Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing

  • Published on
    23-Jun-2015

  • View
    150

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Riley, Jenn. "Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: Whats the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing." University of North Carolina Scholarly Communications Working Group, December 13, 2011.

Transcript

  • 1. Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What's the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing Jenn Riley Head, Carolina Digital Library and Archives UNC Library

2. A STORY 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 2 3. Evolution of the digital library Item-level digitization/presentation with non-MARC metadata Curated online exhibits Addition of contextual materials: essays, lesson plans, etc Application of MPLP ideas from archives and special collections Rise of mass digitization 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 3 4. Digital humanities evolved in parallel 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 4 Early Humanities computing Text encoding Scholarly editions Now Expansive, inclusive Interactive Digital collections Text mining Computational linguistics Scholar-driven Spatial & temporal Online reference works Collaborative 5. Continuum of work 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 5 Digital collections Onlineexhibits Onlinereference sources Criticaleditions Immersive experiences Spatial humanities Collections Scholarship 6. Enter Institutional Repositories Preprints/OA Campus grey literature Data sets 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 6 7. Scholarly communication cycle 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 7 Library buys Scholar reads/accesses Scholar does research Scholar writes Scholar publishes Were here Should we be here? 8. Some areas of emerging library involvement Data management plans Funding mandates Open Access Faculty-led campus policies Library as publisher Dissemination, not necessarily peer review/editing 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 8 9. And then we have born digital library acquisitions (For which we take on stewardship responsibility) 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 9 Personal papers Research data Administrative records Student records Government publications 10. And thendigital methods in instruction! 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 10 Alternate forms of expressing research Interactive research Training digital humanists 11. SO WHATS AN ACADEMIC LIBRARY TO DO? 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 11 12. Whats next for digital collections? 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 12 Basic description, then possible enhancement Description from users Build over time Quick UI generation Reusable, user-friendly collection builder tools Streamlined collection building Librarian and scholar built exhibits APIs More methods of access With other institutions With web-scale servicesSharing 13. EXPAND KNOWLEDGE, SPREAD THE RESPONSIBILITY 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 13 14. Tiered faculty-facing services First of a kind collaborative projects API access to objects and metadata Put collections online 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 14 15. How do we ensure sustainability? We cant. But we can make it more likely Adhere to community practices Metadata Object formats Software development practices Business planning Build core infrastructure Upgrade/build once to benefit many Avoid monolithic systems 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 15 16. Modular architectures 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 16 Small pieces, loosely coupled Microservices Allows specialized development Pipelined together into larger ones Flexibility Presentation Storage Easy replacement of parts Data flow More important than ever We need to get much better at this 17. UNCs interpretation of a preservation repository 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 17 CDR Faculty research Born-digital acquisitions Locally digitized content 18. SAVE A PLACE FOR EXPERIMENTATION (especially in scholarly communication) (were not all comfortable with this yet) 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 18 19. Balance reactive with proactive 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 19 Assessment Business planning Project and respond to demand Take the long view 20. COLLABORATE 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 20 21. Thank you! jennriley@unc.edu 12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 21

Recommended

View more >