Pritish Kumar Choudhury Srashtasrita Das

Pritam BalaPragati GuptaMegha Saluja

1.38

3.834.3

4.8

Candidates forMPs and MLAs

Victoriouscandidates

Candidates withsome criminal

charge

Candidates withserious criminal

charge

Average Assert Value(Crore rupees)

74%

18%

8%

Share facing criminal charges

others

Facing criminalCases

Facing seriouscases likerape,murder etc.

When educational qualification is prescribed even for the post of last Grade servant in Government offices , there is no minimum educational qualification for the members of the Legislature and Parliament because the MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION IS UNEDUCATED .

How then can we expect elected bodies to function properly? Two, related to this is the rise of the family in political parties. Patrick French’s analysis of the current LokSabha showed that over 65 per cent of MPs under 40 had a prior family connection in politics.

Increase in selfish people due to large money involved

CourseStructure

a. Aspirants are required to undertake a 3 months distance course at least 15 months before the election.

b. An entrance exam would be conducted somewhat based on the material supplied 1year before ward elections .

c. After a gap of 1 month entrance qualified aspirants are required to pass a continuous evaluation for a duration of 45-60 days to be eligible to contest in the upcoming elections.

Eligibility Criteria For Aspirants

a. Minimum age of 25 years.b. No criminal backgrounds undertaking/affidavit.c. Minimum matriculation degree.

Advantage over Current System

a. Less impact of money and muscle power in electoral system by filtering out criminals.

b. Removal of illiterate politicians from entering the political system from grass-root level.

c. Smooth running of government as the aspirants would be well-trained and evaluated in the field of politics and law-making.

Our location for institute would be major govt. institute of the state.

Top head quarter at Andhra Pradesh

Regional heads at Calcutta Chennai Delhi Mumbai

Other universities at other top universities

CORRESPONDENCE ENTRANCE (Weightage)

EVALUATION(Weightage)

Topics to be Included

• Indian Constitution and History of Indian Politics

• Basic Law• Basic Mathematics• Basic Economics

• Mathematics (15%)• General Knowledge (20%)• Constitution and Political

History (35%)• Law and Economics(30%)

• Debatingskills(20%)

• Case study on a social issue(50%)

• Probable solutions for present Issues faced by government of India.(30%)

Organizingand managing committee

Online registration shallbe done by the aspirants and materials would be provided by the corresponding state universities.

Question paper would be set by board of directors(comprising directors of universities in regional heads)and answer sheets would be evaluated at universities in regional heads.

Evaluation would be done by faculties of state universities.

Position No. Role Criteria

Director of Head Quarter

1 To manage the entire zonal activities and head of Entrance Committee.

Retired Supreme Court Judge

Director of Zonal Heads

4 To manage all the universities coming under the zone and member of Entrance Committee.

Judges with experience in high court > 10years

Director of State Universities

To manage all the activities in the institute, head of distribution of Correspondence Materials in the state and allotment of faculties and staff.

Academic Dean of the respective institute.

Faculties per University

20 To evaluate entrance papers, conducting lectures, final evaluation process, deciding course-curriculum etc.

To be decided byDirector of State University.

Heads of various Non-Teaching Departments.

4 To look after Academic Procedures, Future Planning, Financial aspects and management of human resource

Walk-in-interviews by Director

Clerks 70 To manage all clerical works assigned by department heads

Walk-in-interviews by Non-teaching heads.

CORRESPONDENCE COURSE(CC)

ALL INDIA ENTRANCE EXAMINATION FOR

POLITICS(AIEEP)

Online registration to be done by the aspirants and required fee to be sent by the draft to the concerned going state central university.

Materials required to be provided by the university within 15 days of received of the draft.

Question papers to be set by Entrance committee Question papers should be sent to various examination

centres under guidance of bank(State bank of India). Likewise answer sheets should be collected and deposited

in banks, then sent to headquarters under the banks security

Results to be declared within 30 days and selection should be done maximum five members per ward for election.

Candidates moving forward would be maximum of 5 no per ward seat.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT AND

EVALUATION

They would be evaluated for 45-60 days. During the process of evaluation they would come across classes to increase their

debating skills, present scenario in Indian politics, basic laws, etc. They would be provided a case study where they have to look upon a suburb area nearby

where they have to provide the present scenario and steps they can take to uplift that area on which evaluation would be done.

Regular Assessment and evaluation by faculties Pass percentage is 50% and performance in grand exam at the end. No of candidates qualifying for contesting next ward elections and get a degree of

EWE(Eligible for ward elections)

Institutes would be set up as per location in the map State is divided into 3-4 district clusters on the basis of size

of state seats. Individually districts aspirants would be called up according

to their district cluster. From the number of selected candidates , one fourth of

them would be evaluated every time.

INCOME EXPENDITURE

Correspondence course fee-Rs(4000*n)=Rs(60000000)(n=15000)Accomodationcharge=Rs(5000*8000)=Rs(40000000)Total Income=Rs(100000000)AllIndia=Rs(2800000000)

Net Investment=Rs(200000000)

Considering a single state university:-• Clerk- Rs(4000*70*12)• Head of nonteaching dept-Rs(10000*4*12)• Faculties- Rs(15000*20*6)• Dean- Rs(20000*12)• Head of university- Rs(22000*12)TOTAL Rs(61,44,000)Considering 8000 students per yearAccomodation=Rs(6000*8000)=Rs(48000000)Material Cost=Rs(3000*n)N assumed to be 15000=Rs(45000000)GRAND TOTAL=Rs99144000 per state with required assumptions.So all India =Rs(2776032000+1200000+360000)=Rs(2777592000)+(examination conduct charge)=Rs(3000000000)

PROBLEMS FACED:-* Large number of candidates had to be evaluated within short interval of time.* Candidates had to be sure about their contesting in election before 15 months.* Includes about 120cr. rupees to complete the process.* Faculties and respective heads had to involve only for a year before election which implies once in

every five years.* Candidates had to leave their area for two months for complete evaluation.* Installing this system directly into system will create problem.* Politicians may get corrupt after winning the election.

MITIGATIONMITIGATION:-constructing a new institute.

* Vigilance system should keep accountability of their property for every two years, and if they didntshow any of theirproperty and later get caught that property will directly move as the property of government.

* large number of candidates had to be evaluated within short interval of time.* Candidates had to be sure about their contesting in election before 15 months.

* Includes about 120cr. rupees to complete the process.* faculties and respective heads had to involve only for a year before election which implies once

in every five years.* Candidates had to leave their area for two months for complete evaluation.

* Installing this system directly into system will create problem.

* Politicians may get corrupt after winning the election.

* Evaluation procedure has been divided into different batches to prevent the chaos but not uptothe mark.

* As this process is only for a year and once in every five years this course is under an existing university rather than

constructing a new institute.* Vigilance system should keep accountability of their property for every two years, and if they

didnt show any of their

property and later get caught that property will directly move as the property of government.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-30/india/40893897_1_criminal-cases-average-assets-re-contesting

www.electioncommision.co.inwww.eci.nic.inwww.cses.orghttp://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-

ed/how-is-india-doing-2012/article4249630.ece