Linking: Reconnecting the Past

Sigal Arie-Erez

Archives, Yad Vashem

Eva/ Minerva XIIth Annual International Conference

Jerusalem, November 9th, 2016

Archival Materials Have a Life of Their Own

They wander

They scatter

move from one place,

just to turn up in other places

Archival Materials Have a Life of Their Own

Ringelblum Archive

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

The Task

• To identify scattered collections

• To unite them virtually in one location

Types of Relations in the EHRI Portal

Partially duplicated

(Part of)

Complementary

Identical (Same as)

Originals and Copies

• Contribute to a deeper understanding of historical

materials and historical processes

• Making the linkage between collections suggests a

whole new field of data, relations and leads

• Reveal the provenance of the material - the corner

stone of research

• Enhanced credibility and authenticity of the database

Linking between collections is important

Rethink Basic Principles in Archival Science

• Respect the Fonds

• Why do we need multiple descriptions?

• The story behind the material is important too

Rethink Basic Principles in Archival Science

• Different descriptions have their own merits

• Echo the history of organizations, institutional & cultural

agenda

• Finding aids

• Cataloguing is subjective

• Multiple descriptions provide additional perspectives

It is important to research the relations

between collections as well as their metadata

Interactions Between Archiving and Technology

Automated methods need to be augmented with

archival knowledge

• Identify the types of links and map them

• Set a methodology

• The same data was encoded in different fields, of different

institutions.

• Content analysis using machine learning technics

• The Creator is important

• We need to improve the metadata

• How institutions should export their data

Cooperation Across Institutions and Implications

• A joint discussion and collective learning

• A change in work methods & efficiency

• Cataloguing in a more standardized manner

• Invest more in the descriptions on the collection level

• Pay more attention to the creator field

Strive toward deeper data sharing

In Conclusion

The EHRI project of linking:

one step further in

exploring & understanding

the relations between various collections

NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies (NL)

CEGESOMA Centre for Historical Research and Documentation

on War and Contemporary Society (BE)

Jewish Museum in Prague (CZ)

Center for Holocaust Studies at the Institute for

Contemporary History in Munich (DE)

YAD VASHEM The Holocaust Martyrs’ and

Heroes’ Remembrance Authority (IL)

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USA)

Bundesarchiv (DE)

The Wiener Library Institute for the Study of

the Holocaust & Genocide (UK)

Holocaust Documentation Centre (SK)

Polish Center for Holocaust Research (PL)

The Jewish Museum of Greece (GR)

Jewish Historical Institute (PL)

King’s College London (UK)

Ontotext AD (BG)

Elie Wiesel National Institute for the Study of Holocaust

in Romania (RO)

DANS Data Archiving and Networked Services (NL)

Shoah Memorial, Museum, Center for Contemporary

Jewish Documentation (FR)

ITS International Tracing Service (DE)

Hungarian Jewish Archives (HU)

INRIA Institute for Research in Computer Science and

Automation (FR)

Vilna Gaon State Jewish Museum (LT)

VWI Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies (AT)

Foundation Jewish Contemporary Documentation Center (IT)

EHRI is funded by

the European Union