68
HOLGER DALKMANN, DIRECTOR, EMBARQ, WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE NEXT STATION: OUR LOW-CARBON FUTURE En Route to a Transportwende? Climate Solutions for the Transportation Sector - Nov. 24, 2014

Next Station: Our Low Carbon Future

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

HOLGER DALKMANN, DIRECTOR, EMBARQ, WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE

NEXT STATION: OUR LOW-CARBON FUTUREEn Route to a Transportwende?Climate Solutions for the Transportation Sector - Nov. 24, 2014

THE URBANIZATION CHALLENGE• Over 50% of the global population now live in cities and urban

areas, rising to 70% by 2050.

Billion People

0

2

4

6

8

10

20502040203020202010200019901980197019601950

Global population

Urban population

Rural population

70%

50%

30%

Cities

CITIES: ENGINES OF GROWTH AND PROSPERITY• The 150 largest metropolitan economies account for 14% of

global population yet generate 41% of global GDP

CITIES ARE KEY DRIVERS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH

Note: Population split from 2011, GDP split estimate from Grubler et al 2007 cited in GEA 2012, Energy use split from GEA 2005, Emissions from World Energy Outlook 2006 SOURCE: World UrbanisationProspects, Grubler et al 2007, GEA 2012, WEO 2006

52% of Population

80% of GDP

250 million1970

1 billion

2010

3 billion?

2050

Stock of Motorcars

ReducedGap

BRIDGING THE GAP TO A 2 DEGREE SCENARIO

Reference: UNEP 2013 Gap Report

Transport1.7 – 2.5 Gt

2 degreescenario

17GtGapBusiness

As Usual

2 degreescenario

THE CHALLENGE – 23% REDUCTION FOR 2°AND $20T

Source: IEA (2012) Energy Technology Perspectives

42,971

33,194

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

Road

 Travel (Billion

 Veh

‐Km)

4 Degree Scenario 2 Degree Scenario

RELATED HEALTH & SAFETY IMPACTS

Source: EMBARQ Analysis, Duduta and Hidalgo (2013)

3,783,009

5,098,418

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

Worldwide an

nual traffic

 fatalities

2 Degree Scenario 4 Degree Scenario

Source: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/package/index_en.htm

EU commitment: 40 % GHG reduction by

2030

Norway – Carbon Neutrality by 2030 (for negotiation at Paris)

COST OF CONGESTION IN EU

COSTS OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION

Sources: Christidis, P. and Ibáñez Rivas, J. N., 2012. Measuring Road Congestion. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain.

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Total EU Germany France UK

Annual Cost of Congestion (€B)

Cost of Congestion as% of GDP 2009

• In Europe €110Bn is lost annually due to traffic congestion

COSTS OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION

Sources: IBM Institute for Business Value, Smarter cities for smarter growth. Li-Zeng Mao, Hong-Ge Zhu, and Li-RenDuan (2012) The Social Cost of Traffic Congestion and Countermeasures in Beijing. Sustainable Transportation Systems: pp. 68-76.

4.2% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0%3.4%

2.6% 2.4% 2.1% 1.8%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Perc

enta

ge o

f GD

P

Cost of Traffic Congestion as a Percentage of GDP

Traffic congestion costs some cities more than 4% of GDP

AIR QUALITY IMPACTS

AIR QUALITY IMPACTS

Source: World Health Organisation: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.wrapper.ENVHEALTH3

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

New

Yor

kLo

s An

gele

sC

hica

goB

ueno

s A

ires

Sao

Pau

loR

io d

e Ja

neiro

Bog

ota

Mex

ico

City

Lim

aP

aris

Ess

enM

osco

wIs

tanb

ulLo

ndon

Kin

shas

aC

airo

Tehr

anBa

ghda

dLa

gos

Joha

nnes

burg

Shan

ghai

Beiji

ngG

uang

zhou

She

nzhe

nTi

anjin

Don

ggua

nC

heng

duW

uhan

Cho

ngqu

ngH

angz

hou

Hon

g Ko

ngTo

kyo

Osa

kaN

agoy

aM

anila

Seou

lTa

ipei

Ban

gkok

Ho

Chi

Min

h C

ityD

haka

Del

hiM

umba

iC

alcu

ttaC

henn

aiBe

ngal

uru

Hyd

erab

adAh

med

abad

Jaka

rtaK

arac

hiLa

hore

North America

Latin America

Europe & Central

Asia

Middle-east & North Africa

East Asia & Pacific South Asia

WHO air quality standard PM10 <20 per m3

Particulate matter per m3 for top 50 cities – higher particulate matter means worse air quality

• Of a selection of the world’s biggest cities by population none meet WHO air quality standards

LOCAL ISSUES: ROAD SAFETY

LOCAL ISSUES: PHYSICAL INACTIVITY

3.2 million people are affected for illnesses derived from physical inactivity and obesity

“BUSINESS AS USUAL” IS BREAKING DOWN

LOST ACCESSIBILITYLOST TIME

LOST PUBLIC SPACELOST HEALTH

CIGARETTE SMOKING

• Percentage decrease in the adult population who smokes daily from 2000 – 2010

Source: OECD Health Data 2012; Eurostat Statistics Database; WHO Global Infobase.

