12
From Outcomes to Outputs: Shifting the Culture of Assessment in the 21st Century Learning Environment Dr Gordon Heggie - @gorheg Dr Neil McPherson - @neilgmcpherson Higher Education Academy/Pedagogic Research Institute & Observatory Inclusive Assessment in Practice Conference University of Plymouth, 24 November 2014 School of Media, Culture & Society University of the West of Scotland

From Outcomes to Outputs: Shifting the Culture of Assessment in the 21st Century Learning Environment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

From Outcomes to Outputs: Shifting the Culture of Assessment in the 21st Century Learning Environment

Dr Gordon Heggie - @gorheg

Dr Neil McPherson - @neilgmcpherson

Higher Education Academy/Pedagogic Research Institute & ObservatoryInclusive Assessment in Practice Conference

University of Plymouth, 24 November 2014

School of Media, Culture & SocietyUniversity of the West of Scotland

Context

“Engaging students in the process of research and of creating resources does far more than simply enhancing the learning experience. It also develops valuable skills for life – while improving research outcomes too”

(Jisc Inform, 37: 14 – Open Lives Project)

Our focus:

To link active, inquiry-based learning with the production of editable, re-usable, re-purposable learning objects

Our approach:

Introducing Xerte as a mode of summative assessment on an interdisciplinary research-based module on BA Social Science programme (Level 9)

Rethinking & reconfiguring learning, teaching, assessment – external and internal drivers

Considering ‘research-type’ graduate attributes – embracing uncertainty, unpredictability, supercomplexitity

Learning in ‘research mode’ / developing ‘research mindedness’

Engaging students as producers of knowledge

Growing potential of Xerte

Context

Heggie & McPherson, 2014

“Undergraduate education…requires renewed emphasis on a point strongly made by John Dewey almost a century ago: learning is based on discovery guided by mentoring rather than on the transmission of information”

Boyer Commission 1998: 15

Context

How did we do it?

Participatory pedagogy developed from learning in partnership model

Supported through ambassador/champion framework

Framework of formative engagement supporting summative assessment

From outcomes to outputs, shifting the culture of assessment

Learning outcomes

Quality assurance

Structure learning

Provide measure of performance

However

Prescriptive

Restrictive

Dampen creativity

Learning outputs

Open to creativity

Support originality

Builds on the work of others

Encourages critique

Open ended

(See Neary, 2010)

Xerte is a free open source authoring tool that allows users to produce interactive learning objects that underpinned by the principles of inclusivity and accessibility

See Xerte Homepage at http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xerte

Why Xerte?

Heggie & McPherson, 2014

Our reflections

Disruption of ‘normal’ learning, teaching and assessment practice

Embracing uncertainty & ‘failure’ (together)

Enabled self direction & authentic experience

Integrated negotiated learning & engaged leadership (learners as teachers)

Personal development, lifelong learning and employability

“the purposes of open-ended exploration could be puzzling and unsettling to students who held strongly reproductive conceptions of learning”

(Levy & Petrulis 2012: 96)

How did we navigate the challenges of inquiry-based learning and new methods of assessment?

We formed collaborative and inclusive learning communities

From the outset, I was apprehensive as to be honest it looked a bit daunting; as I had never and like most of the class done anything like this before. However, as it went on there was a sense of lets work together, giving us a sense of control and ownership over our learning plus the fact we were all sort of in the same boat, as we the students were learning just as much as the lecturers and we were all learning together

How did we navigate the shift from outcomes to outputs?

We revelled in co-creation and creativity?

At first, I wasn’t interested in this module. The reason for this is because I’m not a person who verbalises, I’m more of a creative, artistic person. I view life in shapes, colours and objects, not in words. Art is my style of writing. Throughout this module, the lecturers deliberately gave a reduced amount of guidance in order to encourage creativity and this definitely encouraged me to use my creative skills and critical thinking

Can students act as ‘change agents’ in shifting the learning and assessment landscape?

I only found it scary because I was introduced to this way of learning so late in to my degree - do it earlier!!!

It facilitates learning. That's all I need in a teaching style, and the current system fails at that

Should be implemented more as it allows the experience of university education to be more stimulating, interactive and therefore more enriching

Personally I think students taking ownership of their learning and becoming co-creators of their own learning experience has to be the future of Higher Education in Scotland

Generation X: learning in partnership with Xerte

References

Boyer Commision (1998) Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Stony Brook: State University of New York at Stony Brook

Levy P & Petrulis R (2012) How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for inquiry-based learning?. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1): 85-101.

Neary, M (2010) Student as producer: Research engaged teaching and learning at the University of Lincoln User’s Guide 2010-11 Lincoln: University of Lincoln

Dr Gordon [email protected] - @gorheg

Dr Neil McPherson [email protected] - @neilgmcpherson