24
New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping Remote Sensing – Beyond images. Mexico City, 2013 JOSE A. JIMENEZ-BERNI. CSIRO PLANT INDUSTRY. HIGH RESOLUTION PLANT PHENOMICS CENTRE

New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotypingRemote Sensing – Beyond images. Mexico City, 2013

JOSE A. JIMENEZ-BERNI. CSIRO PLANT INDUSTRY. HIGH RESOLUTION PLANT PHENOMICS CENTRE

Page 2: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Why phenotyping?Why high throughput?

Page 3: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

The High Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre

Director: [email protected]

Page 4: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Breeder’s wish listTable 2. Essential and desirable measurements for phenotyping of yield and other traits across multiple experiments in water-limited and high temperature environments.

Essential (core) Timing A

(frequency)

Desirable Timing A

(frequency)

Plant establishment counts (plants/m2)

DC 12-13 (1×) Canopy light interception (μmol/m2/s)

DC 35-60 (2×)

Ground cover (%) DC 12-37 (3×) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

DC 12-60 (4×)

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

DC 12-37 (2×) Early biomass/leaf area/tiller number DC 30-32

Anthesis date DC 45-65 (every 3d)

Carbon Isotope Discrimination DC 30-32

Canopy temperature (°C) DC 35-70 (2×) Anthesis biomass (g/m2) DC 60-65

Harvest index DC 90 Water soluble carbohydrates DC 65-70 (1×)

Spike number (spikes/m2) DC 90 Canopy temperature during grain filling (°C)

DC 70+ (4×)

Plant height (cm) DC 90

Thousand grain weight (g) DC 90

Grain yield (g/m2) DC 90

Observations and scores (e.g. incomplete plots, temperature damage, disease, lodging, and shattering)

as required

A Timing according to the Zadoks decimal code (DC) for scoring stages of cereal development (Zadoks et al. 1974)

(More info: Rebetzke et al 2012, (http://prometheuswiki.publish.csiro.au/tiki-index.php)

Page 5: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Phenomobile

• 3x LiDARs (Canopy Structure)• 4x RGB cameras (Stereo

reconstruction)• 1x Thermal IR camera (Canopy

temperature)• 1x Hyperspectral line scanner

(Canopy biochemistry)• 1x Full range spectrometer

(Canopy biochemistry)• Removable light banks

LMS400

Canopy

-30� 30�

Canopy Canopy

70�

Page 6: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

y = 0.6624x + 230.77R² = 0.8619

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

LiD

AR

mea

sure

d ca

nopy

hei

ght

(mm

)

Manually measured canopy height (mm)

LiDAR Height Validation

Page 7: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Non-destructive wish listoFractional coveroCrop heightoLAIoCanopy architecture

oGrowth rateoEars / m2oHIoBiomassoCrop yield

LiDAR outputs

Page 8: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Canopy architecture and spike counts

Page 9: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Hyperspectral line scanner and high-res thermal

Page 10: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Phenomobile Lite

Page 11: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Acquisition of airborne thermal imagesThe Airframe

Sensor Integration

The Flight Controller

Page 12: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping
Page 13: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Airborne thermal mosaic – ready for plot extractionLegend [deg C]

~600 m• Capture 3 images / second• One pass of the field ~10 sec (3 passes required)• Time to image entire field ~4 min• Ideal: Simultaneous measurements at nearly a single point in time

“Old way” h2<0.1 “New way” h2>0.6

Page 14: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Extraction of plot temperature

100’s samplesper plot

Page 15: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Wireless infrared thermometers

• Zigbee standard• Selectable sampling interval

(5min)• 3G transmission from base

station• Real time access from Internet• 100 sensors built in 2011• 400 sensors built in 2012• 160 in a single deployment

(Narrabri / Cotton)

Page 16: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Canopy temperature data

Page 17: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Canopy conductance modelling

Page 18: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Other sensors and applications

fAPAR

350 450 550 650 7500

20

40

60

Wavelengh (nm)

Refle

ctan

ce (%

)

Soil moisture Hyperspectral

Page 19: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping
Page 20: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

SensorDB user interface

Page 21: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Virtual laboratory concept. Real time data mining and filtering

Page 22: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

Take home messages

• There are no turnkey solutions• Why use NDVI when you can use LiDAR for direct estimation of

ground cover, plant establishment and potentially LAI or biomass?• Use imaging sensors when possible: extract information from the

right spot, not an integrated observation• Airborne thermography as an alternative to traditional CT

measurements: no changes in environmental conditions and multiple measurements per plot• Wireless sensor networks for dynamic phenotyping applications• Never underestimate the data management component and the

requirements for data processing

Page 23: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

The Plant Phenomics TeamHRPPC / CSIRO PI:Bob FurbankDave DeeryXavier SiraultJose Jimenez-Berni (Berni) Tony CondonScott Chapman & Ed HollandXueqin WangAlyssa WeirmanTony AgostinoPablo Rozas-LarraondoPeter Kuffner & Michael SalimScott KwasnyDac NguyenViri Silva PerezRichard Poire Kath Meacham

CSIRO E-health: Jurgen Fripp & Antony PaprokiOlivier Salvado

CSIRO Informatics:Ali SalehiDoug Palmer & Alex KrumpholDavid LovellPascal VallottonChangming Sun

ANU:Murray BadgerSusanne von Caemmerer

CIMMYTMatthew Reynolds Team

USDA : John Vogel Team

Page 24: New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping

For more information:

[email protected]

http://hrppc.org.au

CSIRO PLANT INDUSTRY / HIGH RESOLUTION PLANT PHENOMICS CENTRE

Thank you / Gracias