18
S.G.ISAVE 1 JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL By, S.G.Isave Tilak College of Education,Pune-30

Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE1

JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL

By,S.G.IsaveTilak College of Education,Pune-30

Page 2: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE2

How to describe a model ? Effects (Objectives) - Instructional &

Nurturant. Syntax. (Steps) Support System. (aids, surrounding etc.) Principal of Reaction. (Teacher’s role) Social System. (Student-teacher’s

participation)

Page 3: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE3

JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL Learning to think about social policy. There is a cognitive basis for prejudice

in lack of knowledge, poor reasoning skills and shallow commitment to basic democratic norms and values.

Page 4: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE4

JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL It is a model in Social Family of Model It is a systematic discussion. No teaching of Subject; but the

discussion of social issues related to unit in the subject.

More useful for Social Subjects.

Page 5: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE5

JURISPRUDENTIAL MODEL History. Geography. Civics. Languages. I.T. Science.

Page 6: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE6

Objectives/Effects Instructional (Direct) Framework for

analyzing social issues.

Ability to assure role of other.

Competence in social dialogue.

Nurturant (Indirect) Empathy/Pluralism. Facts about social

problems. Capacity for social

involvement and desire for social action.

Page 7: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE7

Syntax 1.Orientation to the case. 2.Identifying the issue. 3.Taking positions. 4.Exploring stances. 5.Refining and qualifying the positions. 6.Testing factual assumptions behind

qualified positions.

Page 8: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE8

Phase 1.Orientation to the case.

Introduction. Present facts. Review social broad scenario.

Page 9: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE9

Phase 2.Identifying the issue.

Finalize the problem/ question. Give a two directional statement for

discussion. e.g.- “Are we patriotic?”

Page 10: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE10

Phase 3. Taking positions. Discuss the procedure to a class. Divide a class into two sides (yes and

no) of the issue. Guide them, how to discuss.

Page 11: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE11

Phase 4. Exploring stances.

Students of a side (yes) will share their views. Teacher will argue with them and write the points on a board.

Students of a side (no) will share their views. Teacher argue will with them and write the points on a board..

Page 12: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE12

Phase 5.Refining and qualifying the positions.

Teacher will ask to students of a side (yes), to think on points raised by side (no) and review their own points.

Teacher will ask to students of a side (no), to think on points raised by side (yes) and review their own points.

Page 13: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE13

Phase 6.Testing factual assumptions behind

qualified positions. Teacher will discuss on styles of

thinking, logic, prejudices, socio-economical status etc.

Teacher guides, how to make judgment by 3600 thinking !

Page 14: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE14

Social System Teacher initiating and controlling the

discussion. Atmosphere will be open, equal and

intellectual.

Page 15: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE15

Principle of reaction All views will be respected. Probe the substance of students’

thinking. Use questions, dialogue, contradictions.

Page 16: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE16

Support System Source documents. Set up suitable for discussions, Paper-pencil to note the points. Board.

Page 17: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE17

Reference Models of Teaching – by Marsha Weil

and Bruce Joyce

Page 18: Jurisprudential inquiry model pub

S.G.ISAVE18

Thanks !