiwan
Views itself as leader in the teaching and learning in Chinese and SML language education in Taiwan
The Research Site
North American forty-odd years young
Had lived in Taiwan for seven years
First came to Taiwan in 1989
Ten years prior, had studied one year of intensive SML in Taichung, Taiwan
Was studying SML for autotelic reasons
The Focal Participant
Shaped in advance of the main study as the chief haped in advance of the main study as the chief researcher endeavored to set its parameters and researcher endeavored to set its parameters and examine in detail the relevance of the researchexamine in detail the relevance of the research
Began as the chief researcher’s self study of his own egan as the chief researcher’s self study of his own learning of SML and was conducted over a three week learning of SML and was conducted over a three week periodperiod
Data consisted of class recordings, the chief ata consisted of class recordings, the chief researcher/participant’s class notes, the chief researcher/participant’s class notes, the chief researcher/participant’s reflective journal, and his daily researcher/participant’s reflective journal, and his daily log of his SML learning and acquisition experiencelog of his SML learning and acquisition experience
Pilot Study
Data Gathering Instruments(structured and semi-structured) interviews; the participant’s reflective journal;audio-recordings of class meetings; class notes; non-participant observation; personal communication; and stimulated recall sessions of
aforementioned data sources
Data Analysis
Strauss and Corbin’s (1990) grounded theoretical recursive coding procedures (open, axial and selective)
Upon completion of the open coding the researcher looked for salient features in the data
Next, the researcher selectively separated the most salient features in the data from which the findings emerged
Triangulation implemented by comparing salient features that emerged from the several data gathering instruments
Flow experience both physiological and mental
Focal participant appeared to be addicted to the “flow state”
Focal participant frustrated with himself (e.g., for wasting the time and money) and the instructor (e.g., for not letting him converse freely during class)
Results/Findings
If instructor proffered scaffolded review within the first 5 to 7 minutes of class participant reached flow
This ‘flow window’ set the tone for the remainder of the 50 minute class period
If participant entered flow at the beginning of class he was able to engage in discourse throughout the class period and have an autolelic experience
His immense enjoyment of the autotelic experience prompted the researcher to term this as an “autotelic buzz”
When unable to achieve flow, however, the focal participant experienced extreme discomfort
"Can’t believe I’m spending so much [flow impedance] money on “listening class”. I should be prepping for my teaching classes. Waste of time." (online chat interview) “Today things were over my head, great to listen to her accent, but can’t understand many things…I politely tried to slow her down, [flow impedance] but didn’t' know how to do it, [desire to prolong autotelic buzz] and was overwhelmed" (discussion interview)
The focal participant found this ‘autotelic buzz’ to be addictive
He often sought means of ensuring that he would reach the flow state He drafted a ‘top fifteen’ list of previously-covered terms to usurp control of the class to regain his autotelic “fix”
Method kept the teacher on-track ensuring that scaffolded review occurred at the beginning of class, facilitating flow and allowing the participant to have an autotelic experience
A problem in the area of interactive dominance emerged
The teacher challenged his attempts to slow down the pace of her instruction
Instructor often thwarted his efforts at controlling class content
The participant did not reach flow when beginning of class scaffolding did not occur
He “jonesed” for flow achievement and was unable to enter flow at a later point during class
He then encountered a ‘flow downer’ as the result of his apparent addiction of sorts to the in-class autotelic subcategory of flow while learning SML
Participant was distraught and experienced negative physiological symptoms when instructor impeded his flow experience
The focal participant reportedly achieved flow on several occasions, and his reaching of the flow state was a physical and mental state that appeared to have addictive qualities
He reported that these ‘flow downers’ led to his abandonment of the study of the language
Chief researcher is primary research instrument in QR
Focal participant studied several languages previously
Findings herein not generalizable to other languages
LIMITATIONS
Flow defies quantification (like Krashen’s SLL Hypotheses)
Others might have interpreted things differently
Investigation of flow in dyadic student-teacher language learning important
Nature of student-teacher interaction might influence a learner’s chances of entering flow
This study argues for a more aggressive stance to be taken on what it means to “enable” or “disable” a learner from achieving flow
When flow is viewed from this perspective, it might gain the credibility it deserves as an accurate depiction of the give and take that exists in the dyadic one-on-one language-learning and teaching environment
DISCUSSION
Participant experienced an ‘autotelic buzz’ when able to converse freely with the instructor
This echoes Well’s (1992) notion that "(T)he prevailing tone of discourse emphasizes the dialogic co-construction of meaning rather than the teacher's authoritative transmission of information” (p. 22)
When the focal participant was unable to reach flow, it was evident that the instructor was completely ignorant of the need for an advance organizer (Ausubel, 1968) to assist in guiding the learner into the lesson
The instructor not being aware that the tone of in-class teacher-student discourse influences the dialogic co-construction of meaning impeded flow entry on a number of occasions and the participant’s fluency in SML was impeded (Wells, 1992).
The instructor often impeded the focal participants flow entry by failing to adhere to three of Grice’s four Discourse Maxims (1975),
When the instructor spoke in detail about private matters in her life she the instructor spoke in detail about private matters in her life she violated the first maxim of Quantity, as her contributions were overly violated the first maxim of Quantity, as her contributions were overly informativeinformative
The instructor’s violation of the third maxim of Relevance, was closely The instructor’s violation of the third maxim of Relevance, was closely related to her excesses when not adhering to the parameters of the first related to her excesses when not adhering to the parameters of the first maxim in that her contributions were over-informative and completely maxim in that her contributions were over-informative and completely irrelevant to the participant’s SML studies.irrelevant to the participant’s SML studies.
Finally the instructor violated Grice’s fourth maxim of Manner, by Finally the instructor violated Grice’s fourth maxim of Manner, by exercising a complete lack of order, spoke ambiguously and obscurely, exercising a complete lack of order, spoke ambiguously and obscurely, and during class time was and during class time was unable to avoid unnecessary prolixity
Dyadic L2-context instructors should prepare advance organizers (Ausubel, 1968)
Teachers should offer scaffolded review at the beginning of class and allow balanced turn-taking in the classroom
Flow should be considered as a teaching goal rather than merely a passive state
PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
REFERENCES
Atkins, A. (2001). Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’ model in a one-to-one classroom: An analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://www.bham.ac.uk/resources/essays/Atkins_4.pdf
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Education psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Boston: MIT Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Geirland, J. (1996). Go with the Flow: An interview with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Wired, 4, 9.
Gibbons, P. (1999). Discourse contexts for second language development in the mainstream classroom. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL Classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. New York: Continuum.
Nelson, G. L., & Weigle, S. C. (2004). Novice tutors and their ESL tutees: Three case studies of tutor roles and perceptions of tutorial success. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 203-225.
Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33-40.
Schmidt, R., & Savage, W. (1992). Challenge, skill and motivation. PASAA, 22, 14-28.
Schuman, H., & Johnson, M. P. (1976). Attitudes and behavior. In A. Inkeles (Ed.), Annual Review of Sociology (pp. 161-207). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Productions
Wells, G. (1992). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Paper presented at the annual National Council of Teachers of English Conference. Louisville, KY.
Wolff, J. M. (2000). Tutoring in the “contact zone.” In L. Briggs & M. Woolbright (Eds.), Stories from the center: Connecting narrative and theory in the writing center (pp.43-50). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
.