Upload
robert-burroughs
View
516
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Explicitly addressing different subject matters' "ways of knowing" can help unsuccessful learners achieve in high school classrooms. Presented at National Association of Therapeutic Schools & Programs (NATSAP) Midwest Regional Conference, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, September 23, 2011.
Citation preview
Sept 23, 2011: NATSAP Midwest Region Conference, Hilton Oakbrook Terrace, Chicago, IL
Making the Implicit Explicit: Teaching subject-matter literacy skills to previously unsuccessful learners
Ike & Burroughs, Educational Consultants
Robert Burroughs, PhD
Introduction
Research has found that struggling learners have poor literacy skills in discipline-specific classes, such as science, history, or math (Klenck & Kibby, 2000).
Moving from “learning to read” to “reading to learn” is the crucial educational pivot.
One factor in the difficulty of “reading to learn” is the implicit differences in the ways that different subjects organize and communicate information.
Explicit instruction in implicit subject-matter differences will benefit struggling students.
Goals and Objectives
Demonstrate the concept of multiple literacies through an experiential activity.
Understand the importance of subject-matter literacies in curriculum and instruction.
Demonstrate activities to use with students to strengthen subject-matter literacies.
A Brief Quiz on “Blue Notes”
1. What is a “blue note”?
2. Why does the author consider blue notes important to harmonies of popular songs?
3. How does “blue note” harmony differ from “classical” harmony?
Processing “Blue Notes”
1. Write down all the words (vocabulary) you find difficult to understand in this excerpt.
2. Underline the “thesis” or main idea of this excerpt.
3. Write three questions, the answers to which would help you understand this passage.
Why “Blue Notes” Is Hard To Read Vocabulary
Technical music terms: eg, harmony, tonality, chord
Adapted technical terms: eg, minor key, cadential, scale
Metaphors: eg, excursion, resolve
Symbols
Background knowledge
Audience
Ways of Knowing
The specialized literacies of academic subjects: “ways of knowing, thinking and doing” (Applebee, 1996)
Form the boundaries of subject matter, as well as participation criteria; for example:
Acceptable topics of investigation
Acceptable methods of inquiry
What counts as compelling evidence
What counts as persuasive modes of argument
Nominalization
Transformation of one grammatical form into another; typically actions (verbs) into things (nouns).
Example:
“The production of rock waste by mechanical processes and chemical changes is called weathering.”
Producing rock waste (an action) = “weathering” (a thing).
Nominalization: Science Text
Nominalization: History Text
Nominalization: Science vs History
Both texts use nominalization, but in different ways
Science text uses it to further technical vocabulary of science
History texts use it to create abstractions.
Text Structure: Science vs History
Science argument often begins with hypothesis
Implicit structure based on “scientific method”
Focus on procedure, process, and methods
Evidence stresses observations, data, experiments
History often structured as narrative
Focus on sequence of events and chronology
Trends or generalizations highlighted from narrative
Evidence stresses documents and artifacts
Disciplinary Patterns of Thought and Langage
Function Biology Physics History
Orienting attention
Used guiding questions to focus students on bio functions, their labels, and place within systems
Focused students on observing and investigating
Contextualized historical info; focused on cultural perspectives
Refining Understanding
Encouraged review of terms and patterns
Examined possible explanations based on related scientific knowledge
Explored content from multiple social and cultural perspectives
Selecting Evidence
Used proper labels for parts and related them to systems
Made direct links between observed phenomenon and principles of physics
Explained interpretations through references to documents and artifacts
Adapted from:
Langer, J.A. (1992). Speaking of knowing: Conceptions of understanding in the academic disciplines. In J. Mangieri & K. Collins (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century (pp. 69-85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
So What?
“Ways of knowing” are so internalized by teachers that it is automatic and unexpressed.
Yet, students are often stumped by vocabulary and limited background knowledge.
For many texts they read and write, students end up being the wrong audience.
Reading Algebra
“Difficulties that students encounter in algebra are often the results of difficulties in reading”
“Diagrams and other visual aids often accompany the exposition and the examples.”
“Many familiar words--for example power, variable, simplify--take on specialized meanings in algebra.”
“Identifying and interpreting the information provided by diagrams, graphs, and tables is a skill that has to be learned”
Sample Activities & Approaches
Explicitly orienting attention, refining understanding, and citing evidence in texts that students read.
Explicitly addressing text structures as a way to improve reading and writing.
“Doing” science: Footprints
Orienting Students’ Attention
What is this phenomenon (bomb shelters) an example of?
Cold War paranoia?
Nuclear warfare naivete?
Government show?
Explicit rationales and connections to previous material give students context for instruction.
Refining Understanding
Questions that are related to how you frame the passage have the most coherence for students.
What questions would you want your students to ask about this passage?
Explicitly telling students the purpose of your questions will help clarify your questions for students.
Citing Evidence
Grammar school children in the 1950s--as I did--”duck and cover” to survive a nuclear blast.
Structure Frame & Summary Template
Note how explicit these organizers are.
Other Text Structures
Armbruster (1989) identifies several other text structures and provides frames and templates:
Cause/effect text structure
Sequence text structure
Compare/contrast text structure
Footprints Instructions
1. With a partner, read your copy of the case below and study the footprint patterns on the back page.
2. On the data sheet, use the prompts to note what you observe in the footprints.
3. Write down all the hypotheses you can think of that could explain these footprints.
4. Discuss the different hypotheses you have generated, think about what information you would need to test or explain your hypotheses.
Footprints Scenarios
You and a few close friends have taken a trip to Hawaii for the winter break. You really felt you needed to get away from the gloom of the mid-western winters to feel the warm sunshine and get out of those dreary winter clothes. Each day you and your friend have explored a new beach along the coastline. The edges by the water have new shell finds each day, the interiors of the beach have sand patterns and ripples where it is exposed to the wind, and interesting little sheltered spots that seem unchanged over time.
One day when you and your friend are walking along a new stretch of beach you see the most unusual footprint patterns in the sand.
Thank You for Your Attendance
Questions?