63
1 Wrapping the Gift? Evaluating the School Library Program LIB 620 Library Management Fall 2010

Library wrap 2007

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Library wrap 2007

1

Wrapping the Gift?Evaluating the School

Library Program

LIB 620 Library ManagementFall 2010

Page 2: Library wrap 2007

22

What are school libraries for?

The Mission of the School Library– The school library provides

information and ideas that are fundamental to functioning successfully in today’s information and knowledge-based society. The school library equips students with life-long learning skills and develops the imagination, enabling them to live as responsible citizens.

– IFLA/UNESCO School Library Manifesto

Page 3: Library wrap 2007

33

AASL Mission

The mission of the school library media program is to ensure that the students and staff are effective users of ideas and information. The school library media specialist empowers students to be critical thinkers, enthusiastic readers, skillful researchers, and ethical users of information . . . – Empowering Learners (2009).

Page 4: Library wrap 2007

44

What about school librarians?

Roles and Responsibilities of the School Library Media Specialist– Leader– Instructional Partner– Information Specialist– Teacher– Program Administrator

Page 5: Library wrap 2007

55

More on the role of the LMS

•Guiding principles– Principle One: School libraries have no

boundaries. – Principle Two: Library and information

professionals should be flexible. – Principle Three: Ensure that students are effective

users of ideas and information. – Principle Four: Information is everywhere,

essential, and central. • Lowe, C. A.

The Role of the School Library Media Specialist in the 21st Century. ERIC Digest. 2000-11-00

Page 6: Library wrap 2007

66

Another way to look at it

Three critical areas of services1. Information access and delivery• The school library media specialist who has a

solid foundation in evaluating information, has technological expertise in retrieving and organizing information, and maintains a commitment to intellectual freedom, is able to create an information-rich learning environment within the school.

– Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Preparation (2003), p. 7.

Page 7: Library wrap 2007

77

More from NCATE Standards

Three critical areas of services2. Teaching and learning

• Earlier versions of the school library media specialist program focused on a consultancy role and stressed locational guidance, but current practice demands a true partnership role, in which the school library media specialist and classroom teacher are engaged together throughout the instructional process.

– Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Preparation (2003), p. 7.

Page 8: Library wrap 2007

88

More from NCATE Standards

Three critical areas of services3. Program administration

• The school library media specialist must understand management and change, must communicate clearly, and must be prepared to take tactical risks. In addition, librarians must advocate for support and must create an environment that contributes to student achievement. . . . Therefore, the effective school library media specialist will exhibit leadership skills among colleagues . . .

– Program Standards for School Library Media Specialist Preparation (2003), p. 7.

Page 10: Library wrap 2007

1010

Leadership

Are there many types of leaders?– Appointed Leaders– Expert Leaders– Interpersonal Leaders– Social/Informal Leaders

• Are you a “born leader”? If not, you can develop skills to help you become an effective leader. Just as you become a better teacher through experience, you'll become more comfortable as a leader over time.

• The Teacher Librarian as Manager

Page 13: Library wrap 2007

13

Evaluation of School Library Programs

Page 14: Library wrap 2007

14

Preemptive Action:The busy librarian’s guide to

program evaluation

Based in part on:

A workshop developed by the Pennsylvania School Librarians Association

Professional Development Committee(No longer available online)

indicates the slide was originally from the above presentation

Page 15: Library wrap 2007

15

What is evaluation?[1]

As defined by the American Evaluation Association: – evaluation involves assessing the strengths and

weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness.

– Evaluation is the systematic collection and analysis of data needed to make decisions• Evaluation Definition: What is Evaluation?

Page 16: Library wrap 2007

16

What about school library program evaluation?

Evaluation of school library media centers:–When you examine something or

someone, you examine the subject and make a judgment about the quality, significance, or condition of whatever is to be evaluated.• Emanuel T. Prostano and Joyce S. Prostano,

The School Library Media Center 5th ed. (Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1999), 44.

Page 17: Library wrap 2007

17

Purposes of evaluation

To find out what is right

To find out what is wrong

• Summary of definition in Blanche Woolls, The School Library Media Manager 2nd ed. (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 1999).

Page 18: Library wrap 2007

18

What can you evaluate?

