3
It is set out in three columns in the actual magazine but I will be analysing it on here so I had to change the format. Title at the top in bold. Film is about process of film making despite the title. First letter of review is always the biggest and in bold. The first paragraph is about the director. Mocking people in power. People who suck up. Delightful and similar to his other work. Some characters are based on him. Sarcastic. Visuals. Talking about mise en scene

Grand Budapest Hotel Review Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Grand Budapest Hotel Review Analysis

It is set out in three columns in the

actual magazine but I will be

analysing it on here so I had to

change the format. Title at the top in bold.

Film is about process of film making

despite the title.

First letter of review is always

the biggest and in bold.

The first paragraph is about

the director.

Mocking people in power. People who suck up.

Delightful and similar to his other work.

Some characters are based on him.

Sarcastic.

Visuals.

Talking about mise en scene

Page 2: Grand Budapest Hotel Review Analysis

Every shot is perfectly framed.

The setup of the story.

Give

s info

abo

ut th

e film

bu

t no

t too

mu

ch so

that it sp

oils it.

War reference in background.

Page 3: Grand Budapest Hotel Review Analysis

Director constantly reminding us

that this is a film.

Film does not feel real.

Talks about weaknesses.

He does all the work for the

audience; the audience don’t have

to work much out about the film.

Summary of strengths, tone, and

feel of the film.

Build-up of the

film. How much you enjoyed watching it.

Thoughts after looking back at the

film.