17
GOODBYE 9 TO 5 What MOOCs Mean for Academic Libraries

Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

GOODBYE 9 TO 5What MOOCs Mean for Academic Libraries

Page 2: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, V. Estrada, A. Freeman, and H. Ludgate (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. (accessed July 12, 2013).

Page 3: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by David B. Gleason

Page 4: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Kolowich, S. “Why professors at San Jose State won’t use a Harvard professor’s MOOC.” The Chronicle of Higher Education (May 2, 2013). (accessed July 12, 2013).

Page 5: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Hill, P. “Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A graphical view.” (March 6, 2013). e-Literate (accessed July 12, 2013).

Page 6: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Still from The IT Crowd, Series 1, Episode 2. ITCrowdChannel, YouTube (accessed July 12, 2013).

Page 7: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0
Page 8: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by libraryrachel

Page 9: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by Elizabeth Albert

Page 10: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

“Students in the Twitter group had the benefit of almost-always-on support for academic, co-curricular, and personal issues.”

Junco, R., G. Heiberger, and E. Loken. "The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades." Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning 27, no. 2 (April 2011): 119-132. Computers & Applied Sciences Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed July 12, 2013).

Page 11: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by cole24_

Emmons, M., and F. Wilkinson, “The academic library impact on student persistence.” College and Research Libraries 72, no. 2 (March 2011): 128-149. College & Research Libraries (accessed February 27, 2013).

Page 12: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by stuartpilbrow

Page 13: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by Andrew Finnegan

Page 14: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo from the Kheel Center, Cornell University

Page 15: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by Bill Johnston

Page 16: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Photo by Derek Bridges

Page 17: Goodbye 9 to 5 v. 2.0

Citations● Emmons, M., and F. Wilkinson, “The academic library impact on student

persistence.” College and Research Libraries 72, no. 2 (March 2011): 128-149. College & Research Libraries (accessed February 27, 2013).

● Hill, P. “Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A graphical view.” (March 6, 2013). e-Literate (accessed July 12, 2013).

● Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, V. Estrada, A. Freeman, and H. Ludgate (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. (accessed July 12, 2013).

● Junco, R., G. Heiberger, and E. Loken. "The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades." Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning 27, no. 2 (April 2011): 119-132. Computers & Applied Sciences Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed July 12, 2013).

● Kolowich, S. “Why professors at San Jose State won’t use a Harvard professor’s MOOC.” The Chronicle of Higher Education (May 2, 2013). (accessed July 12, 2013).

● Wallis, P. “Straining the quality of MOOCs: Student retention and intention.” (June 27, 2013). Hybrid Pedagogy (accessed June 28, 2013).