Everything!– Collection– Personnel– Library Layout– Programs– Curriculum collaboration

– Reference service/collection:• Interview skills• Quality of the answers

provided• Satisfaction of your

patrons– Students or teachers—or

other school staff

Page 19: Library wrap 2007

19

What should you evaluate?

That depends . . . – On your priorities– On your economic needs and situation– On the policies and procedures established by your

school, school district and/or state– On how much time you have left over from your other

duties to devote to planning and executing an evaluation project

Page 20: Library wrap 2007

20

Why evaluate?

Because you have to– Continuous assessment of services can be an

ongoing requirement for accreditation/funding, etc.

Because you want to– You want to find out how well you’re doing– You want to find out how well others think

you’re doing– You want to find ways to improve your service

Page 21: Library wrap 2007

21

Why Evaluate?

• Schools are being evaluated by student academic achievement in reading, writing and math.

• Recent studies show student achievement correlates positively with effective school library programs.

Page 22: Library wrap 2007

22

Why Evaluate?

Studies show the positive correlation with student achievement occurs when there is an effective school library program [and]:– School librarians are full time and– Librarians collaborate with teachers on

instructional planning.

Page 23: Library wrap 2007

23

Why Evaluate?

Studies also show an effective school library program includes the following attributes: – Quality collections;– Increased hours of access beyond school day;– Professional development for teachers and

librarians;– Student access to technology; and– Collaboration with other types of libraries.

Page 24: Library wrap 2007

24

Why Evaluate? Because. . .

To improve, the librarian must have baseline data about the program.

To be relevant, the librarian must know if the library services and resources are aligned with the school’s goals for student achievement.

To build a case for better support, the librarian needs data that demonstrates the value of the program.

Page 25: Library wrap 2007

25

An evaluation enables you to:– Determine success in attaining program goals.– Determine students’ and teachers’ needs so they can

be incorporated into the program.– Provide a basis for resource allocation.– Recognize strengths and accomplishments.– Examine the impact of the program on

student learning.

What Can an Evaluation Do?

• Nancy Everhart, Evaluating the School Library Media Center, 1998)

Page 26: Library wrap 2007

26

It makes sense—

Focus data collecting and evaluation on those components of a school library program that the research shows correlate with student achievement.

Page 27: Library wrap 2007

27

Types of Evaluation

Formal

Informal

External

Internal

Formative During a program

Summative After the program is completed

Page 28: Library wrap 2007

28

Evaluation requires standards

How do you know if the media center is “good”/ “not good” or even “good enough”?– “Good enough” for what? For whom?

Guidelines or rubrics or objectives for collections,

performance, etc. can be found in:–

Page 29: Library wrap 2007

29

Types of Data

Quantitative Qualitative

Number of OPAC searches

Size of collection

Number of lessons planned with teachers

Students’ success rate in locating appropriate resources in OPAC searches

Collection supports the curriculum

Comprehensive and collaborative planning is in place

Page 31: Library wrap 2007

31

Qualitative: more difficult –

Standards require interpretation

Page 32: Library wrap 2007

32Interpretation means operationalization

Operationalize:– To define a concept in a way that can be measured. In

evaluation research, to translate program inputs, outputs, objectives, and goals into specific measurable variables. • Program Evaluation Glossary

http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/glossary/o-esd.htm

Page 33: Library wrap 2007

33

Interpretation means creating goals and objectives

The purpose and study goals should determine the types of methods and measures you use to conduct the evaluation

Objectives will define your standard of excellence--the minimum level of appropriate service for your particular clientele – Jo Bell Whitlach, Evaluating Reference Services

Page 34: Library wrap 2007

34

Methods of Evaluation

Obtrusive– People are aware of the evaluation

• Self-evaluation• Surveys• Observation

Unobtrusive– data collection that does not require intrusion into

the lives of participants by investigators• Glossary for Responsible Conduct in Data Management

– People are unaware of the evaluation• Unobtrusive measures of physical facilities• Use of proxies—“mystery patrons”

Page 35: Library wrap 2007

35Obtrusive reference evaluations in a school library context

Questionnaires or interviews of students or teachers

Numbers gathering:– Reference question counts– Numbers/types of reference books used– Circulation statistics

Observation– By external observer– Self-observation: Journal

Page 36: Library wrap 2007

36

Evaluation Model

1. Define the question.

2. Collect data--determine needed data and method of collection.

3. Analyze the data.

4. Formulate recommendations.

5. Develop an action plan.

Page 37: Library wrap 2007

37

Research Finding

Students whose school librarian plays an instructional role tend to achieve higher than average scores.

