38
HWDSB Pedagogies for Deep Learning Integrative Thinking Challenge Prepared by: Heidi Siwak May, 2015 Dundas Central Dundas, Ontario, Canada

Heidi siwak pdl hwdsb

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  1. 1. HWDSB Pedagogies for Deep Learning Integrative Thinking Challenge Prepared by: Heidi Siwak May, 2015 Dundas Central Dundas, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2. Educators Jennifer Warren Gr 12 Heidi Siwak Gr. 6
  3. 3. When I grow up I want to be a really great thinker. Isabel
  4. 4. How do I build a thinker? How do I build a collaborator? How do I build a problem-solver?
  5. 5. Leverage the Curriculum
  6. 6. Pedagogy Design Thinking Inquiry Integrative Thinking
  7. 7. Roger Martin, former Dean, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto Integrative Thinking
  8. 8. a stance, tools, and a process for embracing complex problem-solving that allows them to bring new ideas into the world. Integrative Thinkers have
  9. 9. Ambiguous Problems Complicated but has solutions. Wicked: ambiguous The problem changes as you try to solve it.
  10. 10. The Ithink Team
  11. 11. From the Grassroots
  12. 12. The I-Think Practicum We learn along with our students. Once a month Jen and I travel to Rotman to learn more about integrative thinking. Modeling Learning
  13. 13. Could grade 6 and 12 students work together in only two one hour periods to solve an integrative thinking problem? Gr 6 students had working knowledge of collaboration strategies, tools and process Gr 12s new to integrative thinking, collaboration, familiar with some of the tools, The Challenge
  14. 14. Day 1: Problem Exploration The Rotman IThink Team created the problem: An ice cream company that treats its employees well and is eco-friendly, is losing money. Students work collaboratively to explore the problem and identify tensions.
  15. 15. 6s and 12s
  16. 16. 6s and 12s
  17. 17. Students identify tensions, create opposing pro-pro models and identify stakeholders.
  18. 18. Students consider the opposing models and look for value in each for each stakeholder. Finding Value
  19. 19. Hi Jen, That was wonderful today. My kids are so excited and had so much to say after you left. They were very nervous about working with grade 12 students. Teenagers scare them. They realized that the 12s are just people like them. They have the same kind of thoughts. They are nice and easy to work with. The art of starting a conversation with people who are complete strangers was an interesting discussion. Some were able to begin right away, others sat in awkward silence until finally someone talked. They thought learning how to introduce yourself and ask a question to get conversation going would be a good strategy. The kids loved how patient the 12s were and that they listened to ideas. They were funny and encouraging. Many mentioned they learned new vocabulary or better ways to name ideas. They liked that. They also realize the 12s learned from us which they weren't expecting. Knowing older students are grappling with the integrative thinking process surprised many. A few felt that the 12s need to work on "Yes.. and". Some of the 12s were shutting down each other's ideas (Yes ... but) or focused on why something wouldn't work. A few noticed some of the 12s sitting back and not engaging. They know the silent person might have the idea that causes a fantastic solution to a complex problem to emerge. Learning the conversation strategies for contributing might be useful. Some realized how strange it must be for grade 1's to have grade 6s show up and begin working with them. There is a new level of empathy. My students can't wait for the 12s to come back. Now that they know each other, it will feel more comfortable and they can get to work right away. Was there feedback from your students? Have a great day, Heidi After the 12s leave, we debrief
  20. 20. Grade 6s and 12s
  21. 21. Hi Heidi I just loved the energy in the class and the tone of the conversations. I agree, in a better world, we would have thought to start with an ice-breaker to team-build and to open up the lines of communication. Having the one-hour time limit set them up for that difficulty. I'm so glad the grade 12s asked if they could come back to finish the process! I love that your students noticed the either/or thinking in the grade 12s... My grade 12s are just at the beginning of that journey where they learn not to crush each other's models (and they have had six more years of becoming entrenched...). And, just because they are in grade 12 doesn't mean they are all perfectly engaged! For some of them, I was excited that they showed up to a space outside of their comfort zone. Jen Jen Reflects
  22. 22. Grade 6s and 12s
  23. 23. We share with students our rapid fail: not taking time for team-building and getting to know group members. Students take time to talk about what happened in their groups and how to improve collaboration. We begin day 2
  24. 24. 6s and 12s
  25. 25. Students try to discover what lies at the heart of opposing models.
  26. 26. Reframing a problem takes students away from tensions and model clash towards finding solutions. How might we maintain our brand identity while still making profits? Reframe the Problem
  27. 27. Reframe the Problem
  28. 28. Reframe the Problem How might we improve Bellas business by lowering prices but keep the same quality?
  29. 29. 6s Teach the 12s the art of rapid idea generation.
  30. 30. 6s Teach 12s how to build ideas using yes and
  31. 31. Creating a Prototype
  32. 32. Pitching the New Idea
  33. 33. The 1 Minute Pitch
  34. 34. The 1 Minute Pitch
  35. 35. Twitter: ask experts, parent response, share learning Blog Video: Google Drive Google Docs Webmail Global PLN meaningful feedback Leveraging Digital
  36. 36. Breaking down silos: post-secondary, high school, elementary The power of cross-division learning. The power of integrative thinking My Takeaways
  37. 37. Attached in a separate document are the voices of students. They reflected on: 1. What surprised them. 2. What challenged them. 3. What they learned. Student Voice
  38. 38. Students realized we only scratched the surface of the integrative thinking process. In the debrief they realized that there were many assumptions made that needed to be tested. Students were surprised that integrative thinking allowed them to get past roadblocks. Things to Consider