12
Systematic Teaching Feedback Christopher K. Wirth Mary Antone Andrew Leblanc Kassandra Robison

HIP Systematic Teaching Feedback

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

  • 1. Systematic Teaching Feedback

2. My frustrations A need for Quality Observation Hours Disconnect from lesson to lesson Feedback practice differed from student to student 3. Key Barrier How do we require students to complete observation hours in a more structured manner that are not part of a course? 4. Potential Solutions Require more lesson plans outside of practicum hours Schedule lessons taught into units Develop feedback criteria that would be delivered to each student following each lesson 5. Student Learning Objectives Communication - Demonstrated effective interpersonal interaction (with students) Activity Learning Outcome - Provide appropriate congruent, specific, corrective, and positive feedback. Provide complete and accurate demonstrations Critical Thinking - Employ appropriate analysis or instrumentation to improve performance and motivation Activity Learning Outcome Highlighted areas on lesson plan where feedback areas had been addressed 6. Proposal to Students 12 teaching hours or 12 lessons Three four lesson units Lesson plans required for each teach Reflections following each unit required Reflection following completion of all three units = 24 observation hours 7. The Breakdown Unit 1 No feedback Unit 2 Feedback from Qualitative Measures of Teaching Performance Scale (QMTPS) Unit 3 Feedback from Bug in Ear 8. QMTPS 9. Unit 1 No feedback Student Reactions 10. Unit 2 - QMTPS Feedback provided via email each lesson Students were to address feedback areas in following lesson plan Student Reactions 11. Unit 3 Bug in Ear Feedback provided during the lesson Two-way radio were used to communicate Student Reactions 12. Student Reflections Mary Antone Treis (Andrew Leblanc) Kassandra Robison