18
Tab 1 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS stb_stn Objective: We choose here an inclined or flat plane domain to perform plot scale simulations, to check the sensitivity of the energy balance partition to slope, vegetation properties, initial conditions. Simulations name: stb_stn Results folders: - Results elaborations in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Results/stb_stn/stb_stn.ppt - Figures saved in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Results/stb_stn/Figures/ - Matlab elaborations in: /Users/giacomo/GeoMatlab/Mfiles_points/ load_sensitivity.m plot_sensitivity.m - Input inclined DTM in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Inputs/Piano.xls - Parameters settings in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Inputs/Inpts_stb_stn004.xls - Simulations index in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Simulations/sim_stb_stn.txt Simulation assumptions: - Flat (or inclined) 11x11 dtm - Forcing as stb_tot simulations (Clear sky days in September 1999) - Reference simulation with intermediate parameters (stb_stn004f) zo=0.1 m; do=0.66 m fc=0.5 (for all parameters see 'sensitivity' in Inpts_stb_stn004.xls) - Saturated initial conditions, 10 days spin up. - Soil parameters as in Neustift station soil (very organic soil at the surface).

GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Tab 1 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

stb_stn

Objective:We choose here an inclined or flat plane domain to perform plot scale simulations, to check the sensitivity of the energy balance partition to slope, vegetation properties, initial conditions.

Simulations name: stb_stnResults folders:- Results elaborations in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Results/stb_stn/stb_stn.ppt- Figures saved in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Results/stb_stn/Figures/ - Matlab elaborations in: /Users/giacomo/GeoMatlab/Mfiles_points/

load_sensitivity.m plot_sensitivity.m- Input inclined DTM in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Inputs/Piano.xls- Parameters settings in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Inputs/Inpts_stb_stn004.xls- Simulations index in: /Users/giacomo/EURAC/Stubai/Simulations/sim_stb_stn.txt

Simulation assumptions:- Flat (or inclined) 11x11 dtm- Forcing as stb_tot simulations (Clear sky days in September 1999)- Reference simulation with intermediate parameters (stb_stn004f)

zo=0.1 m; do=0.66 mfc=0.5(for all parameters see 'sensitivity' in Inpts_stb_stn004.xls)

- Saturated initial conditions, 10 days spin up.- Soil parameters as in Neustift station soil (very organic soil at the surface).

Page 2: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 1 Reference simulation

stb_stn004f

Flat, fc=05, zo=0.1 m

Page 3: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 3 Sensitivity to aspect

stb_stn004f-004s-004n

Flat30o S 30o N

Page 4: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 4 Sensitivity to canopy fraction fc

stb_stn007-008

fc=1 fc=0.5 fc=0

Page 5: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 5 Sensitivity to roughness length zo

stb_stn007-008

zo=0.001 m zo=0.1 m zo=1 m

Page 6: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 9 Sensitivity to soil thermal propertieseffect on surface fluxes

stb_stn013-015

k_solid = 8.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 2.16 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 0.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 2.16 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 0.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 1 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 8.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 1 E6 J/(m^3 K)

Very little effect on surface fluxes

Page 7: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 10 Sensitivity to soil thermal propertieseffect on surface temperature

stb_stn013-015

k_solid = 8.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 2.16 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 0.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 2.16 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 0.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 1 E6 J/(m^3 K)

k_solid = 8.5 W/(m K) c_solid = 1 E6 J/(m^3 K)

Strong effect of soil conductivity

on surface temperature, especially the

night ones (low soils with low

conductivity, as limestone and

organic ones (or dry grass) have

very low nocturnal skin temperatures and higher daily

ones)

Page 8: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Fig 11 Sensitivity to air temperature

stb_stn016-017

BASE

- see Table in inpts-stb_stn004.xls- a change in Ta simply translates Ts- very little change in fluxes (less than 2 W/m2);- Ts quickly adapts itself to the new Ta - if Ta increase very slight decrease of LE and G, decrease of H- very simplistic conclusion: if only Ta changes, does no change the energy forcing,what does it change is - the frozen / unfrozen threshold and the consequent phenology - the competitive advantage among species

TA + 2C TA - 2C

Difference - "+ 2 C"

Difference - "- 2 C"

Ta 2 -2 CRn 1 -1 W m^-2H -2 3 W m^-2

LE 2 -2 W m^-2G 2 -2 W m^-2

Page 9: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

r/c 1forest r/c 1grass5 1Zoow min 5 zo0,026 10hc m 6 0,2hc m7 10hc/zo 7 10hc/zo9 1fc 9 1fc

10 250root mm 10 150root mm11 6LAI 11 5LAI12 0,2albedo 12 0,2albedo14 50sigma K 14 30sigma K15 20h_sup 15 10h_sup

r/c 1bare soil r/c 1rocks

1 7lu 1 8lu2 1rough 2 1rough3 1zo rough 3 10zo rough4 10zo snow 4 10zo snow

12 0,2albedo 12 0,2albedo13 1C_m 13 1C_m14 1sigma K 14 1sigma K15 1h_sup 15 1h_sup

Getop land cover parameterization - a sensitivity analysis

Study area: Neustift Date of simulation: September 1999 run 10 days

r/c 1forest r/c 1grass1 1ClasseSoil 1 2ClasseSoil2 1,00-02Kh_sat 2 1,00E-03Kh_sat3 0,15teta_r 3 0,05teta_r4 0,5teta_sat 4 0,4teta_sat7 0,74k_solid 7 1k_solid8 2,16E-06c_solid 8 2,16E+06c_solid9 0,2teta_wp 9 0,15teta_wp

10 0,3teta_fc 10 0,3teta_fc

r/c 1bare soil r/c 1rocks1 7ClasseSoil 1 8ClasseSoil2 1,00E-04Kh_sat 2 1,00E-06Kh_sat3 0,1teta_r 3 0,02teta_r4 0,4teta_sat 4 0,025teta_sat7 1,5k_solid 7 4k_solid8 2,16E+06c_solid 8 2,16E+06c_solid9 0,15teta_wp 9 0,03teta_wp

10 0,2teta_fc 10 0,08teta_fc

LU parameters Soil parameters

Page 10: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Inputs: hydraulic conductivity

Kv_sat mm/s

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

00.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Theta_r

Z mm

1A - ROCk

2A - SOIL

3A - GRASS

4A - FOREST

Page 11: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Inputs: Soil water content

Theta_r

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Theta_r

Z mm

1A - ROCk

2A - SOIL

3A - GRASS

4A - FOREST

Theta_s

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Theta_r

Z mm

1A - ROCk

2A - SOIL

3A - GRASS

4A - FOREST

Page 12: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 13: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 14: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Tair Tsurface

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 15: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 16: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 17: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass

Page 18: GEOFRAMECafe Stefano Della Chiesa

Forest

Rocks Bare Soil

Grass