50
To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All, Is the country needs to implement policies? Presented by: VIDA JOY M.QUIMSON

Edm 312 report polic y

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Edm 312 report polic y

To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All

Is the country needs toimplement policies

Presented by

VIDA JOY MQUIMSON

To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All the country needs toimplement policies programs and projects that will address the needs of specificlearners particularly those belonging to the un-reached and under-served groups

A Explicit Articulation of Inclusive Education Policy and Substantial Increase inBudget Provision

First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules

Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA

1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies

The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools

bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that

bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be

flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such

as

The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 2: Edm 312 report polic y

To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All the country needs toimplement policies programs and projects that will address the needs of specificlearners particularly those belonging to the un-reached and under-served groups

A Explicit Articulation of Inclusive Education Policy and Substantial Increase inBudget Provision

First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules

Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA

1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies

The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools

bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that

bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be

flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such

as

The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 3: Edm 312 report polic y

First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules

Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA

1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies

The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools

bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that

bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be

flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such

as

The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 4: Edm 312 report polic y

The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools

bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that

bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be

flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such

as

The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 5: Edm 312 report polic y

bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that

bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be

flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such

as

The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 6: Edm 312 report polic y

1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs

Social Factors

1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 7: Edm 312 report polic y

Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash

effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative

1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 8: Edm 312 report polic y

Geographical and geophysical factors

1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season

1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 9: Edm 312 report polic y

bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners

bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and

bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately

bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify

the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and

secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living

could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 10: Edm 312 report polic y

bull bull Street Children

bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other

bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)

bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)

bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)

bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on

bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public

bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 11: Edm 312 report polic y

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets

to 1990) 2

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education

Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low

Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 12: Edm 312 report polic y

bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 13: Edm 312 report polic y

In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System

Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 14: Edm 312 report polic y

MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 15: Edm 312 report polic y

Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 16: Edm 312 report polic y

SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding

functions and composition of

MC-IHDCrdquo

DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the

Localization of the MDGsrdquo

MTPDP 2004-2010 hews

closely to the MDGs

Strong commitment

of the business

sector and civil society

Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP

2005-2010

Strong support of

donor community

for the MDGs

Legislative support of Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 17: Edm 312 report polic y

Poverty Situation

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 18: Edm 312 report polic y

FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 531

Cordillera Region 312

Metro Manila 73

Ilocos Region 302

Cagayan Valley 245

Central Luzon 177

CALABARZON 188

MIMAROPA 479

Bicol Region 484

Western Visayas 391

Central Visayas 284

Eastern Visayas 433

Western Mindanao 494

Northern Mindanao 443

Southern Mindanao 344

Central Mindanao 384

CARAGA 542

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 19: Edm 312 report polic y

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531

Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region

Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidenceof Families ()

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 20: Edm 312 report polic y

FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003

ARMM 241

Cordillera Region 134

Metro Manila 06

Ilocos Region 112

Cagayan Valley 76

Central Luzon 42

CALABARZON 49

MIMAROPA 229

Bicol Region 266

Western Visayas 177

Central Visayas 146

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 328

Northern Mindanao 254

Southern Mindanao 176

Central Mindanao 184

CARAGA 31

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 21: Edm 312 report polic y

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241

RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 22: Edm 312 report polic y

FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003

Legend

Below National AverageAbove National Average

ARMM 03464

Cordillera Region 04294

Metro Manila 0413

Ilocos Region 03968

Cagayan Valley 04411

Central Luzon 03486

CALABARZON 04058

MIMAROPA 04354

Bicol Region 04648

Western Visayas 04392

Central Visayas 04711

Eastern Visayas 04577

Western Mindanao 05197

Northern Mindanao 04768

Southern Mindanao 04583

Central Mindanao 04567

CARAGA 04294

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 23: Edm 312 report polic y

Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003

Region2000 2003 Change

Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29

GINI

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 24: Edm 312 report polic y

FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 25: Edm 312 report polic y

FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 26: Edm 312 report polic y

Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 27: Edm 312 report polic y

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)

bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

bull Implementation of asset reform programs

bull Delivery of human development services

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 28: Edm 312 report polic y

MDGs Amount

(in US$ million)

Share to Total MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740

2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690

3 - Promote gender equality 38 005

4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173

5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167

TOTAL 80866 10000

Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$

Source NEDA-PMS

ODA for MDGs

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 29: Edm 312 report polic y

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010

MDGs COST

(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality

6995 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251

TOTAL 17447

Source NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 30: Edm 312 report polic y

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION

Government (executive legislature judicial)

Local Government

CSOsAcademe

Local Government

PrivateBusiness

Donor Community

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 31: Edm 312 report polic y

Environmental Situationand Challenges

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 32: Edm 312 report polic y

Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability

bull Forests resources and watersheds

bull Biodiversity resources

bull Coastal and marine resources

bull Air quality

bull Water resources

bull Waste and toxic chemicals

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 33: Edm 312 report polic y

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) ()

7168400 100

2560872 36

Broadleaved 2448864

Mixed 24618

Coniferous 87390

4030588 56

Broadleaved 3847284

Mixed 69861

Coniferous 113443

247362 3

329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 34: Edm 312 report polic y

Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total

Government

Percent Non-Government

Percent

Sector

2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125

2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193

2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156

2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213

1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26

1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216

1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256

1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591

1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665

1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636

1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67

1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401

1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209

1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197

Annual Average

53995

Source DENR Annual Report

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 35: Edm 312 report polic y

Biodiversity Resources

Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the

world higher regard for the endemism of local

species

buthellip most severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 36: Edm 312 report polic y

Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro

Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 37: Edm 312 report polic y

Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air

quality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at

5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 38: Edm 312 report polic y

Priority Policies and Programs

bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management

bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code

bull Various biodiversity acts

bull Fisheries Code and AFMA

bull Clean Air Act

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 39: Edm 312 report polic y

Challenges and Priorities for Action

bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources

bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas

bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all

industries

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 40: Edm 312 report polic y

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 41: Edm 312 report polic y

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 42: Edm 312 report polic y

SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890

(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990

(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740

(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 43: Edm 312 report polic y

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)

Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Source NEDA-PIS

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

FINANCING THE MDGs

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 44: Edm 312 report polic y

CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions

bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects

bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills

bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation

bull Scale-up campaign for localization

bull Develop an advocacy plan

bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 45: Edm 312 report polic y

Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United

Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations

bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)

bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)

bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 46: Edm 312 report polic y

Hindering Factors

bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)

bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative

bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and

bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 47: Edm 312 report polic y

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction

Strategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 48: Edm 312 report polic y

Implications on the Philippine Economy

MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances

  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50
Page 49: Edm 312 report polic y
  • To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All Is the country needs to implement policies
  • PowerPoint Presentation
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • The MDGs are Owned by All
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Poverty Situation
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
  • FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
  • Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
  • Priority Policies and Programs
  • Slide 29
  • INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
  • Slide 31
  • Environmental Situation and Challenges
  • Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Biodiversity Resources
  • Slide 37
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • Challenges and Priorities for Action
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
  • Slide 42
  • Slide 43
  • Slide 44
  • CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
  • Facilitating Factors
  • Hindering Factors
  • Parallel Initiatives
  • Implications on the Philippine Economy
  • Slide 50