Naranpura – Ward no 12

Naranpura

Memnagar

Chandlodia

WadejGhatlodia

Alagarsamy Nikhil Sandeep Nipun Niepukhrie Hardik

Distances from major destinations in Ahmedabad

Kalupur Railway St. 8..4 KmAirport 8 KmCG Road 2.5 KmAshram Road 6.5 KmSG Highway 6.1 KmUniversity 1.5 KmWalled City 5.0 Km

Area 2.62 sq.km. (262 ha)

Population 83272 (Census 2001)

Density 318 pph

Road Length 20.30 Km

Road Density 6.13 Km/sq.km.

• 1970 - Authorities Tried To Restrict The Growth of the city by proposing a

Green Buffer.

• 1987 to 90 - Encroachments started happening in Green Belt. Then,

Authorities

• allowed Housing Board to develop some of the area for Residential.

• 1991 - Population – 63,293 [Source: Census 1991]Density – 180 persons per hectare.

2001- Population – 83,272 [Source: Census 2001]Density – 237 persons per hectare.Population Growth – 31%2009- BRTS was introduced on the132’ ring road2011- Population – 88,200[Source: Census 2011]Density – 266 persons per hectare.Population Growth – 6.02%

T

i

m

e

l

i

n

e

P

e

o

p

l

e

Religion Mostly Hindus (Low diversity)

Region Mostly Gujratis(some Rajasthanis and Marathis)

Income Higher MIG and HIG

Occupation Mostly Business class

Slums Almost 25% population living in slums and Gamtal

Sanjay Nagar

Chamunda NagarGamtal Slums next to railway track

Ward Area (ha) Population Density (pph)

Naranpura (Actual) 331.57 83272 251.14

Naranpura (Effective) 262.02 83272 317.81

Chandolia 369 62540 169.49

Ranip 324 87906 271.31

Naroda Road 352 83751 237.93

Bapunagar 175.6 90031 512.71

Paldi 455 74957 164.74

Vejalpur 369 113445 307.44

Maninagar 274 87900 320.80

Isanpur 391 113949 291.43

Ahmedabad City(AMC) 19084 3520085 184.45

Ahmedabad Old City 560.00

0.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

Naranpura (Actual)

Naranpura (Effective)

Chandolia

Ranip

Naroda Road

Bapunagar

Paldi

Vejalpur

Maninagar

Isanpur

Ahmedabad City(AMC)

Ahmedabad Old City

D

e

n

s

i

t

i

e

s

GROSS FSI : 0.98

B

u

i

l

d

i

n

g

H

e

i

g

h

t

s

R

o

a

d

H

i

e

r

a

r

c

h

y

Functional Hierarchy Road Lengths

• BRTS – 2.997 km • Arterial – km • Collector – 17.697km

-

500.00

1,000.00

1,500.00

2,000.00

2,500.00

3,000.00

3,500.00

4,000.00

4,500.00

40m -BRTS

30m 28m 25m 22m 20m 18m 16m 15m 12m 9m

2,029.84

3,055.54

733.64 884.54

335.10

1,328.24

4,430.30

2,338.37

1,276.35

2,093.22 1,792.11

Ro

ad L

en

gth

(in

M)

Road Type

Existing Road Length

E

x

i

s

t

i

n

g

l

a

n

d

u

s

e

Demand 48%

Distribution 52%

Demand Vs Distribution

Treatment Capacity

63%

Storage Capacity

37%

Treatment Vs Storage Capacity

Distribution

22%

Treatment Capacity

78%

Distribution Vs Treatment

•Water lines in this ward are covering 98% of Area (Grid Design)

•Diameter of pipes varies from 80mm to 750mm

The Water supply per day is 13.75 MLD and existing storage tanks in 3 locations are able to store 28.5 ML, which will be able to support for future expansion.

The Water supply from 5.30 am to 8.00 am as Staggered supply. Source from French Well in Sabarmati & Narmada river.

48 48

19.37

28.53

13.75 14.553

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2001 2011

Qu

anti

ty (

in M

LD)

Years

Water Supply Status (Existing)

Treatment Capacity

Storage

Supply

Facts About Existing Situation

•Normal Days 165 LPCD

•During Festival Season 180 LPCD

•Water Demand 12.49 ML

•Water Distribution 13.75 ML

•Storage Capacity 28.53 ML

•(OH 0.75ML + 9.46 ML UG & 2 * 9.16 ML UG)

•Treatment Capacity 48 ML (@ Source)

•No. of House Connection 18,664

W

a

t

e

r

S

u

p

p

l

y

•Sewer lines in this ward are covering 91% of toilets.

