32
With whom was the power given to sanction segregation?

Law presentation revised

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Law presentation revised

With whom was the power given to

sanction segregation?

Page 2: Law presentation revised

Our constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among its

citizens…it does not require integration. It merely forbids segregation.

Page 3: Law presentation revised

Plessy v. Ferguson

S

Reasonable to separate because of established customs,

usages, and traditions.

No matter how blatantly and objectionable the law affects a “particular classification of people”.

Page 4: Law presentation revised

Cumming v. Board of Ed. of Richmond County

Where would black high

school students be taught?

Only interest of federal judiciary is to ensure

that all citizens should share equitably in the

tax burden

Page 5: Law presentation revised

Borea College v. Kentucky

Both races could not receive instruction from any institution as a corporation unless it was

done so 25 miles apart.

Page 6: Law presentation revised

The constitution is a colorblind document, yet …

These 3 cases established that the states could constitutionally maintain separate systems of education for blacks and whites, and in addition to this they could reach

into private education and allow it to be segregated as well.

Page 7: Law presentation revised

With whom was the power given to

sanction segregation?

The States

Page 8: Law presentation revised

Is Separate Equal?

Page 9: Law presentation revised

• NAACP-1930• Gains v. Canada-1938• 1950 Supreme Court case-rocked the

foundation of Separate But Equal• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka• Separation inherently unequal• Aftermath of this landmark decision

Page 11: Law presentation revised

GAINS V. CANADA

Page 12: Law presentation revised

1950 Supreme Court Case

Page 13: Law presentation revised

Brown v. Board of Education

Page 14: Law presentation revised

Separation Inherently Unequal

Page 15: Law presentation revised

Aftermath of decision

Page 17: Law presentation revised

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

Students were bused to schools outside their

attendance area

Meant to further integrate schools

End of Dual school systems

Imposed racial balance 71% -29%

Page 18: Law presentation revised

Results of busing…

Students were subjected to dangerous situations.

Resulted in “White Flight.”

Decreased probability of students to participate in extra curricular activities.

Page 19: Law presentation revised

Historical ExampleIntegration of Boston’s Public Schools

As police stand guard, black students arrive at predominately white South Boston High School, on the first day of court-ordered desegregation, September 12, 1974.

Police wearing their riot helmets line the street in south Boston as women, led by anti-busing advocate Louise Day Hicks march and pray to protest the busing of students, September 12, 1975.

Page 20: Law presentation revised

Quotas and Busing 25 Years Later

Most schools have voted to end race based assignments

Students no longer denied access to school based on mandated “quota”

Page 21: Law presentation revised
Page 22: Law presentation revised

Has the law failed to undothe segregation that was originally caused by the law?

Page 23: Law presentation revised

The most segregated group in the nations public schools is white students.

True or False

Page 24: Law presentation revised

TRUE. While white students are attending schools with slightly more students of colorthan in the past, they remain the most isolated of all racial groups.

Page 25: Law presentation revised

Due to the history of slavery and segregation in the South, southern states are themost segregated states for black students.True or False

Page 26: Law presentation revised

FALSE. In 2009, the top five segregated states where black students attended majority minority schools (where greater than 50% of students are of color) are California, New York, Illinois, Maryland and Texas. The first southern state in this ranking is Texas, in fifth place.

Page 27: Law presentation revised

Demographics of segregation today

Page 28: Law presentation revised

More than five decades later, throughout the nation, more schools have become more segregated than before.

Page 29: Law presentation revised

Racial segregation of neighborhood schools remains the norm in the U.S.

Page 30: Law presentation revised

What steps can we take to move forward in providing equal educational opportunities to all?

Page 31: Law presentation revised

Voluntary integration plans among school districts

Leaders making the case that desegregation properly implemented is valuable to all students

More progressive civil right agencies

Page 32: Law presentation revised

ReferencesImages From

• http://www.bing.com/images• http://www.office.microsoft.com/en-us/images• http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/brown/brown-segregation.html• http://school.discoveryeducation.com/clipart/

Video FromPBS(producer).(1974).Eyes on the prize :School desegregation in Boston[video].

Available fromhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/eyesontheprize/story/21_boston.html

• Other Resources• http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_gaines.html

• http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1949/1949_44