11.3%

13.7%

20.4%

40.6%

16.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

CIGARETTE SMOKING

• Percentage decrease in the adult population who smokes daily from 2000 – 2010

Source: OECD Health Data 2012; Eurostat Statistics Database; WHO Global Infobase.

11.3%

13.7%

20.4%

40.6%

16.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

WHERE DO PEOPLE STAY?

IHG•65 years•645K rooms•100 countries

Hilton•93 years•610K rooms•88 countries

Accor•44 years•530K rooms•92 countries

Airbnb•4 years•650K rooms•192 countries

PARADIGM SHIFT: NEW YORK CITY

PARADIGM SHIFT IN US?• Proportion of population with driving licenses by age (2002-2008)

Source: Sivak and Schoettle, 2011 http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/86680/102764.pdf

BUILD ON GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES:

• Portland City’s transportation policies save its residents $2.6 billion that can be invested in the local economy.

Source: “Portland’s Green Dividend,” Joe Cortright,  CEO for Cities (2007). 24

PARADIGM SHIFT? NORWAY• Proportion of population with driving licenses by age (1991-2009)

Source: Sivak and Schoettle, 2011 http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/86680/102764.pdf

HAVE WE HIT PEAK TRAVEL?

• Passenger kilometers by private car & light truck 1990-2009 • (Index 1990=100)

Source: International Transport Forum 2012

Cheonggyecheon, Seoul, South Korea

PARADIGM SHIFT: TREND VS. LEAPFROGGING

WHAT WOULD A PARADIGM SHIFT LOOK LIKE?

Emission Reduction + Co-benefits

Technology Improvements

Public Transport

Non-motorizedTransport

Urbandevelopmentand transport

integration

AVOID SHIFT IMPROVE

AVOID-SHIFT-IMPROVE (ASI) APPROACH

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE LOW CARBON FUTURE

DEMAND

SUPPLY

Accessibility

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE LOW CARBON FUTURE

DEMAND Accessibility

ATLANTA VS. BARCELONA• The 2 have similar populations and wealth levels, but very

different carbon productivities.

ATLANTA’S BUILT-UP AREA BARCELONA’S BUILT-UP AREA

Population: 2.5 millionUrban area: 4,280 km2

Transport carbon emissions: 7.5tonnes CO2 per person (public+ private transport)

Population: 2.8 millionUrban area: 162 km2

Transport carbon emissions: 0.7tonnes CO2 per person (public+ private transport)

Source: Laconte, P., Urban and Transport Management - International Trends and Practices, in International Symposium "Sustainable Urban Transport and City. 2005, Tongji University and Nagoya University: Shanghai, carfreeinbigd.com, chron.com/the highwayman, ec.Europa.eu for emissions for Copenhagen, World Bank for emissions for Houston

HOUSTON VS. COPENHAGEN• Contrast shows the economic benefits and cost savings from

mass transit and compactness

Source: Laconte, P., Urban and Transport Management - International Trends and Practices, in International Symposium "Sustainable Urban Transport and City. 2005, Tongji University and Nagoya University: Shanghai, carfreeinbigd.com, chron.com/the highwayman, ec.Europa.eu for emissions for Copenhagen, World Bank for emissions for Houston

Houston Copenhagen

Population density: 3,500 per sq/mi

~4% of people use public transport, 95%of trips are by car

14% of local GDP spent on transportation

Emissions per capita (tCO2e/capita): 14.1

Population density: 17,000 per sq/mi

~46% of people use public transport, cycling also common

4% of local GDP spent on transportation

Emissions per capita (tCO2e/capita): 4.7

CHOICES MATTER• Cities & countries with similar levels of GDP per capita can have

vastly different carbon emissions

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000

Germany

HamburgUK

France

Canada

Paris

LondonNew York City

USAAustralia

Sydney

TorontoCape Town

ShanghaiSouth Africa

MexicoMexico City

São Paulo

BrazilChinaIndia

Delhi

Per C

apita

CO

2 Em

issi

ons

(tonn

es)

GDP per capita (2008 USD)

COMPACT AND CONNECTED URBAN PATHWAYS CAN GO HAND IN HAND WITH ECONOMIC GROWTH

Source: Rode, Floater et al. 2013; Floater, Rode et al. 2013, 2014.