•Diameter of pipes varies from 42” to 12”

The sewage generated is 6.37 MLD and these pipes are able to

support 40 MLD , which will be able to support for future expansion.

There are around 500 manholes in the whole ward.

7.15

7.57

5.60

5.80

6.00

6.20

6.40

6.60

6.80

7.00

7.20

7.40

7.60

7.80

2001 2011 2021 2031

Dem

and

(in

MLD

)

Year

Sewerage Network

Demand - Normal Growth

Natural Ground Slope

S

e

w

e

r

a

g

e

Sewerage Network Capacity Analysis

YearPopulation (Normal Growth)

Demand -Normal Growth

2001 83,272 6.37

2011 88,200 6.75

2021 93,420 7.15

2031 98,948 7.57

Naranpura(Ward 12)

Storm water lines in this ward are lined on most of the roads, which serves adequately during rainy days

• Av. Rainfall – 980 mm (2000-2010)

• Drained – Sabarmati (non perennial river)

• Requires less treatment

S

t

o

r

m

W

a

t

e

r

EXPECTED WASTE

GENERATED

(Kgs/ Capita/ Day)

WASTE

COLLECTED

(Kgs/ Capita/ Day)

DIFFERENCE (Kgs/

Capita/ Day)

0.5 0.47 0.03

S

o

l

i

d

W

a

s

t

e

S

u

m

m

a

r

y

Sector Data Analysis Issues

Roads And

Transport

Road Hierarchy Road Width And Function Complement Each Other Good Wide Roads

Where Parking Is Not A

Nuisance As Such

Mismanaged Junctions and

garbage dumping creates

issues at some places

Parking On Street Parking

Hawkers 3 Main Chunks Of Hawkers

hawkers No demarcated place for hawkers

Land use Land Use distribution Stabalised residential conditions

Land use – roads Mix land use along the major arterial roads

FSI – roads Higher FSI being used along the arterial roads

Infrastructure Water Supply 50% of the available storage capacity being used Water being supplied for

only 2 hours.

No inpatient facility

available in government

hospitals in a radius of 5 km

around he ward

Sewerage 100% area being served

Education Municipal school being used mainly by the LIG

people (private schools being unaffordable for LIG)

but lacks basic facilities

Healthcare facilities 3.5 beds (private) per 1000 people in the ward

Street Light Serves all the areas except the stretch along the

railway line.

V

i

s

i

o

nPromoting a more compact, resource efficient Urban development by managing the growth of Urban boundary

with a higher density for development and providing sufficient green space to avoid over crowding.

P

r

o

j

e

c

t

s

Developing the green belt in a holistic manner by using its potential and stitching the urban fabric on either side of the belt

Densify the stretch along the BRTS and introducing commercial nodes near the BRTS stops

Creating better housing conditions in Sanjay Nagar slum with better infrastructure and community open spaces.

Creating a pedestrian friendly environment and encouraging public transport

Introducing more open spaces to compliment and support the high rise high density development which is being proposed

NARANPURA AHMEDABAD VEJALPUR

Year Population Growth Population Growth Population Growth

1991 63,293 28,76,710 92,160

2001 83,272 31% 35,20,085 22% 1,13,443 23%

2011 88,200 6% 55,70,585 58% 2,93,672 159%

SOURCE: AMC Ward office; Census 1991, 2001, 2011 and Vejalpur Group.

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

GREEN BELT IN WEST AHMEDABAD.

GREEN BELT FALLING IN NARANPURA.

(15% of total Green Belt)

• After 20 years, Supreme Court of India gave judgment

- 40% of the Land in Green Belt will be acquired by the AMC from the Private

Owners which will include the space required Infrastructure.

- The rest 60% of the land will be allowed for development by the Private

Owners.

What happens if AMC challenges that judgement??

It might take another 20 years to give another judgement which might be

similar to present one.

Meanwhile

HISTORY

repeats

Why ?

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

What happens if Neither AMC nor Owners don’t challenge the judgement?

INR.3465 Cr @ 42,000 per Sq.ft

With 27.6 Ha, AMC will provide all basic infrastructure to support developments in green

belt because it is its RESPONSIBILITY and Developments in remaining 41.4 ha are

MARKET DRIVEN.

Market Driven Developments are should be in such a way

- To use maximum potential of land and Rapid Access,

- Orderly developed,

- helps to minimise horizontal spatialization of City.

Service Provision + Using maximum Potential = Planned Development

Why ?

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

Step 1: Stitching the two sides of through Roads

Option 1: Arterial Road between Naranpura and Ghatlodia.

Outcomes & Implications:

• Acts as a boundary.

• Runs parallel to 132 ft. BRTS Road.

• Will support development in Naranpura

as well as Ghatlodia.

• Will affect sudden change in character of Skyline.

• Will encourage Private transportation

• Creates a valley between two high rise

commercial Zones.

Option 2: Arterial Road on the internal boundary of

greenbelt.

Outcomes & Implications:

• Forms a connecting road for

all internal roads through the

belt.• Will support developments relatively

closer to BRTS.

• land falling between BRTS and this road

may become linear CBD in few years

because of its high potential.

How ?

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

Step 2: Holistic Approach for new land Use.

Merging Option 1 & 2

• 18 M or 24 M Collector roads on

both sides of belt.

• Planned in such way to encourage

commercial wont be a disturbance

to residential.

• Direct or easy access to BRTS.

• Concentration of Commercial

land use planned along road

1 & 2.

Residential land Use Fabric

How ?

Residential49%

Commercial6%

Mixed use4%

Institutional4%

Green Areas19%

Playground2%

Open Areas2% Roads

14%

Green Belt Landuses

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

Residential49%

Commercial6%

Mixed use4%

Institutional4%

Green Areas19%

Playground2%

Open Areas2% Roads

14%

Green Belt Landuses

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

Stitching

Residential49%

Commercial6%

Mixed use4%

Institutional4%

Green Areas19%

Playground2%

Open Areas2% Roads

14%

Green Belt Landuses

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

G

r

e

e

n

B

e

l

t

• Total Green Belt Area = 69 Ha

• 40% of Land (AMC land) = 27.6 Ha

• Proposed land for Public uses (25.85 Ha)

– Roads 9.61 Ha

– Open Areas 1.46 Ha

– Green Areas 13.5 Ha

– Playground 1.28 Ha

• AMC land in Green belt (2.55 Ha)

– Garden 1.25 Ha

– School 0.85 Ha

– Parks 0.44 Ha

• Land Left with AMC (27.6 Ha + 2.55 Ha – 25.85 Ha) = 4.30

Ha = 51,427.57 Sq. Yard

• Land Value, For Rs.42000 / Sq. Yard = Rs 2,159,958/-

S

l

u

m

d

e

v

e

l

o

p

m

e

n

t

Sanjay NagarDeveloping the slum in the same area where it was existing.A low rise – high density solution with 330 sqft. of spaceprovided to each household.1400 households with a population of 6900 to be providedwith a G+1 housing typology.

What Existing Proposed

Residential Land 3.40 ha 51000 sq.m. BuA 3.05 ha 61000 sq.m. BuA

Public Greens - - 0.5 ha 0.75 sq.m./person

Commercial 0.12 ha - 0.8 ha

Roads 0.06 ha - 0.5 ha

S

l

u

m

d

e

v

e

l

o

p

m

e

n

t

Source : Aranya Housing, Indore

S

l

u

m

d

e

v

e

l

o

p

m

e

n

t

Source : Aranya Housing, Indore

O

p

e

n

B

u

i

l

t

e

x

i

s

t

i

n

g

Built32%

Open68%

O

p

e

n

B

u

i

l

t

P

r

o

p

o

s

e

d

Built26%

Open74%

B

R

T

S

Why ?

• Potential of Land along the BRTS which runs parallel to CG Road and SG highway.

• It is not creating much income to authorities.

• There is no relation between the potential and Functions.

• It has a natural fabric of mix land use.

• Main objective of BRTS of supporting more public transport

is not happening.

• Providing more commercial & institutional land uses

Will increase occupancy rate of BRTS.

PICS

Building Heights Map

B

R

T

S

How ?

Existing Land Use

Proposed Land Use

• Hierarchy of Land Use from BRTS to two sides.

• Variable allocation of land use along the BRTS,

depending on the high potential nodal points.

• Commercial land use is proposed where there are two

very close BRTS stops and where it already existed.

• Width of particular land use is subjective to existing

roads.

• Width of particular land use is subjective to existing roads.

• FSI of 4 to commercial and 3 to both mixed & residential land use

with 30% ground coverage.

1

2

5

43

For 1, 2 and 3

• Present residents of proposed commercial along

side of BRTS will be shifted to new apartments

which are going to build by increasing FSI in the

same housing board.

