Upload
hfcheng7
View
169
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Metadata Presentation on 19/4/11 Group A
Citation preview
•Background
•User needs
•Nature of information resources
•Comparison of practice
•Services and activities
•Scheme design
•ERD diagram and implementation
•Conclusion
•Q&A
Pet adoption centre• The place where rescued abandoned pets may be sent• Pets wait for their next owner• Electronic microchip implanted as “ID card”• Health services: injection + de-sexing
Adoption• Good health condition + suitable living environment
required• Register as members first• Home visits to the adopter’s family after adoption
Database system• Used to store pet’s information consistently
Target users1. Staff• Identify pets• Retrieve records for information such as the
source, adopter’s information, etc.• Check records and dispose after use
2. Members (Potential adopters)• An interview conducted to understand the needs• Understand a pet deeply from the online
catalogue
• The necessary information: gender, size, health condition, breed and photos
Before
• Knowledge of taking care of pets and the criteria that of a suitable habitat for pets
During
• Notification about injection arrangement and expiry of membership
After
• 2 major information resources
PetsBasic description
MembersPersonal and contact information
• Comparison of online catalogues• HK Alley Cats Watch
• Comparison of online catalogues• HK Alley Cats Watch
• More basic information seen at the first glance
• Possible to have filter or search1. Plain catalogue
• Avoid long passage• Standard presentation of
information2. Additional information by Story-telling
Proposed Scheme
• Society for Abandoned Animals (SSA)
• Society for Abandoned Animals (SSA)
• Too broad• More categories needed3 general
categories
• Requires more attributes• Help decision makingConsistent set
of attributes
Proposed Scheme
• Hong Kong Dog Rescue (HKDR)
• Hong Kong Dog Rescue (HKDR)
• Avoid information overload• Necessary attributes include
breed, gender, size, ageSearch function
• More useful information, e.g. reference number, should be included
• Help locate a pet
Only “location” additionally added in preview
Proposed Scheme
• Microchip implant for identification– Locate and identify pets– Assign unique number
• Notification to staff and members– Signaling to staff when pets need treatment– Notification of expiring membership
• Catalogue for keeping records– Store pets’ information – Retrieve the information by using search function
• Updating pet information– Help adopters on decision making– When pets receive injections, update health records
for keeping track on health condition
• Arranging of home visit after adoption– Monitor the pets’ latest condition
• Summarizing statistics– Formulate strategy for operation or promotion
DC Elements
Pets Members
Title Name Last NameFirst Name
Date BirthdayDeathAdoptedArrivalInjectionDesexing
BirthdayRegistrationAdoption
Subject BreedSpecies
Type SexHairStatus
Membership TypeGender
• Dublin Core (DC) is used as our schema framework
DC Elements
Pets Members
Description Eyes ColorBody ColorDisabilityInjectionInfection
Format SizeWeight
Source AddressE-mailHome No.Mobile No.
Identifier Chip ID Member IDID Card No.
Relation Photo Adopted Chip ID
• Presentation of schema
• Presentation of schema
• Presentation of schema
• Presentation of schema
• Presentation of schema
• Surprised to notice how metadata closely relates to us
• Impressed by the significance of:– Planning for data structure– Criteria for data selection
• No longer be appropriate to use single schema (Dublin Core) to construct a metadata scheme– Adoption of mixing different metadata schema
(Barker & Campbell, 2010)
• Barker, P. & Campbell, L. M. (2010). Metadata for Learning Materials: An Overview of Existing Standards and Current Developments. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 7(3/4), 225. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Feel free to raise your questions.
Thank you.