30
Claudio Attaccalite http://abineel.grenoble.cnrs.f http://abineel.grenoble.cnrs.f r/ r/ Linear response theory and TDDFT CECAM Yambo School 2013 (Lausanne) CECAM Yambo School 2013 (Lausanne)

Linear response theory and TDDFT

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Introduction to linear response theory and TDDFT

Citation preview

Page 1: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Claudio Attaccalitehttp://abineel.grenoble.cnrs.fhttp://abineel.grenoble.cnrs.fr/r/

Linear response theory and TDDFT

CECAM Yambo School 2013 (Lausanne)CECAM Yambo School 2013 (Lausanne)

Page 2: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Motivations: Absorption Spectroscopy

-+

-Many Body Effects!!!

h ν

Page 3: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Motivations(II):Absorption Spectroscopy

Absorption linearly related to the Imaginary part of the MACROSCOPIC dielectric constant (frequency dependent)

Page 4: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Outline

How can we calculate the response of the system? IP, local field effects and Time Dependent DFT

Some applications and recent steps forward

Conclusions

Response of the system to a perturbation →Linear Response Regime

Page 5: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Spectroscopy

Page 6: Linear response theory and TDDFT

From Maxwell equation to the response function

D(r , t )=ϵ0 E (r , t)+P (r , t) ∇⋅E (r , t)=4 πρtot (r , t)∇⋅D(r , t )=4πρext (r , t)

From Gauss's law:Materials equations:

Electric Displacemen

t

Electric Field

Polarization

P(r , t )=∫χ(t−t ' , r , r ')E (t ' r ')dt ' dr '+∫ dt1dt 2χ

2(...)E (t1)E (t 2

)+O (E3)

In general:

For a small perturbation we consider only the first term, the linear response regimeP(r , t )=∫χ(t−t ' ,r , r ')E (t ' r ')dt ' dr '

In Fourier space:

P(ω)=ϵ0 χ(ω)E (ω)=ϵ0(ϵ(ω)−1)E (ω) D(ω)=ϵ0ϵ(ω)E (ω)

Page 7: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Response Functions

ϵ(ω)=D(ω)

ϵ0 E (ω)=

δV ext (ω)

δV tot (ω)

Moving from Maxwell equation to linear response theory we define

ϵ−1

(ω)=δV tot (ω)

δV ext (ω)

V tot ( r⃗ t)=V ext ( r⃗ t )+∫ dt '∫d r⃗ ' v ( r⃗− r⃗ ')ρind ( r⃗

' t ')

V tot ( r⃗ , t)=V ext ( r⃗ , t)+V ind ( r⃗ , t ')

where

The induced charge density results in a total potential via the Poisson equation.

ϵ−1

(ω)=1−vδρind

δV ext

ϵ(ω)=1+vδρind

δV tot

Our goal is to calculate the derivatives of the induced density respect to the external potential

Page 8: Linear response theory and TDDFT

The Kubo formula 1/2

H=H 0+H ext (t)=H 0+∫ d rρ(r) V ext (r , t)

We star from the time-dependent Schroedinger equation:

i∂ψ

∂ t=[H 0+H ext (t)] ψ(t)

...and search for a solution as product of the solution for Ho plus an another function (interaction representation)...

ψ̃(t)=ei H 0 t ψ(t )

i∂ ψ̃(t)

∂ t=eiH 0 t H ext(t)e

−iH 0 t ψ̃(t )= H̃ ext (t) ψ̃(t )

...and we can write a formal solution as: ψ̃(t)=e−i∫t 0

t̃H ext(t)dt

ψ̃(t 0)

Page 9: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Kubo Formula (1957)

r t ,r ' t '=ind r , t ext r ' , t '

=−i ⟨[ r , t r ' t ' ]⟩

The Kubo formula 2/2

ψ̃(t)=e−i∫t 0

t̃H ext(t)dt

ψ̃(t 0)=[1+1i∫t 0

tdt ' H ext (t ')+O (H ext

2 )] ψ̃(t 0)

For a weak perturbation we can expand:

And now we can calculate the induced density:

ρ(t )=⟨ ψ̃(t )∣ρ̃(t)∣ψ̃(t )⟩≈⟨ρ⟩0−i∫t 0

t⟨[ρ(t) , H ext (t ')]⟩+O(H ext

2 )

ρind (t)=−i∫t0

t

∫ dr ⟨[ρ(r , t ) ,ρ(r ' t ')]⟩ϕext (r ' , t ')

...and finally......and finally...

The linear response to a perturbation is independent on the perturbation and depends only on the properties of

the sample

Page 10: Linear response theory and TDDFT

How to calculated the dielectric constant

i∂ρ̂k (t )

∂ t=[H k+V eff , ρ̂k ] ρ̂k (t )=∑i

f (ϵk , i)∣ψi , k ⟩ ⟨ψi , k∣

The Von Neumann equation (see Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_matrix)

r t ,r ' t '=

indr , t

ext r ' , t ' =−i ⟨[ r , t r ' t ' ]⟩We want to calculate:

We expand X in an independent particle basis set

χ( r⃗ t , r⃗ ' t ')= ∑i , j , l ,m k

χi , j , l ,m, kϕi , k (r )ϕ j ,k∗ (r )ϕl ,k (r ' )ϕm ,k

∗ (r ')

χi , j , l ,m , k=∂ρ̂i , j , k

∂V l ,m ,k

Quantum Theory of the Dielectric Constant in Real Solids

Adler Phys. Rev. 126, 413–420 (1962)

What is Veff ?