Savings in global infrastructure spending to 2030 from more compact, connected urban

development

Source: New Climate Economy analysis.

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

COPENHAGEN’S “FINGER PLAN”

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN KBV

VEHICLE DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Source: EMBARQ http://thecityfix.com/blog/on-the-move-limiting-car-usage-vehicle-demand-management-industrialized-economies-heshuang-zeng/vehicle-demand-management-strategies-embarq/

LOW EMISSION ZONES

13

48

71 79

131

151

192

226

0

50

100

150

200

250

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

# of

LEZ

Citi

es in

EU

GERMAN LOW EMISSION ZONES

CONGESTION PRICING

Year

LONDON STOCKHOLM

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE LOW CARBON FUTURE

SUPPLY Accessibility

NEW TRENDS ON THE RISE

Source: EMBARQ; http://thecityfix.com/blog/on-the-move-advancing-sustainable-transport-getting-from-here-to-there-holger-dalkmann/

HIGH LEVEL OF SERVICE BUSES IN EUROPE

Source: (Finn et. al, 2011)

Cambridge, UK

BRT AND BUSWAY SYSTEMS IN THE WORLD

Source: EMBARQ, 2011

Planned / in construction(82 cities)

In expansion(23 cities)

In operation(163 cities)

BRT GROWTH IN EUROPE

Source: BRTdata.org

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Cumulative System

 Total

New

 BRT

 Systems

New Systems Cumulative Total

KEY BHLS COMPONENTS

Running ways

Stations

Vehicles

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), operation 

management tools 

Identity of the BHLS scheme

BHLS IN EUROPE

Country Cities with BHLS

England Cambridge, Crawley, Dartford, Leeds

France Lille, Lorient, Lyon, Nantes, Paris, Rennes, Rouen, Toulouse

Germany Essen, Hamburg, Oberhausen

Ireland Dublin

Italy Brescia*, Pisa, Prato

Netherlands Alkmaar, Almere, Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Twente, Utrecht

Spain Barcelona*, Castellón, Madrid

Sweden Gothenburg, Jönköping, Lund, Stockholm

Source: Brendan FinnETTS Ltd., Ireland

GLOBAL GROWTH OF CAR SHARE 2000-2012

CAR SHARING• For every shared car, there are 15 fewer owned cars on

the road. (Source: Zipcar)

Source: http://futureofcarsharing.com/

GLOBAL GROWTH OF BIKE-SHARE 2000-2013

Source: Peter Midgely and EMBARQ

BIKE SHARING IN LONDON & MADRID

Photo source: Flickr user shaggy359,

LONDON MADRID

BIKE SHARING SUCCESS FACTORS• Go Big or Go Home

Create a big, dense system with broad coverage or it won’t get used.

• You Get What You Pay ForQuality of infrastructure can make or break a system

• Merge the FinancialsMake the case for subsidies

• Evolve or DisappearEvolving payment systems that work for the new technology

• Connect Across BordersWork with established international service providers with experience

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE LOW CARBON FUTURE – INTEGRATION & DISRUPTION

DEMAND

SUPPLY

DISRUPTIVE SOLUTIONS 

?

ACCESSIBILITY

INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS

BLURRING LINES BETWEEN PUBLIC & PRIVATE

HELSINKI RIDESHARING: KUTSUPLUS & AJELO

RIDESHARING: UBER, LYFT, SIDECAR…

BIG DATA SOLUTIONS

• Real-time traffic and transport data through bus location devices, cell phone data tracking, and crowd-sourced information platforms, like Waze

OPEN SOURCE DATA APPLICATIONS

Within 1 hour: Real-time bus locations on Google Earth

Within 1 week: Desktop widget with transit countdown information

Within 5 weeks: iPhone and Andriod transit tracking & planning apps

• Open source transit data can enable live trip planning tools and other new innovations

• When Boston’s transit authority opened its data in 2009, the results were immediate:

DISRUPTING THE 9-5

• Alternatives to working one 9-5 job for one employer

TELEWORKING

ONLINE SHOPPING & DELIVERY SERVICES

Open Data

Bike Sharing

Car Sharing

CONVENTIONAL SOLUTIONS& INNOVATIVE DISRUPTIONS

Biking Metro

Buses

Walking

5 ELEMENTS FOR TOWARDS A TRANSPORTWENDE

Political Will – Leadership and Community SupportFinance – Sustainable investment in Infrastructure and OperationsIntegrated Planning – Land-use and Sustainable MobilityEnable entrepreneurial environment for disruptive solutionsTechnology as enabler to better cleaner vehicles & integrated (disruptive) solutions

Holger Dalkmann

[email protected]

www.wri.org

www.embarq.org

THANK YOU