Upload
claudia-cardenas
View
904
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTENT
O Present and illustrate your findings.
Make this section a completely
objective report of the results,
O Contrast or confirm your results with
other studies or with what authors
say about your study.
Remember!O 6 findings. At least 2 data per finding
O Data= triangulation (methods or
participants)
O Discussion and findings : same chapter.
O Discussion up to date - varied (depending
on the topic 10 years).
O Use past tense in findings
LAYOUT
Title (interpretive)
Description of the title
Data- evidence
Interpretation
Discussion (with one author)
What is this?O Form of the text as an influential
element in reading comprehension O Student’s language abilities
challenged by the CT tasks.O Participants broadened their
theoretical foundations on ESP
What is this?
O As aforementioned, the nexus of critical tasks and
the syllabus of the course was crucial for the
design of materials and sessions. The fact that
this study took place in an upper-intermediate
class of English made it possible that tasks were
fairly challenging so that they fit in relation to the
language competences that students were
supposed to develop by the end of the course.
What is this?
O Because students chose most of the topics,
they resulted attracting and encouraged the
learners to mire in controversial discussions
proving the objectiveness and different points
of view of the individuals, all of these,
opportunities for undergraduates to use the
target language and compromise their HOTS
so as to attain the goals of the tasks.
What is this?O Luisa: […] cuando estamos en los niveles más abajo […] a uno
siempre lo ponen es del libro, entonces cuando tú haces una lectura
es solamente sobre ese tema y tú te basas en tus respuestas de lo
que leíste del tema y se acabó o el profesor dice lo correcto y se
acabó, en cambio cuando hicimos la discusión tú tienes que buscar
la manera de hacerte entender ante los demás, tú opinión, no
solamente basado en lo que tú leíste, si no en tus vivencias, en lo
posible, entonces eso lo forza a uno más todavía para expresarse
con los demás.
What is this?
ET1: when you say appropriate what does it mean? In this specific context because sometimes we can teach something that our students don’t need ET1: I totally agree ‘cause when you say proficient that is a big word we’re not even proficient in our field of knowledge
What is this?
O This extract of a motion paper
exposes how a student’s writing skill
was challenged by the task, the
student had to be objective and the
text had to contain a well elaborated
structure.
What is this?O Provided that criticality is in its nature dependant on
content for it to take place, cited in Kabilan (2000)
from Mirman and Tishman (1998); there must be a link
made to the subject matter, which in this study was
the teaching/learning of English as a foreign language,
for instance the content and tasks that were set to
activate higher order thinking skills in the learners
followed the aims of the upper-intermediate English
course; the curricular goals and linguistic competence
were addressed successfully as the essential
objectives of the sessions.
Function and strength Example verbs NEUTRAL: verbs used to say what the writer describes in factual terms, demonstrates, refers to, and discusses, and verbs used to explain his/her methodology.
describe, show, reveal, study, demonstate, note, point out, indicate, report, observe, assume, take into consideration, examine, go on to say that, state, believe (unless this is a strong belief), mention, etc.
TENTATIVE: verbs used to say what the writer suggests or speculates on (without being absolutely certain).
suggest, speculate, intimate, hypothesise, moot, imply, propose, recommend, posit the view that, question the view that, postulate, etc.
STRONG: verbs used to say what the writer makes strong arguments and claims for.
argue, claim, emphasise, contend, maintain, assert, theorize, support the view that, deny, negate, refute, reject, challenge, strongly believe that, counter the view/argument that, etc.
no introduction to the findings
The titles are not interpretive
section is too long
Do not respond research questions
Data do not evidence what the finding intends to reveal
Authors are given more relevance
Data is not interpreted
present the same data more than once.
Provides suggestions or recommendations
Discussion and finding do not match