32
Continuous Innovation: Making K-12 Mandarin Immersion Work National Chinese Language Conference April 16 th 2011 Portland Public Schools: Mary Patterson, Kojo Hakam and Michael Bacon

M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work (Q2)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Districts and schools devote much time, energy and resources to establishing elementary-level immersion programs. However, effective K–12 articulation necessitates long-term planning with backward design and a continuous learning model that ensures high-level outcomes and sustainability. Reflecting upon 13 years of experience in building a K–12 Mandarin immersion program in collaboration with the University of Oregon’s Chinese Flagship Program, a panel of immersion specialists will share their experiences. With its rich experience, the Oregon Chinese Flagship Program seeks to engage colleagues in a national dialogue and collaboration in building quality and sustainable K–12 Mandarin immersion. Participants will discuss setting proficiency based outcomes, using data to drive decisions, and building a developmentally and linguistically appropriate secondary-level continuation.

Citation preview

Page 1: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Continuous Innovation: Making K-12 Mandarin Immersion WorkNational Chinese Language ConferenceApril 16th 2011Portland Public Schools: Mary Patterson, Kojo Hakam and Michael Bacon

Page 2: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Overview

Introductions

Why are we here?

3 Simple Questions Where are we going?

Where are we now?

How do we get where we want to be?

Q & A

Page 3: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Why are we here?

Share experiences and lessons learned in articulating a K-12 (K-16 Program)

Learn from our Mandarin immersion colleagues

Pose questions to help start a national dialogue

Page 4: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

The Long Journey…

任重道远。。。

Page 5: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Where are we going?

Targeted Outcomes

Page 6: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Where are we going?

Changing how languages are learned

- full professional proficiency

- learning language through content

- real-life application of knowledge

- K-16 sequence

Page 7: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Our Proficiency Targets

Upon completion of…

5th Grade: Novice High/Intermediate Low

8th Grade: Intermediate Mid

9th Grade: Intermediate Mid/High

10th Grade: Intermediate High

11th Grade: Intermediate High/Advanced Low

12th Grade: Advanced Low/Advanced Mid

Page 8: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

ACTFL Proficiency Scale

MIP Graduation

Benchmark & Flagship Entrance

Requirement8th Grade

Benchmark 5th Grade Benchmark

Flagship University

Scholar Benchmark

Page 9: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Speaking

Report by: Center for Applied Second Language Studies (CASLS), University of Oregon January 2011 Sponsored by: US Department of Education

Page 10: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Reading

Report by: Center for Applied Second Language Studies (CASLS), University of Oregon January 2011 Sponsored by: US Department of Education

Page 11: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Writing

Report by: Center for Applied Second Language Studies (CASLS), University of Oregon January 2011 Sponsored by: US Department of Education

Page 12: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Setting Outcome Targets

Why?Accountability

Celebration

Improvement

How?ACTFL National Standards

LinguaFolio CAN DOs

National and Local Data

Teacher training and involvement

Page 13: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Where are we now?Assessments and Results

Page 14: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Assessment ToolsNOELLA

Grades 3-7

R, W, L, S

Novice Intermediate

STAMP Grades 7-12

R, W, S Novice Intermediate

CAP Grades 7-12

R, W, L, S

Novice Intermediate Advanced

Page 15: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Listening Grade 3-7

Page 16: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Reading Grade 3-7

Page 17: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Reading Grade 7-11

NOELLA

Page 18: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Speaking Grade 7-11

Page 19: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Writing Grade 7-11

Page 20: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Assessments and Results

How do we use them?Data Dialogues w/teachers

Informing students and parents

Analyze to inform and prioritize work

Challenges:Summative vs. Formative

Limitations of current assessments

Aligning our instruction and curriculum

Page 21: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

How do we Get “there’?

Continuous Learning

Page 22: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

How do we get ‘there’? Backwards Planning

High School and Middle School (6-8)Start Planning Now with Targets in Mind

Builds on elementary program, but not just an extension

Developmentally appropriate with capstone experiences

Proficiency Based Entrance Criteria, Courses and Grades (HS)

Alignment of instruction and curriculum to outcomes

Extended Learning Opportunities

Assessment for Learning: Clear Targets and Effective Feedback

Extended Learning Opportunities

Page 23: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Why Proficiency?

If you put a student who hasn’t mastered Algebra in a Pre-

Calculus class, how would that effect the…

Algebra student?

Pre-Calculus students?

Teacher?

Page 24: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

HS Proficiency-Based Program

Minimum entry proficiency requirements for every course

Based on national standards (ACTFL)

Level-appropriate classes

Classroom tasks closely tied to proficiency guidelines

Page 25: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Chinese Language & Culture Studies Program

Page 26: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Dual Track Program

Page 27: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Extended Learning Opportunities

Page 28: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Extended Learning

• Blended Online Courses

• China Research Residency

• U of O Connections

• Sister-school exchanges

• Summer Institute in Yunnan

Page 29: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

How do we get ‘there’? Refining Elementary

Alignment of curriculum Textbook

Curriculum Framework

ACTFL Guidelines

Assessments

Traditional Mandarin Assessments

Performance Tasks/Work Samples

NOELLA

Page 30: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Teaching Language Through Academic

ContentWhat does the data tell us?

Writing:

Explicitly teach about the similarities/differences between English and Mandarin language structures.

Need for Targeted PD:

Reading instructional strategies/SIOP

Page 31: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Content Allocation

Aligning academic content K-12

Core standards

Transference

Balancing the instructional Day

Page 32: M. Bacon, D.K. Hakam, M. Patterson: Continuous Innovation: Making K–12 Mandarin Immersion Work  (Q2)

Questions?