22
Collaborations between unis and productive ways to assure quality MBA Directors Forum Melbourne 8 May2014 www.slideshare.net/markalistairfreeman

MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Collaborations between unis and productive ways to assure quality

MBA Directors Forum Melbourne 8 May2014

www.slideshare.net/markalistairfreeman

Page 2: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Achievement Matters: External Peer Review of Accounting Learning Standards

Australian Business Deans Council

CPA Australia

Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia

Office for Learning and Teaching

Project team : Adelaide (B.Howieson), Deakin (K.Watty), RMIT (B.O’Connell, P.de Lange), Sydney (M.Freeman), UWA (P. Hancock), UWS (A.Abraham)

Participants from 17 providers

Websites

achievementmatters.com.au disciplinestandards.pbworks.com

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of any of these stakeholders

Page 3: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman
Page 4: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

article.wn.com

The MBA is 1 of 5 degrees up for TEQSA scrutiny in 2015.

Challenge

What evidence will you prioritise?

Page 5: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Standard: “a definite level of excellence or attainment..... so established by authority, custom, or consensus” (Sadler, 2012)

Learning outcome: ‘knows, understands and can do’

www.shutterstock.com

Definitions

Page 6: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

“Assessment is largely dependent upon professional judgement and confidence in such judgement requires the establishment of appropriate forums for the development and sharing of standards within and between disciplinary and professional communities”

Tenet 6: Price et al (2008)

Literature

Page 7: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

“The idea that a single external examiner could make a comparative judgement on the national, and indeed international, standard of a programme has always been flawed”

6 experienced EE in 4 disciplines. Five 2i/2ii each.

Findings

– Only 1 jointly highest (of 5) by all 6 EE in discipline

– 9 of 20 ranked both best and worst (of 5)

2012

2013

Page 8: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

8

Scott Ray 4/4/09 http://www.flickr.com/photos/15075617@N05/3418528723

1.1 The course of study meets the Qualification Standards. 1.2 There are robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study which take account of external standards and requirements, e.g. published discipline standards, professional accreditation, input from relevant external stakeholders, and comparable standards at other higher education providers.

Legislation

Page 9: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Martin Morris 20/2/12 http://www.flickr.com/photos/martin55/6929721749/

5.5 “The academic standards

intended to be achieved by

students and the standards

actually achieved by students

in the course of study are

benchmarked against similar

accredited courses of study.”

outcomes

External AoL

Page 10: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

10

http://vimeo.com/channels/testingtogether/66041940

Every uni should have systemic policy for external moderation but not necessary same every discipline

TEQSA Chief

Page 11: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Accounting graduate

Knowledge

Application

Judgement Communication

& Teamwork

Self management

Bachelor graduates are able to

exercise judgement

under supervision to solve

routine accounting problems

in straightforward contexts

using social, ethical, economic,

regulatory and global

perspectives

Masters

minimal

emerging/advanced complex

^

2010

Page 12: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Assess Enter Compare Pre-F2F

F2F

Consensus Agree

Post-F2F

Apply

Confirm

2011-14 Calibrate

Page 13: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Calibration – Task validity Written communication

Individual confidence pre-workshop

Individual results pre-workshop

• Min & max (n=26)

• Mean ±1 SD

Group results at workshop

• Small groups (n=5)

• Consensus

91%

NA A

NA A

Page 14: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Calibration – UG student 1 Written communication

Individual confidence pre-workshop

Individual results pre-workshop

• Min & max (n=26)

• Mean ±1 SD

Group results at workshop

• Small groups (n=5)

• Consensus

NM M

NM M

78%

....S2, S3, S4, S5

Page 15: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Calibration workshops Date Location Learning standards calibrated Level

Jul 2011 Darwin Written Communication Bachelor

Sep 2011 Melbourne Written Communication Master

Feb 2012 Adelaide Written Communication Bachelor

Sep 2012 Sydney

Knowledge Written Communication

Master

Feb 2013 Adelaide

Knowledge Oral Communication

Master

Jul 2013 Perth

Application Judgement Oral Communication

Bachelor

Feb 2014 Adelaide Application Judgement Teamwork

Master

Jul 2014 Sydney Teamwork Self management Written communication

Bachelor

Page 16: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Martin Morris 20/2/12 http://www.flickr.com/photos/martin55/6929721749/

Live review

Page 17: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

17

Live review report

Page 18: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

18

Appendix

Page 19: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑡𝑠

𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 ?

Page 20: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Your uni predicts your MBA will be selected by TEQSA as a sample degree for scrutiny in 2015. How would you evidence external AOL?

1. Do nothing about LO - rely on other indicators like CEQ 2. Pay an experienced external academic to assess a sample 3. Develop/access validated standardised test for some LO (eg. knowledge) 4. Select partner department to verify sample assignments & exams in a

final year unit for 5% students in each grade band 5. Lobby QVS to extend to masters, specifically MBA, in 2014 6. Lobby MBA Directors Forum to establish (small sample) ‘double blind

peer review’ benchmarking process with academics +/or practitioners 7. As per 6 but process includes calibration 8. As per 6 but lobby deans council to apply across all business degrees 9. As per 8 but process includes calibration

Page 21: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Conclusions

• Drivers

– Regulatory framework and accreditation

– Comtimuous improvement

• Model

– Promotes direct evidence for proving then improving

– Positive benefit cost ratio

• Sustainability

Page 22: MBA Directors Forum 8 May 2014 - Mark Freeman

Thank you