Page 11: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Independent Particle

Independent Particle Veff = V

ext

∂V l ,m,keff i

∂ρi , j ,k

∂ t= ∂

∂V l ,m, keff [H k+V eff , ρ̂k ]i , j , k

Using: {H i , j ,k = δi , j ϵi(k)

ρ̂i , j , k = δi , j f (ϵi ,k)+∂ ρ̂k

∂V eff⋅Veff+....

And Fourier transform respect to t-t', we get:

χi , j , l ,m, k (ω)=f (ϵi ,k)−f (ϵ j ,k)

ℏω−ϵ j ,k+ϵi ,k+iηδ j ,lδi ,m

i∂ρ̂k (t )

∂ t=[H k+V eff , ρ̂k ]

χi , j , l ,m , k=∂ρ̂i , j , k

∂V l ,m ,k

Page 12: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Optical Absorption : IP

Non Interacting System

δρNI=χ0δV tot χ

0=∑

ij

ϕi(r)ϕ j*(r)ϕi

*(r ' )ϕj(r ')

ω−(ϵi−ϵ j)+ iη

Hartree, Hartree-Fock, dft...

=ℑχ0=∑ij

∣⟨ j∣D∣i⟩∣2δ(ω−(ϵ j−ϵi))

ϵ''(ω)=

8π2

ω2 ∑i , j

∣⟨ϕi∣e⋅v̂∣ϕ j ⟩∣2δ(ϵi−ϵ j−ℏω)

Absorption by independent Kohn-Sham particles

Particles are interacting!

Page 13: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Time-dependent Hartree (local fields)

Time-dependent Hartree(local fields effects)

Veff = V

ext + VH

V tot r t =V ext r t ∫dt '∫ d r ' v r−r 'ind r' t '

The induced charge density results in a total potential via

the Poisson equation.

r , r ' , t−t ' =r , t

V ext r ' , t ' =

r , t V tot r ' ' , t ' '

V tot r ' ' , t ' '

V ext r ' , t '

χ( r⃗ t , r⃗ ' t ')=χ0( r⃗ t , r⃗ ' t ')+∫ dt1dt2∫ d r⃗1d r⃗2χ0 ( r⃗ t , r⃗1 t1)v (r⃗1−r⃗2)χ(r⃗2 t2 , r⃗' t ')

ind

V indV tot

0r ,r '=

ind r , t

V tot r' t '

Screening of the external perturbation

Page 14: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Time-dependent Hartree (local fileds)

PRB 72 153310(2005)

Page 15: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic Perturbation....

ϵ−1(ω)=1+v

δρind

δV ext

ϵ(ω)=1−vδρind

δV tot

Which is the right equation?

Page 16: Linear response theory and TDDFT

...microscopic observables

Not correct!!

Page 17: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic averages 1/3

In a periodic medium every function V(r) can be represented by the Fourier

series:V (r)=∫dq∑G

V (q+G)ei(q+G)r

orV (r)=∫dqV (q , r)eiqr=∫ dq∑G

V (q+G)ei(q+G )r

Where: V (q ,r )=∑GV (q+G)eiGr

The G components describe the oscillation in the cell while the q components the oscillation larger then L

Page 18: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic averages 2/4

Page 19: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic averages 3/4

Page 20: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic averages 4/4

The external fields is macroscopic, only components G=0

Page 21: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Macroscopic averages and local fields

If you want the macroscopic response use the first equation and then invert the dielectric

constant

ϵ−1

(ω)=1+vδρind

δV ext

ϵ(ω)=1−vδρind

δV tot

Local fields are not enough....

Page 22: Linear response theory and TDDFT

What is missing?

Two particle excitations, what is missing?Two particle excitations, what is missing?electron-hole interaction, exchange, higher order effects......

Page 23: Linear response theory and TDDFT

The DFT and TDDFT way

Page 24: Linear response theory and TDDFT

DFT versus TDDFT

Page 25: Linear response theory and TDDFT

DFT versus TDDFT

Page 26: Linear response theory and TDDFT

V ext=0 V extV HV xc

q ,=0q ,

0q ,vf xcq , q ,

TDDFT is an exact theory for neutral

excitations!

Time Dependent DFT

V eff (r , t )=V H (r , t)+ V xc(r , t)+ V ext (r , t)

Interacting System

Non Interacting System

Petersilka et al. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 80, 584 (1996)

I=NI= I

V ext

0=NI

V eff

... by using ...

=01

V H

V ext

V xc

V ext

vf xc

i∂ρ̂k (t )

∂ t=[H KS , ρ̂k ]=[H k

0+V eff , ρ̂k ]

Page 27: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Time Dependent DFT

Choice of the xc-functional

...with a good xc-functional you can get the right spectra!!!

Page 28: Linear response theory and TDDFT

Summary

● How to calculate linear response in solidsmolecules

● The local fields effects: time-dependent Hartree

● Correlation problem: TD-Hartree is not enough!

● Correlation effects can be included by mean of TDDFT

Page 29: Linear response theory and TDDFT

29

Page 30: Linear response theory and TDDFT

References!!!

Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green's-function approachesRMP, vol 74, pg 601, (2002 ) G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio

On the web:● http://yambo-code.org/lectures.php● http://freescience.info/manybody.php● http://freescience.info/tddft.php● http://freescience.info/spectroscopy.php

Books: