Upload
informa-australia
View
517
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What does evidence-based teaching in literacy mean?
This Presentation adapted
from
Read About It: Scientific
Evidence for Effective
Teaching of Reading
Dr Kerry Hempenstall
Evidence-based education:
The integration of professional wisdom with the best available empirical evidence in making decisions about how to provide effective instruction (Whitehurst, 2002).
Doesn’t supplant the craft of teaching.
Empirical evidence means … ?
Teaching practice is consistent with what is
known about literacy development. So, chosen
approaches are theoretically plausible.
Teaching practice is consistent with
approaches that have been demonstrated to be
effective in evoking skilled reading for
students. So, empirically validated in quality
studies.
Evidence-based literacy education
(Teachers should) engage with the evidence-
based research literature on what works for
students, with and without learning
difficulties, and understand what constitutes
evidence (Australian National Inquiry into the
Teaching of Literacy, NITL, 2005).
Why the need for reform?
“Notwithstanding substantial increases in expenditure
on education over the past decade, national and
international assessments of student achievement in
Australia show little improvement and in some areas
standards have dropped” (Productivity Commission,
2016)
Why a need for reform?One million Australian primary students are at
risk of reading failure – 24% of all students
and 40% of disadvantaged students.
Why the need for reform?
When experience, personality, intuition, or
creativity are the sole determinants of teaching
practice, we risk inconsistencies of
effectiveness across teachers, and thus major
inequalities at the system level.
Why have we not yet seen EBT adopted?
Teachers feel underprepared for the realities of
teaching lacking the necessary content
knowledge and pedagogical skills (Roberts-
Hull, Jensen, & Cooper, 2015).
Little rigorous evaluation of programs is done
within the Australian school system (Productivity Commission, 2016).
Reports have often preceded reform
In GB, the Primary National Strategy (2006-
2015) followed from the Rose Report (2006).
In the USA, the No Child Left Behind Act
(2002) and Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA,
2015) arose from the report of the National
Reading Panel (2000).
In Australia?
Might reform occur here similarly?
In Australia, there was the report of the
National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy
(NITL, 2005). It used the term evidence-based
48 times.
The recommendations were never
adopted in this country.
Change in the air?
Australian Government Review of Funding for
Schooling Panel (2011) criticised the:
lack of an evidence-base for educational
programs in Australia.
absence of evaluation of the adopted
programs’ effects on learning.
Change in the air?“The national education evidence base should:
drive improved student achievement through
monitoring of performance,
evaluation of what works best,
dissemination of evidence, and
application of that evidence by educators and
policy makers” (Productivity Commission,
2016 Draft Recommendation 2)
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group 2015
Universities, as part of the accreditation process,
must provide detailed evidence that their
teaching courses are evidence-based and
integrate professional experience with theory.
2016 Australian Government report Quality Schools, Quality Outcomes.
Requires teachers to use explicit literacy
instruction in schools to help reverse
Australia’s current decline in international
assessments.
Australian Government 2012 Response to Recommendations of the
Dyslexia Working Party
Appropriate teaching strategies, shown
through rigorous, evidence based research to
be effective in developing strong literacy
skills, are to be used in all Australian junior
primary classrooms.
All teacher-training syllabi should include
training in evidence-based reading instruction.
What does the EB literacy research say is important? The Big 5
All students learn best when teachers adopt an
integrated approach to reading that explicitly
teaches five specific areas: phonemic
awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and
comprehension (NITL, 2005; NRP, 2000).
The Big 5: Phonemic awareness
Conscious realization that spoken words can
be decomposed into about 44 discrete single
sounds (phonemes).
It allows hearing the differences among
spoken words, such as house, mouse, louse.
It enables the beginning reader to appreciate
the logic of the alphabetic writing system.
Explicit & Implicit phonics
In an explicit program, students will be taught
initially:
The associations between the sounds
(phonemes) and their associated letters
(graphemes).
Blending (What word do these sounds make
when we put them together mmm-aaa-nnn?”),
and Segmenting (“Let’s sound out this word”).
Implicit phonics
“What sound occurs in each of these words:
mad, maple, moon?”
The words may be pointed to or spoken by the
teacher, but the sounds in isolation from words
are not presented.
Usually, the associations are taught incidentally
within stories rather than systematically.
Systematic?
Systematic instruction includes attention to the
detail of the teaching process.
Instruction largely teacher-directed, based on a
logical analysis of the skills required and their
most effective sequence.
Includes: massed and spaced practice of those
skills (sometimes in isolation from stories),
corrective feedback of errors, and continuous
evaluation of progress.
Report findings
“Direct systematic instruction in phonics
during the early years of schooling is an
essential foundation for teaching children to
read” (Australian National Inquiry into the
Teaching of Literacy, 2005).
Explicit systematic phonics is a vital element
in beginning reading (British Primary National
Strategy, 2006).
The Big 5: Fluency
Fast and accurate word reading develops from
reading practice.
Like skilled musicians and athletes, fluent
readers have developed automaticity enabling
effortless reading.
Fluency allows readers to put all their mental
energies into reading for meaning –
comprehension.
The Big 5: Vocabulary
Vocabulary: The words students must know to
communicate effectively in listening,
speaking, reading, and writing.
Developing a vocabulary is an incremental
process.
Direct teaching is necessary but insufficient.
The average school-age child learns about
3,000-4000 new words per year.
The average number of new words taught in
school in a year is about 300-500.
The Big 5: Reading Comprehension
The ability to understand and gain meaning
from what has been read.
If decoding and vocabulary develop normally,
less than 1% have reading comprehension
problems (Spencer, Quinn, & Wagner, 2014).
A commonality in the various comprehension
strategies taught ― the reader is actively
interacting with or interrogating the text.
Where to find out what works?
Google these sites:
The Early Childhood Technical Assistance
Center
Best Evidence Encyclopedia,
MUSEC Briefings
Promising Practices Network,
What Works Clearinghouse
Education Consumers Foundation
Non EBP for learning difficulties Megavitamins - Allergy treatments - Herbs -
Evening Primrose oil - Vitamin A – Chelation -
Homeopathy
Stimulants – Tranquillizers - Anti-histamines - Anti-
convulsants
Cranial Sacral Therapy - Dolphin therapy
Sensory Integration – Chiropractic – Osteopathy –
Educational Kinesiology - Sunflower Therapy
Behavioural Optometry - Coloured (Irlen) lenses
Brain-based programs, e.g., Dore, Arrowsmith,
Brain Gym, Doman Delacato
Literacy beliefs in conflict with EBT
Teacher initiative, creativity, and intuition
provide the best means of meeting the needs of
all students.
Teaching is ineffectual compared to the impact
of socioeconomic status and social
disadvantage.
Knowledge and skills are usually best
discovered, rather than taught.
Literacy beliefs in conflict with EBT
It is only the relationship between a teacher
and a child that evokes learning.
Learning to read is as natural as learning to
speak.
Children learn to read by reading books.
Literacy beliefs in conflict with EBT
Children learn to read by reading books.
Parents’ reading to children is sufficient to
evoke skilled reading.
Good readers skim over words rather than
attending to detail.
Skilled reading involves prediction from
context.
English is too irregular for phonics to be
helpful.
Accuracy is not necessary for effective reading
Good spelling derives simply from the act of
writing.
Attending to students’ learning styles
improves educational outcomes.
For supporting research, Google: “Whole
Language! What was that all about?”
Handwriting & Literacy
Handwriting instruction produced large gains
in the quality, length, spelling, and fluency of
students’ writing (Santangelo & Graham, 2016).
Functional magnetic resonance imaging shows
that the specific hand movements involved in
handwriting support the visual recognition and
recall of letters (Mangen & Velay, 2010).
Spelling & Literacy
Formally teaching spelling enhances reading
and writing (Graham & Santangelo, 2014).
As students become more skilled, they can use
larger graphophonic units and morphemes in
both word recognition and spelling (Nunes,
Bryant, & Barros, 2012).
The adult writer can spell 10,000 to 20,000
words. Weekly spelling lists enable at most
3,800 words during the primary years (Scott,
2000).
Testing enhances learning!
Important as formative assessment of teaching.
Also, testing (retrieval practice) aids
knowledge organisation and accessibility.
Testing reduces forgetting.
All students benefit from it.
(Kornell & Vaughn, 2016; Pan, Pashler, Potter, &
Rickard, 2015).
Predicting the future?
Approaches and programs must produce evidence of measurable gains.
Education faculties’ curriculum changes dramatically as a new generation takes charge.
Teachers routinely become evidence-based in their classrooms – collecting formative data.
Student failure will be readily noticed and addressed systematically.
Overall rates of student failure declines.