What data are needed to determine whether or not the school librarian plays an instructional role in the school?

The Question

Evaluation Model Step 1.

Define the Question

Page 39: Library wrap 2007

3939

Empowering Learners

Building collaborative partnerships:– Guideline:

• The school library media program promotes collaboration among members of the learning community and encourages learners to be independent, lifelong users and producers of ideas and information

– Empowering learners, p. 20.

Page 40: Library wrap 2007

40

Addressing multiple literacies:– Guideline:

• The school library media program provides instruction that addresses multiple literacies, including information literacy, media literacy, visual literacy, and technology literacy.

– p. 23.

According to Empowering Learners

Page 41: Library wrap 2007

41

Determine the type needed.– Quantitative/Qualitative

Determine the method of collection.– Existing statistic– Survey, questionnaire, focus group, observation

Evaluation Model Step 2.

Collect data

Page 42: Library wrap 2007

42

– Identify areas of agreement and disagreement among groups.

– Identify areas of strength and areas that need improvement.

– Identify areas where more data is needed.

How can the data be analyzed to determine whether or not the librarian plays an effective instructional role in the school?

Evaluation Model Step 3.

Analyze the data

Page 43: Library wrap 2007

43

Agreement Example--

Target Indicator: Information Literacy Standards are integrated into content learning.

Library Staff Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Administrative Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Teaching Staff Response

12% Basic 88% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Page 44: Library wrap 2007

44

Disagreement Example--

Target Indicator: Curriculum development is modeled and promoted.

Library Staff Response

100% Basic _____ Proficient ____ ExemplaryAdministrative Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ ExemplaryTeaching Staff Response

82%Basic 18% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Page 45: Library wrap 2007

45

Strength Area Example--

Target Indicator: Collaborative planning is modeled and promoted.

Library Staff Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary Administrative Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary Teaching Staff Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Page 46: Library wrap 2007

46

Weakness Area Example--

Target Indicator: Students are engaged in reading, writing, speaking, viewing & listening for enjoyment, enrichment, & understanding.

Library Staff Response

____Basic 100% Proficient ____ Exemplary Administrative Response

100% Basic ____ Proficient ____ Exemplary Teaching Staff Response

82% Basic 18% Proficient ____ Exemplary

Page 47: Library wrap 2007

47

Contradictory Data Example—

Target Indicator:Effective teaching modeled & promoted.Library Basic ____ Prof. 100% ExemplaryAdmin. ____ Basic ____ Prof. 100% ExemplaryTeacher Basic 60% Prof. 40% Exemplary

Target Indicator: Student achievement is assessed.Library 100% Basic Prof. ExemplaryAdmin. 100% Basic ____ Prof. ExemplaryTeacher 90% Basic 10% Prof. Exemplary

Page 48: Library wrap 2007

48

Back to Step 2Collecting More Data – Focus Groups

1. How are student products and performances assessed in units involving use of the library?

2. How do you determine the products and performances to demonstrate mastery of content in units involving use of the library?

3. What is the role of reflection in student work involving use of the library?

Page 49: Library wrap 2007

49

• Review the data, formulate recommendations.

• For example: – Because of the strong correlation between the

school librarian’s instructional role and student achievement, the Advisory Committee establishes a three year goal of reaching the Exemplary level in all target indicators in the Teaching and Learning Rubric

Role of an Advisory Committee of stakeholders—

Evaluation Model Step 4.

Analyze the data

Page 50: Library wrap 2007

50Example:

Recommendations for First Year

– Review the Standards for the 21st Century Learner to ensure they align with content standards and set student expectations for analysis, evaluation and inquiry.

– Meet with teaching teams to solicit recommended revisions.

– Convene a workshop for new teachers to review the standards.

Standards for the 21st Century Learner

Adapted from

Page 51: Library wrap 2007

51Example:

Recommendations for First Year

Collaborative Planning– Establish regular common planning time for

teachers with the library media staff.

Curriculum Development– Review school policies to remove any barriers

that prevent librarians from participating in building and district curriculum sessions.