• Fiscal resources will be used by selling Vacant

lands of AMC.

For 4 and 5

• Proposed commercial

developments are completely

open to market by considering its

natural mixed land use fabric.

B

R

T

S

B

R

T

S

Skyline of Naranpura from BRTS

O

p

e

n

S

p

a

c

e

sArea Population Per Capita open Space

Existing Public Open Spaces

9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person

O

p

e

n

S

p

a

c

e

sArea Population Per Capita Open

Space

Existing Public Open Spaces

9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person

Proposed Public Open Spaces

25.44 Ha. 135122 1.88 Sq. M/Person

O

p

e

n

S

p

a

c

e

sArea Population Per Capita Open

Space

Existing Public Open Spaces

9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person

Proposed Public Open Spaces

25.44 Ha. 135122 1.88 Sq. M/Person

Sl.No. Gardens Area

1 Law Garden 5.87 Hectares

2 Naranpura Garden 5.67 Hectares

3 Vastrapur Garden 4.27 Hectares

4 AUDA Garden-Bopal Road 3.70 Hectares

5 Parimal Garden 3.54 Hectares

6 Mirambika Garden 1.31 Hectares

7 Pragati Nagar 1.30 Hectares

O

p

e

n

S

p

a

c

e

s

S

t

r

e

e

t

s

S

t

r

e

e

t

s

32 m wide road

12 m wide road9 m wide road

S

t

r

e

e

t

s

36 m wide road

18 m wide road 24 m wide road

H

a

w

k

e

r

s

1

2

3 9 m wide (250 m long) pedestrian street fororganised hawking activities with commercialon one side and park on the other.

1

2 2000 sq.m. of dedicated vegetable and fruit market

Analysis for Future Water Demand

Treatment Storage Supply Demand (Normal) Demand

2001 83,272 83,272 48 19.37 13.75 12.49 12.49

2011 88,200 88,200 48 28.53 14.553 13.23 13.23 Addl tank - 9.16 ML

2021 93,420 110,420 48 28.53 14.01 16.56 150 lpcd

2031 98,948 156,237 48 28.53 14.84 23.44 150 lpcd

RemarksYear

Population

(Green Belt

Population

Growth

Parameters (in MLD)

48 48 48 48

19.37

28.53 28.53 28.53

13.75 14.553

12.49 13.23 14.01 14.84

23.44

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051

Qu

anti

ty (

in M

LD)

Years

Water Demand Analysis

Treatment Capacity

Storage

Supply

Demand (Normal)

Demand (Green & BRTS)

Poly. (Demand (Normal))

Poly. (Demand (Green & BRTS))

If Population increase based on Greenbelt & BRTS developments, Naranpura ward required additional storage tank facility during the year 2036

W

a

t

e

r

S

u

p

p

l

y

Sewerage Network Capacity Analysis

YearPopulation

(Normal Growth)

Population (Green Belt &

BRTS)Demand - Normal

GrowthDemand (Green

Belt & BRTS) Remarks

2001 83,272 83,272 6.37 6.37

2011 88,200 88,200 6.75 6.75

2021 93,420 1,10,420 7.15 8.45

2031 98,948 1,56,237 7.57 11.95

7.15 7.57 6.37 6.75

8.45

11.95

-

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

2001 2011 2021 2031

Dem

and

(in

MLD

)

Year

Sewerage Network

Demand - NormalGrowth

Demand (Green Belt& BRTS)

S

e

w

e

r

a

g

e

I

n

f

r

a

s

t

r

u

c

t

u

r

e

Infrastructure

Status

Current (2011)Projection

(2031)Remarks

Watersupply Supply 14.55 ML (165 LPCD)23.44 ML (150

LPCD)

Required additional

storage tank facility during the year 2036

Sewerage Generated 6.75 ML 11.95 ML

Existing Sewerage

System can carry 40 ML

Stormwater Rainfall 980 mm (Avg) N ADrained -

Sabarmati River

Solid waste Management

Collection Efficiency

95%Needs to

improve public awareness.

Street LightSufficient Lighting on

streets

N

a

r

a

n

p

u

r

a

2

0

3

0

Residential53%

Commercial3%

Mixed use11%

Institutional (PU / Semi PU)

3%

Green Areas5%

Playground3%

Open Areas3%

Roads19%

Final Landuse

Area 3.31 sq.km. (262 ha)

Population 156237 (Projection 2031)

Density 472 pph

Road Length 33.7 Km

Road Density 10.18 Km/sq.km.