35
Hiring for Impact Michael McDowell, Ed.D. @mmcdowell13, [email protected], [email protected] , #AVL2016

Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Hiring for ImpactMichael McDowell, Ed.D.

@mmcdowell13, [email protected], [email protected], #AVL2016

Page 2: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

The technology:GPS + RFID

Page 3: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

It's all about focusing on a few habits.

Page 4: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 5: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Undercurrents

The Big 41. Loss Aversion2. Value-Attribution3. Diagnosis Bias4. Overconfidence

Page 6: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Anatomy of an accident

Page 7: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

The power of loss.

Page 8: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

THIS IS IT!Your sense of urgency may override your logic...

Page 10: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

SOBE like HarvardResumes may lead you down a particular path...

Page 11: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

When roommates (and parents) know best...

Page 12: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 13: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 14: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 15: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Hiring is instinctive

Page 16: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Hiring is tied to powerful stories shaped by undercurrents that maintain irrational behavior

Page 17: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

This is the best we are going to do...look at where they came from...I just think it is so important when they say [x]...we always pick great teachers.

Page 18: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 19: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

We need dry logic to find the right people.

Page 20: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

The right people have the beliefs and behaviors that make a substantial impact on learners and the learning community.

Page 21: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

● I am an evaluator● I am a change agent● I see assessment as

feedback to me● I see learning as hard

work● I enjoy challenge

● I talk about learning and not about teaching

● I engage in dialogue not monologue

● I engage in positive relationships

● I use the language of learning

● I collaborate

BELIEFS BEHAVIORS

Page 22: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Hiring for Impact The Right Beliefs and

Behaviors

The Right People Involved

The Right Support

Page 23: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Filter and StructureExplore and InvolveDemonstrateEmbrace

Page 24: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

How it works

Step 1Filter Candidates

through screeners

Structure Interviews

Step 2General Interview

and Demonstration Lesson(s)

Step 3Provide Targeted

Support

Page 25: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Nexus

Behaviors and Beliefs.

Page 26: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

The Structured Interview• Conducted by a trained interviewer• Research-based• Designed to predict effectiveness in facilitating

student learning and growth• Calibrated so that all candidates are treated

equally

Page 27: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Example QuestionYou have a capable student who gets A’s on the tests and major assessments but does not do the the daily assigned work. How would you work with this student?

Page 28: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Right people involved• Interview conducted by a committee from the

school DO organizes interviews• Draws on expertise of faculty members across

grade levels• Committee makes recommendation to the

Principal. • No forced ranking: Our goal is to find the right

person not the best person from the group.

Page 29: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Demo/Scenario• Demo. lesson conducted by a committee from the school • Focused on key impact areas and unique needs of school• Committee makes recommendation to the Principal. • No forced ranking: Our goal is to find the right person not the

best person from the group. • Rubric is used to evaluate level of efficacy on criteria

Page 30: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Scenario

Page 31: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

You have received pre/post test results from your learners. What next steps would you take?

Page 32: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016
Page 33: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Capacity Building- Knowing and Responding to Impact

Page 34: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Questions...

Page 35: Hiring for Impact- Visible Learning 2016

Research• Dipboye, R. L. (1997). Structured selection interviews: Why do they work?

Why are they underutilized. International handbook of selection and assessment, 13, 455-473.

• Why are structured interviews so rarely used in personnel selection? van der Zee, Karen I.; Bakker, Arnold B.; Bakker, Paulien Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 87(1), Feb 2002, 176-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.176

• Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Huffcutt, Allen I.; Arthur, Winfred Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 79(2), Apr 1994, 184-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184

• Willi H. Wiesner1,* andSteven F. Cronshaw2 (2011)A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview*Journal of Occupational Psychology

• Volume 61, Issue 4, pages 275–290, December 1988