Page 52: Library wrap 2007

52Example:

Recommendations for First Year

Reading, Writing, Speaking, Viewing– Provide a series of author workshops and develop

plans with teachers for student reading, writing, speaking, and viewing responses to the author workshops.

– Involve Parents.Effective Teaching– Clarify conflicting feedback through focus groups

targeting use of assessment, differentiation, & inquiry in instruction.

– Develop recommendations based on new data.

Page 53: Library wrap 2007

53

Library staff develop an action plan for each recommendation.

The Advisory Committee of Stakeholders reviews and approves the action plans.

Evaluation Model Step 5.

Develop an actionplan

Page 54: Library wrap 2007

54

Action Plan Example:

Target Indicator: Curriculum development is modeled and promoted

Objective Activity Documentation Participants New Resources

Completion Date

Review barriers preventing librarians from participating in curriculum sessions.

Review policies

School Council minutes

School Council & admin.

None projected

Sept. 1

Secure schedule

Post schedule in lib. & faculty rm.

Principal None Sept. 10

Participate in mtgs.

Meeting minutes Librarians None projected

June 1

Report back

Faculty mtg. minutes

Librarians None Monthly

Written material

In professional library

Librarians None Within 5 days of mtg

Page 55: Library wrap 2007

55

This example of an evaluation was…

• Type (which one?)– Formal– Internal– Formative

• Data collection methods:– Research– Rubric-based

questionnaire– Focus Group

• Data type:– Quantitative– Qualitative

Page 56: Library wrap 2007

56

Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 1

Unobtrusive measures of physical facilities– “The basic premise . . . is that you can learn a

great deal . . . by looking at how things wear (‘erosion’), how things are left in the building (‘traces’) and how things are rearranged (‘adaptations for use’).”• Nancy Everhart, Evaluating the School Library

Media Center: Analysis Techniques and Research Practices. Libraries Unlimited, 1998.

Page 57: Library wrap 2007

57

Unobtrusive evaluation in schools 2

Use of proxies—“mystery patrons”– Technique used more often in academic libraries

and government documents reference services• Half-right reference: the 55% rule• 5-minute rule

– Peter Hernon and Charles R. McClure, “Unobtrusive Reference Testing: The 55 Percent Rule” Library Journal April 15, 1986, 37-41.

• “It’s not true, and now we know why . . . the so-called “55% rule” has never been tested against a truly representative field sample.”

– John V. Richardson, Jr., “Reference Is Better Than We Thought,” Library Journal April 15, 2002, 41-42.

Page 58: Library wrap 2007

58

Importance of a sophisticated model

Richardson:– “The reference service performance model [that led to

the 55% rule] was overly simplistic, samples were way too small, and the test questions were not representative of real-world reference questions.”

– “Students of reference service should learn about the existence of multiple performance outcomes (i.e., accuracy, utility, and satisfaction) and to recognize that each outcome is driven by different factors.”• “Reference Is Better Than We Thought.”

Page 59: Library wrap 2007

59

Characteristics of good models

Measures of reference service must be– Valid

• They “accurately reflect the concept being studied.”– Reliable

• They “are stable and dependable, and provide consistent results with each repeated use.”

– Practical• They “require that data be relatively easy to collect.”

– Useful• They “provide information that can be used to

improve reference services.”– Whitlach, Evaluating Reference Services.

Page 60: Library wrap 2007

60

Problems of Evaluation in School Context

Often the school librarianis the only one working in the library

An evaluation project can be time-consuming to plan and to put into action

Page 61: Library wrap 2007

61

Solutions to evaluation problems

Depends on your local situation– Your resources:

• Time, money, available warm bodies

– You and your creativity

Make evaluation part of your routine– As you plan/prepare your program(s), include

an evaluation component• Appropriate, affordable, accessible, accountable

Seek collaborative partners whenever possible

Page 62: Library wrap 2007

6262

Find out more in LIB 604!

LIB 604 Libraries in the School Curriculum– An approach to understanding the role of the

library media specialist and the media center in the school curriculum, with the aim of developing the school as a learning community, stressing collaboration between administrators, teachers and librarians in planning learning experiences.

– Offered Spring semesters– Includes a Collaborative Action

Research assignment.– See What is Collaborative Action Research?

Page 63: Library wrap 2007

6363

http://www.animationfactory.com