35

Humanism vs. constructivism

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 2: Humanism vs. constructivism

What is Humanism?

Page 3: Humanism vs. constructivism

• It is a paradigm that emerged in the 1960s, focuses on the human freedom, dignity, and potential.

A central assumption of humanism, according to Huitt (2001), is that

people act with intentionality and values. The humanistic theory of learning

involves the concept of learning through watching the behavior of others and

what results from that behavior, so learning comes about as a result of

observation (Barrett, 2006).

Page 4: Humanism vs. constructivism

Figures in Humanistic models of Learning

•Abraham Maslow (1908 – 1970):

Considered the Father of Humanistic Psychology

Page 5: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 6: Humanism vs. constructivism

• He is famous for proposing that human motivation is based on a hierarchy

of needs. The four levels (lower-order needs) are considered physiological

needs, while the top level is considered growth needs. The lower level needs

to be satisfied before higher-order. The most fundamental and basic four

layers of the pyramid contain what Maslow called "deficiency needs" or "d-

needs": esteem, friendship and love, security, and physical needs.

Page 7: Humanism vs. constructivism

• He believed that development of human potential, dignity and worth are

ultimate concerns.

• Maslow rejected behaviorist views and Freud's theories on the basis of

their reductionistic approaches. He felt Freud's view of human nature was

negative, and he valued goodness, nobility and reason.

• Maslow's theory of learning highlighted the differences between

• experiential knowledge and spectator knowledge. He regarded spectator,

• or scientific knowledge to be inferior to experiential.

Page 8: Humanism vs. constructivism

Carl Rogers (1902 – 1987)

Page 9: Humanism vs. constructivism

• He was discouraged by the emphasis on Cognitivism in education. Rogers‘ point of view emphasized the inclusion of feelings and

emotions in education.

• He believed that the highest levels of significant learning included personal

involvement so they could change attitudes, behavior, and in some cases, even the

personality of the learner. Learning needed to be evaluated by the learner and take on

meaning as part of the total experience.

Page 10: Humanism vs. constructivism

“Tell me how you feel” is much more important statement to humanists rather than “Tell me what you think”

Page 11: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 12: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 13: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 14: Humanism vs. constructivism

• Constructivism is a theory of learning which posits that students learn by actively constructing their own knowledge and concepts cannot simply be transferred from teachers to students they have to be conceived.(von Glasersfeld 1996; Fosnot 1996; Duffy and Cunning-ham 1996)

• It is a school of thought that emphasizes both the learner’s role in constructing meaning out of their social interactions with the environment.

Page 15: Humanism vs. constructivism

What is the role of mind??

Page 16: Humanism vs. constructivism

• Thus, in constructivism, the familiar and inaccurate metaphor of the mind as a container waiting to be filled is replaced by the metaphor of the mind as an agent actively seeking to satisfy its curiosity and resolve troubling issues. 

Page 17: Humanism vs. constructivism

What does THAT mean in learning???

Page 18: Humanism vs. constructivism

Constructivism is the idea that, learning doesn’t just happen by the traditional methods of teachers standing in front of the class and lecturing.

Page 19: Humanism vs. constructivism

Two types of Constructivism:

1-Cognitive Constructivism: Learners must inductively discover and

transform complex information if they are to make it their own.

2-Social Constructivism: Emphasizes the importance of social interaction

and cooperative learning in constructing both cognitive and emotional

images of reality.

Page 20: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 21: Humanism vs. constructivism

• Piaget believed that children learn through organization and schemas.

He believed that by organizing concepts and ideas, children place them

into schemas. He believed that children are in control of the knowledge

that they are provided and move forward in construct their own learning

by taking part in social activities and exploration.

For PIAGET :•Learning is a developmental process that involves change, self

generation and construction each building on prior learning experiences.

Page 22: Humanism vs. constructivism

Piaget’s constructivism:

• Piaget’s constructivism offers a window into what children are interested

in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. Piaget

suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their

worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they’re

wrong.

 

Page 23: Humanism vs. constructivism

He is the champion of

constructivism

Page 24: Humanism vs. constructivism

• Children thinking and meaning making is socially constructed and emerges out of their social interactions with the environment. Developed the social cognition theory which “asserts that culture is the prime determinant of individual development” and it effects our learning development. Vygotsky theorized that a child’s cultural upbringing greatly effects their learning development. Vygotsky believed that learning needs to be engaging. He believed that learning takes place as children are interacting with each other and exploring their environment and it is simultaneous to social interaction and exploration. In other words, he did not feel as though one was more important than the other.

Page 25: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 26: Humanism vs. constructivism

Zone of Proximal Development:

The ZPD is the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can do with help.

The distance between learners existing developmental state and their potential development.

A learner has not yet learned but is capable of learning with appropriate stimuli.

Page 27: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 28: Humanism vs. constructivism

He believed that learning should be engaging to the students …they will learn better if they are interested.He believed in “educating the whole child, physically ,

mentally, and socially, and not just on the dispensation of facts and information” (Cushman et al 395)

Page 29: Humanism vs. constructivism

What does Constructivism mean for Teachers?

“In a constructivist setting, the role of the teacher is to order to engage the student’s interest. He assists the students in developing new insights and connecting them with their previous learning” (Hanley)

Page 30: Humanism vs. constructivism

Constructivism: Pros and Cons:Advantages:

Each person in the world builds their own knowledge. Focuses on student- centered learning Teacher guides students in building their own understanding

and knowledge. Students actively engaged in their learning process

Page 31: Humanism vs. constructivism

Disadvantages: Lack of teacher preparation for constructivist classrooms

Difficult to break the cycle of those who have been taught in a classroom

where they were expected to solely absorb information. 

Page 32: Humanism vs. constructivism
Page 33: Humanism vs. constructivism

References:

Brooks, Jaqueline, and Martin Brooks. "Constructivism." Funderstanding:

Education and Training for Active Learners. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2010.

<http://www.funderstanding.com/content/constructivism>.

Cashman, Thomas J., Glenda A. Gunter, Randolph E. Gunter, and Gary B. Shelly. Teachers

Discovering Computers: Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom,

Fourth Edition (Shelly Cashman Series). 4 ed. Cambridge: Course Technology, 2005. Print.

"Constructivism as a Paradigm for Teaching and Learning." THIRTEEN. N.p., n.d. Web. 16

Apr. 2010.

<http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index_sub2.html>.

Hanley, Susan. "On Constructivism." Townson. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2010.

<www.towson.edu/csme/mctp/Essays/Constructivism.txt>.

Page 34: Humanism vs. constructivism

Smith, Mark. " jerome bruner and the process of education ." contents @ the

informal education homepage. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2010.

<http://www.infed.org/thinkers/bruner.htm>.

"Vygotsky and Social Cognition." Funderstanding: Education and Training for

Active Learners. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2010.

<http://www.funderstanding.com/content/vygotsky-and-social-cognition>.

http://cte.jhu.edu/techacademy/fellows/ullrich/webquest/ScienceLesson.html

http://www.weac.org/News_and_Publications/education_news/1996-

1997/under.aspx

Page 35: Humanism vs. constructivism

Cr by: Zahra Bayani