21
Fundamentals of Ethical Leadership: Make your Department “Grouse-Resistant” Ethical Leadership Series Metro Fire Chief Officers Association Session 1 January 31, 2011

Mfcoa 013111

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Introductory presentation for leadership program with Metro Fire Chief Officers Association, Minnesota. Audience was a cohort of fire chiefs.

Citation preview

Page 1: Mfcoa 013111

Fundamentals of Ethical

Leadership:Make your Department

“Grouse-Resistant”Ethical Leadership Series

Metro Fire Chief Officers AssociationSession 1

January 31, 2011

Page 2: Mfcoa 013111

Agenda

• Introduction

• Our Real Goal: Engagement

• Ethical Leadership Fundamentals

• What’s Next?

Page 3: Mfcoa 013111

ELA’s “Guidelines for Grownups”

• Confidentiality Expectations

• Engagement

• Respectful Candor

• Thoughtful Expediency

• Comfort and Fun

Page 4: Mfcoa 013111

Empower others to improve the world

Page 5: Mfcoa 013111

Among my teachers…

Page 6: Mfcoa 013111

ELA’s Fire Service Paradox 1

Where can we protect more lives and property?

Page 7: Mfcoa 013111

ELA’s Fire Service Paradox #2

Volunteer Public Employee

Night Gig Self-Identity

Team Member Individual

Peer SubordinateSeeks Direction Seeks Autonomy

SeeksFlexibility

Work isMission-Critical

Ethical Leadership can promoteengagement and performance

Page 8: Mfcoa 013111

What drives employee engagement?

Source: Gallup G12 Summary

Page 9: Mfcoa 013111

• Clear expectations for my performance• Materials and equipment• Ability to do good work in assigned

roles• A supervisor who cares about me• Co-workers committed to quality work• Opportunities to learn and grow

Source: Gallup G12 Summary

Gallup’s six key factors

Page 10: Mfcoa 013111

Pre

ssu

re

LOW

HIGH

HIGHSupport

Adapted from Social Discipline Window - Paul McCold and Ted Wachtel - 2000

TO WITH

NOT FOR

punitive relational

neglectful permissive

authoritarianstigmatising

authoritative respectful

indifferentpassive

protectiveeasy/undemanding

Relational Leadership Model

Page 11: Mfcoa 013111

TO WITH

NOT FOR

RelationalLeaders offer high pressure,

high support

Pre

ssu

re

Support

How do you lead?

Page 12: Mfcoa 013111

We are most likely to trust and co-operate with individuals and

systems - whether we win or lose - when we experience fair

process.

“Process” includesanything

fromgiving

feedback toa single FFto setting

departmentalstrategy

Kim & Mauborgne, Harvard Business Review, July – August 1997

Why think about “Fair Process?”

Page 13: Mfcoa 013111

• Engagement– Stakeholders invited to participate– Participants have an opportunity to be heard

• Explanation– Process and rationale are clearly explained, along with

decisions and outcomes.– Explanation is respectful – it is also often educational.

• Expectation Clarity– When decisions are made, implications for all

stakeholders are clearly articulated.– Everyone knows what to expect, and what is expected

of them.

FairProcess is

workingWITHothers

The Three Elements of Fair Process

Page 14: Mfcoa 013111

Fair Process does not mean:

• Democracy• Consensus• Happiness or Contentment• Accommodation of individual wishes

or whims• Command relinquishing legitimate

decision authority or accountability

A good indication of a fair process is when people who do not“get their way” understand why and how a decision was made,

and acknowledge that the process was fair.

Page 15: Mfcoa 013111

Talking about Ethics

• Authority or Traditions.• Conscience or gut feel.• Name-calling

OR

• Ethical frameworks• Analytical thinking • Constructive discussion

Page 16: Mfcoa 013111

Prevailing Ethical Theories

• Virtue Ethics• Rights-Based Theories• Kantianism• Utilitarianism

Page 17: Mfcoa 013111

J.S. Mill b. 1806

Immanuel Kantb. 1724

Aristotle b. 384 BCE

Think “OMAR”:Outcomes – Motives – Agent – Rights

3,000 years in 5 minutes

John Lockeb. 1632

Page 18: Mfcoa 013111

Ethical Discussion Framework

• Articulate position (or competing positions). • Define disagreements or points of contention.• Clarify terms and concepts• Seek and clarify situation facts and objective data• Analyze positions

Outcomes Motives Agent Rights

Page 19: Mfcoa 013111

• Past: What happened– Observable events and facts– First person and objective

• Present: Why it matters– Consequences of actions.– Implications

• Future: Required Changes, Directions– Changes in actions or behaviors– Reinforcement to repeat positive actions

FairProcess is

workingWITHothers

Giving Feedback

What does “Relational Leadership” teach usabout giving feedback?

Page 20: Mfcoa 013111

What’s Next?

February: Deep Readiness: Virtues of EL in the Fire Svc.

March: Ethical Leadership Through Change

April: Mentoring, Managing, and Evaluating Performance

• Your goals for our time?

• What do you want to talk

about together?

• Other ideas?

We have plenty of room to customize!

Page 21: Mfcoa 013111

Thank you for your attention!

Chad Weinstein

Ethical Leaders in Action, LLC

[email protected]

651-646-1512

“We enable ethical leaders to achieve

extraordinary results”