13
HISTORY AND FICTION M Esterman, 2009

History and fiction

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

An overview of the debate over history as fiction.

Citation preview

Page 1: History and fiction

HISTORY AND FICTIONM Esterman, 2009

Page 2: History and fiction

DEFINITIONSHistory  noun. pl. his·to·ries 1. the branch of knowledge dealing

with past events. 2. the record of past events, esp. in

connection with the human race. 3. A continuous, systematic written

narrative, in order of time, of past events as relating to a particular people, country, period, person, etc.

4. the aggregate of past events. 5. a past worth of record or out of the

ordinary.......

2

Fiction

1.The branch of literature comprising works of imaginative narration, esp. in prose form.2.Works of this class, as novels or short stories.3.Something feigned, invented, or imagined; a made-up story.4.Law: a statement or suppositions which is known to be untrue, made by authority of law to bring a case within the operation of a rule of law....

Both definitions are from The Macquarie Dictionary, 2nd Revision, 1990.

Page 3: History and fiction

ACTIVITY According to these definitions, history and

fiction are two very different things – depending on your intended meaning of “history”.

List some words that arise in BOTH definitions. What might this tell us?

Name some historians who would argue that history is, or can be, an art. Then name some who would argue against this.

3

Page 4: History and fiction

FEATURES OF FICTION Purpose of the text is to entertain or possibly

inform in a creative way. Invention, imagination and creativity is the core of

the text: invented story and/or characters and/or setting.

No established facts are required Usually a single, omniscient narrating voice – does

not need to be the author’s voice. Themes and issues can be implied or hidden within

characters, events or languge. Originality is praised Others? 4

Page 5: History and fiction

FEATURES OF HISTORY Purpose is to inform, educate, retell the ‘truth’ about

the past Theory or thesis is usually present during research and

writing Based on sources from the past Interrogation and evaluation of sources Inference, judgement and interpretation of sources Degree of objectivity Peer-reviewed or public scrutiny – new information

must be verifiable Form is usually narrative or following a

chronological sequence. Others? 5

Page 6: History and fiction

EXAMPLE: THE DA VINCI CODE Purpose: Purpose: to entertain to entertain NOT to change the history of the ChurchNOT to change the history of the Church Settings:Settings: Accurate but some are fabricated e.g. Location of Accurate but some are fabricated e.g. Location of

“Holy Grail”. Settings give people a sense that there is some “Holy Grail”. Settings give people a sense that there is some reality to the storyreality to the story

Characters:Characters: Fictional. Possibly based on people/characters Fictional. Possibly based on people/characters researched. Work with the plot – no hero is successful unless he researched. Work with the plot – no hero is successful unless he has the necessary tools and abilities to succeed.has the necessary tools and abilities to succeed.

Plot:Plot: Fictional. Most of the story (including background evidence) Fictional. Most of the story (including background evidence) is false – acknowledge by the author. Great story, little facts.is false – acknowledge by the author. Great story, little facts.

Audience:Audience: Wide, popular, “best seller” list. No academic study Wide, popular, “best seller” list. No academic study required.required.

Amazing publicity – no interviews by the author, reactions from Amazing publicity – no interviews by the author, reactions from the church = automatic publicity regardless of reaction.the church = automatic publicity regardless of reaction.

End conclusion: a work of fiction based loosely on some historical End conclusion: a work of fiction based loosely on some historical assumptions and very few established facts.assumptions and very few established facts. 6

Page 7: History and fiction

CONTENT AND FORM The core features that history and fiction can

be compared on are content and form. When analysing works of history, just as

when analysing literary works, content and form dictate what kind of text is created.

Content: the material presented in the text. Form: the style or type of text in which the

material is written.

7

By limiting your analysis to these two core elements, you will be able to more briefly discuss this debate in your

essays.

Page 8: History and fiction

HISTORY, HISTORICAL FICTION, FICTION?Examples Fiction HistoryTroy (2003)Herodotus, The HistoriesCrusades: Crescent and Cross (2003)BOS Source Book of ReadingsJournal Article about historiographyShakespeare, Hamlet

8It is important to compare features of these texts in order to assess their nature.

Page 9: History and fiction

COMMON FEATURES OF HISTORY AND FICTION

9

Objectivity

Evidence

Peer review/public scrutiny

Narrative form

Audience

To inform/educate To entertain

Argument and debate

Invention and creativity

Characters

PlotSetting

Others?

Page 10: History and fiction

OTHER ISSUES TO CONSIDER Research methodology – rigorous use of

sources or creative imagination? Sole author or collaborative effort – how

many people were involved in finalising the work?

Impact on the general public – fad or lasting? Various audiences – children, teens, adults? Effectiveness – is effective history writing as

appealing as effective fiction writing? Is good historical fiction bad history?

10

Page 11: History and fiction

COMPARING HISTORIANS Herodotus – narrator is ‘observer’ – sometimes events and evidence

contradict each other: both sides are included. Thucydides – omnicient “all knowing’” narrator tells the story of what

happened in a single voice. Bede – narrates according to the story of God’s will & the morals and

ethics of Christianity and the betterment of the Christian peoples. Gibbon – romantic narration, remembering the great deeds and people of

the past in a sentimental way – very popular form in his time. Von Ranke – past ‘as it actually happened’, using written sources to tell a

single story – God’s will, nationalistic. E.H. Carr – History narrated based on historical ‘facts’, expressing a single

view – selection of sources. Economic history. Focault – history is not an overarching narrative but specific historical

texts should be removed and read based on their own context, content and form.

White – argues that historians are inevitably linked to narrative form, and that this is the historian’s choice NOT a natural phenomena that grows from studying past events. Therefore, history is a kind of narrative fiction.

11

Page 12: History and fiction

NO RIGHT ANSWERS? Can ALL histories be categorised as either

fiction or history? Is there a percentage of fiction allowed in a

history? Do historians’ interpretations of sources

count as ‘fiction’ or ‘invention’? Who would read or view an historical fiction

rather than read a history textbook? What implications does this have?

Who cares?12

Page 13: History and fiction

POTENTIAL SOLUTION If both art (fiction) and science (history) are

required for a sense of understanding our complex world and society....

A mixture of rigorous historical research and a creative pool of historical fiction will give us the resources we need to give ourselves our historical identities.

After all, novelists will always turn to histories to inform their work and the general public will always prefer novels and films to history texts.

Isn’t it good to have various competing and conflicting stories about the past?

Do you agree? 13