Click here to load reader
Upload
ahmed
View
2.002
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2. Name of the study 1:Online versus face-to-face learning:
looking at modes of instruction in Masters-level courses
Overview and objectives of the study:
This study examined performance of Masters-level students in
an
online course in Cognition, Learning and Assessment and
compared
it with the performance of students in a face-to-face classroom
setting
of the same
course.
Journal of Further and Higher Education(United States)
2009
3. Name of the study 1:Online versus face-to-face learning: looking
at modes of instruction in Masters-level courses
Target audience
This study examined
Sixsectionsofthecourseoveratwo-yearperiod.
Thesame Professor taught all sections overatwo-yearperiod. .
4. Name of the study 1:Online versus face-to-face learning: looking
at modes of instruction in Masters-level courses
Assessment tool:
Final exams
Two common assignments
5. Name of the study 1:Online versus face-to-face learning: looking
at modes of instruction in Masters-level courses
Study result:
From assessments tool the students in the face-to-face class
scored significantly higher on two out of the three
measures.
So there is significant difference, Better Results in the Classroom
(face to face)
6. Name of the study 1:Online versus face-to-face learning: looking
at modes of instruction in Masters-level courses
Resources :
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a913430396
7. Name of the study 2 :Comparing Learning Outcomes between
Traditional and Distance Education Introduction to Philosophy
Courses
Overview and objectives of the study:
This study compared students in traditional and distance sections
of PHIL 101: Introduction to Philosophy in terms of both objective
learning outcomes and student attitudes in the form of students'
anticipated and perceived learning and course satisfaction
Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies - Department of
Theology and Religious Studies - University of Leeds
Smith, R. J. & Palm, L. J.
2007
8. Name of the study 2 :Comparing Learning Outcomes between
Traditional and Distance Introduction to Philosophy Courses
Target audience
This study examined
141 students (56 men and 85 women.) who enrolled in Introduction to
Philosophy during the fall semester of 2005 or the spring semester
of 2006
16-week fall and spring semesters
9. Name of the study 2 :Comparing Learning Outcomes between
Traditional and Distance Introduction to Philosophy Courses
Assessment tool:
Survey Questions
Academic Performance
10. Name of the study 2 :Comparing Learning Outcomes between
Traditional and Distance Introduction to Philosophy Courses
Study result:
From assessments tool the results of the study indicated
that the traditional and distance students did not differ
significantly in their in performance on graded
performance
So there no significant difference BetweenResults in the Classroom
and distance students
11. Name of the study 2 :Comparing Learning Outcomes between
Traditional and Distance Introduction to Philosophy Courses
Resources :
http://prs.heacademy.ac.uk/view.html/PrsDiscourseArticles/5
12. Name of the study 3 :Navigational Tools' Effect on Learners'
Achievement and Attitude
Overview and objectives of the study:
The purpose of this study was to examine how the use of different
navigation tools influence the knowledge acquisition and attitudes
of learners of different ability levels
Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University
March 7, 2000
Blacksburg, Virginia
13. Name of the study 3 :Navigational Tools' Effect on Learners'
Achievement and Attitude
Target audience
This study examined
Grade 8 students at the public middle school where the researcher
was employed.
14. Name of the study 3 :Navigational Tools' Effect on Learners'
Achievement and Attitude
Assessment tool:
Academic Performance
15. Name of the study 3 :Navigational Tools' Effect on Learners'
Achievement and Attitude
Study result:
From assessments tool Results show a significant gain in
achievement for high ability level students using the navigational
tool search engine. Significant difference in attitude was found
for all ability levels using the navigational tool menu.
So there significant difference: BetterResults with student who has
high ability in using technology
16. Name of the study 3 :Navigational Tools' Effect on Learners'
Achievement and Attitude
Resources :
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04132000-16260041/unrestricted/Navigation_Tools.pdf
17. Our point of view:
We believe that we cannot say that there is or there is
nosignificant deference as everything depend on the situation it
self