Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Institutional MOOC strategies compared
EMOOCS2016, Graz
23 February 2016
Darco Jansen, EADTU
Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R. & Colucci, E. (2014). E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions: Results of a mapping survey conducted in October-December 2013.
http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publication/e-learning_survey.sflb.ashx
Allen, I.E. and Seaman. J. (2015). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf
Jansen, D. & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in EuropeStatus report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2014. EADTU – HOME project
http://www.eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdf
Survey 2015 available in English, French and TurkishSurvey conducted Nov-Dec2015 : http://home.eadtu.eu/
Source: ONLINE REPORT CARDTRACKING ONLINE EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATEShttp://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
MOOC offering• In the US the number of institutions having a MOOC or planning to
(max 15%) is significant lower than in Europe and Canada (>40%)• Even after correction for bias in response (IPTS)
• EUA (2013): about 58% of the European institution is having a MOOC or planning to introduce them
• EADTU/HOME (2014): about 71% of the institutions has a MOOC or is planning to develop one
• JRC-IPTS (2015): about 41% of the institutions has a MOOC or is planning to develop one
• EADTU/HOME (2015): about 68% of the institutions has a MOOC or is planning to develop one
Darco Jansen
Why is Europe so much more involved in MOOCS?
Darco Jansen
Significant differences between countries?
Darco Jansen
IPTS (2015) study in five European Countries
• Reponse 178
• Correction for (neff 118)• Country• Region,• Type HEi• Past MOOC offering
according OpenEducationEuropa
Darco Jansen
Source: Education and Training Monitor 2015http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/publications/monitor15_en.pdf
Source: ONLINE REPORT CARDTRACKING ONLINE EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATEShttp://www.slideshare.net/yvespunie/ipts-opensurvey-final-55974682
EADTU – HOME survey (2014)• Reponse 67
Darco Jansen
12
6
5 5
4
3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Number of institutional responses by country
EADTU – HOME survey (2015)• Net reponse 150 (total 168)
24
18
1211
109 9 9
76
43 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Number of institutional responses by country
EADTU – HOME survey (2015)
• Net reponse 150 (total 168)
Darco Jansen
MOOC offering in Europe• European institutions are more involved in MOOCs than the US
• Is Eastern Europe going to be involved significantly as well?• In Czech Republic 66% is planning a MOOC• In Poland 24%
• Large US and EU differences: • ECTS framework• Difference between higher educational systems.
Continental European related to state funding - most institutions have equal resources Market-based US model has mixed private-public funding and
provision with large differences between HEIs.
• What are the main motives at institutional level to be involved (or not) in MOOCs?
Darco Jansen
